Sunny Day

What sad news. A regrettable void is left behind and the memory that will live on through his work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k5dGmp99kM&list=RD7k5dGmp99kM&start_radio=1&ab_channel=Carents

I will now provide answers to several questions raised a few days ago, based on the currently available information and legal framework.
First, the police officers involved in the unauthorized disclosure of information from the Lee Sun Kyun's case have only been indicted as of June. This means the legal proceedings are still in their preliminary stage. In this case, the police officers are contesting the charges and any associated disciplinary or criminal sanctions. It is vital to underscore that no final judgment has been rendered yet.
Regarding Kim Soo Hyun and the Alleged Disappearance of Evidence.
The legal situation concerning the disappearance of evidence allegedly relevant to Kim Soo Hyun’s defense could still evolve, depending on the strategy adopted by his legal team. My analysis is limited to publicly known facts and cannot substitute a full legal assessment based on the complete case files and procedural documents.
1. What can happen to the police due to their inaction, which allegedly led to the destruction or theft of evidence? What steps should LKB (KSH's legal team) take? Which institution oversees the Korean police?
To answer properly, two key points must be distinguished:
- The initial police investigation team was replaced.
- The alleged disappearance of evidence occurred after this change.
Thus, responsibility may rest both with the initial team (for procedural delays and failure to seize evidence) and the new team, if it failed to act ex officio upon being informed of the potential evidence.
In such a case, Kim Soo Hyun is entitled to file a criminal complaint against the officers involved, under charges such as: abuse of office, negligence of duty and/or favoring the perpetrator (if bad faith or collusion is proven).
The complaint should be filed at the Prosecutor’s Office, which has initial jurisdiction over alleged misconduct by police officers.
However, these charges are only sustainable if KSH initially included the accusation of presenting false evidence as true in his defamation complaint. If this was not explicitly mentioned, the legal basis may be weaker, though amendments or supplementary complaints could potentially be filed.
The criminal liability of police officers depends on the nature of the omission.

2. Can those responsible for presenting false evidence avoid criminal liability, despite having used that evidence publicly for months?
No, they cannot completely avoid criminal liability. However, the legal qualification of the offense will influence the outcome.
If individuals (e.g., media figures or the accuser’s family) knowingly presented falsified evidence, this could amount to defamation by fabricated evidence, slanderous denunciation and/or obstruction of justice
These are cumulative offenses, and the court may apply concurrent sentencing, leading to a heavier penalty than for simple defamation. This is the legal avenue currently being exploited by figures such as Garosero and, potentially, the family of KSR.
In the case of KSR’s family, the accusation that KSH engaged in an intimate relationship with a minor (allegedly under the age of 16) is particularly serious, as they are required to present supporting evidence. Otherwise the family may be held criminally liable for slanderous denunciation. Even if they subsequently withdraw the complaint, criminal liability persists, since false accusations of this nature are prosecuted ex officio under the applicable law.

3. What would be the most suitable next steps for LKB?
Given that the evidence in question was never formally submitted to the police, the disappearance cannot be treated as destruction of evidence already in the custody of authorities. Therefore, KSH may consider the following legal strategy:
I. File a formal complaint for intentional concealment or destruction of evidence, evasion of justice, and potentially, misleading judicial authorities.
This approach creates procedural pressure: unless KSR’s family reports the “theft” or “loss” of the evidence themselves, their silence may be construed as willful obstruction of justice.
II. Initiate separate criminal complaints for the following offenses:
• false statements regarding the disappearance of evidence;
• slanderous denunciation (knowingly filing or supporting false criminal accusations);
• obstruction of justice, through the concealment or manipulation of potentially exculpatory material.
In Gar*ser*’s case, while he may argue that he acted in good faith based on information received, reckless or negligent dissemination of defamatory material, particularly without verification, may still give rise to both civil and criminal liability.
The outcome of these legal battles will depend significantly on how the current complaints are framed and whether the legal team chooses to amend, supplement, or initiate new complaints based on recent developments.

Leaving aside the fact that such a discussion has no place here, it seems you have no intention of stopping your heretical remarks, fueled by a kind of feminism that has no reverence or fear of God. Please stop making declarations as if you know God or Scripture, because not only do you clearly not know God, you also have no real understanding of what the Bible teaches. Worse still, you have the audacity to use the Word of God to promote personal ideology that directly contradicts His truth.
None of the examples you gave mention minor girls, those were your additions, not found in the biblical text. Deuteronomy 22:28–29, which you reference so confidently, must be read in the legal and historical context of ancient Israel. That passage is tied to the verses before it and distinguishes between consensual and non-consensual acts, including whether or not a girl cried out for help. Presenting it as divine permission for abuse is a gross misrepresentation and a deliberate twisting of Scripture.
Perhaps you should also read about Rahab, a prostitute who, through faith and repentance, became part of the genealogical line of Jesus Christ. That alone contradicts your portrayal of God as favoring only men or condemning women. The God you speak of is not the God of Scripture, it’s an imaginary construct, shaped by misunderstanding and perhaps painful experience, but it is not the God who revealed Himself through Christ.
As I’ve said before: the Bible is divided into two covenants—an Old Testament (the old will), and a New Testament (the new will). Just like in legal terms, when a new will is written, the old one is no longer valid. The New Testament is the living covenant. The Old Testament is prophetic: it reveals the coming of Jesus Christ: first as Savior, then as Judge. His first coming is shown in the Gospels, and His return is revealed in the Book of Revelation.
Furthermore, the Old Testament makes us aware of sin through the Law, especially the Ten Commandments. It reveals the human condition. But it is the New Testament that reveals God’s full character: grace, mercy, truth, justice, all embodied in Lord Jesus Christ, who lived among us.
If you want to understand God, read the New Testament. Look at how Lord Jesus dealt with the woman caught in adultery (John 8:1–11). That is the true image of God. He did not deny the existence of sin, but He reminded everyone that no one is without it. Sin includes not just actions, but also lying, envy, pride, hatred, sins we all carry.
And again, look at Lord Jesus Christ on the cross, in agony, still taking care of His mother and praying for those who crucified Him. That is God, and He is nothing like the false image you’ve described. If you truly want to challenge someone to prove that God values men more than women, I invite you to try to find that in the New Testament. Bring examples from the life and words of The Lord Jesus, not out-of-context fragments from the Old Testament twisted to dishonor Him.
And let me clarify one final point: you claimed it is heresy to say what Jesus would or wouldn’t say. That is simply false. If someone knows Scripture and knows God, they are led by the Holy Spirit, who reminds them what is written. This is not heresy, it is Biblical truth (John 14:26). Jesus is the Word made flesh. Knowing His Word is knowing His voice.
Finally, while affirming an ideology and accusing others of bias and hypocrisy, your own message is directed at a woman, and it clearly disrespects and attempts to ridicule her, something God never does.

This situation highlights a concerning lack of response from the police to Kim Soo Hyun’s initial defamation complaint. Once that complaint was filed, law enforcement had a duty to act promptly, including securing the mobile device(s) and other relevant evidence, since the entire investigation hinges on that material.
Claims of “evidence theft” can only be considered valid after the material in question has been formally submitted and recognized as legal evidence. In this case, it appears the intent is quite different: KSR's family and the Gar*ser* seem to be deliberately obstructing justice by making the critical evidence (already disclosed publicly) unavailable for official review.
This does not weaken KSH’s case. On the contrary, it strengthens the claim of defamation. If the supposed evidence behind the allegations has conveniently “disappeared,” it reinforces the conclusion that the accusations were baseless and defamatory from the start.
The strategy of Gar*ser* & Co. seems calculated:
1. By making the alleged evidence vanish, they aim to avoid criminal liability for submitting false evidence.
2. By avoiding a clear legal resolution, they may later insinuate that their claims were truthful and that KSH merely “escaped” due to the disappearance of that proof.
This creates a double advantage: a lighter penalty for defamation and the opportunity to maintain a false narrative in the public sphere.
Ultimately, the next steps rest with Kim Soo Hyun’s legal team. Their actions now are critical to ensuring that those responsible are held accountable, not only for defamation, but also for any attempt to interfere with the course of justice.

I know it's trendy to follow certain ideologies, but don’t cross the line into heresy.
God is not "selective" in the shallow, human sense you imply. He is holy, just, and merciful. He doesn't spare or punish arbitrarily. In fact, He did the exact opposite of favoritism. He became human, lived a sinless life, and chose to suffer and die for all: including you, including me, and including the very people mocking Him.
Yes, God died. God exists in Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Son, Jesus Christ, willingly took upon Himself the punishment for sin that we all deserve. That is not selective punishment. That is the ultimate act of love and justice combined.
So, when you speak of “God” as some distant, biased figure, you are not speaking about the God of the Bible. You are referring to a distorted image, perhaps your own projection of injustice, it’s a false image you’ve created to suit your argument.

Your message is not a genuine theological inquiry, it is a deliberate attempt to mock and distort Scripture to support a narrative rooted in sarcasm and bitterness. Selectively quoting passages from the Old Testament while intentionally ignoring their context, historical setting, and the spiritual trajectory of the Bible only serves to mislead, not to inform.
Yes, you quoted Deuteronomy 25, but why avoid Deuteronomy 22:25 or Leviticus 20, which clearly lay out severe punishments for male sexual abusers? Why ignore the broader biblical principle of justice and righteousness that governs both genders?
As for Lot, your interpretation is completely misguided. Lot was not praised for offering his daughters, this act was never commanded, approved, or endorsed by God. It happened in a time before the Law was given and reflects Lot’s compromised judgment, not God’s will. In fact, the tragedy that followed, his daughters’ sin was a direct consequence of Lot's own choices. He chose Sodom for its fertile land and opportunities, not for its spiritual integrity. There is no evidence he spoke of God in his household. His silence, his compromise, and his passive leadership created a home where God’s voice was absent. The sins of his daughters reflect that spiritual vacuum.
And let’s be clear: Lot himself was spared not because of merit or righteousness, but because of Abraham’s intercession. That is what Scripture says. Twisting human failure into divine approval shows not faith, but cynicism.
Regarding the woman in Deuteronomy 25: the law was given to set a standard in a society where honor, restraint, and dignity were critical. The act described is not an act of noble defense but one of degrading violence. It reflects more on the woman's character than any divine injustice. Reactions under pressure reveal who we are, and this law sought to protect decency, not punish courage.
Now, to the heart of the matter: The Bible is composed of the Old Testament and the New Testament. A testament, by definition, is a will, a covenant. And in legal terms, when a person creates a new will, it automatically invalidates the old one. The former has no legal standing once the new one is in effect. Spiritually, the same applies: the New Testament, through Jesus Christ, fulfills and surpasses the Old Law.
So, if you truly seek to understand God's heart, start there. Quote Christ. Quote Paul. Show me the words of the One who laid down His life for all, without favoritism between male and female, Jew or Greek, slave or free.
Until then, your mockery is not a theological statement. It's a misuse of Scripture for provocation. You are free to question, but if you wish to do so honestly, begin with the full story, not fragments twisted to fit a cynical narrative. Until then, misusing Scripture to justify mockery is not theology, it’s manipulation. God welcomes honest questions. But He does not tolerate deliberate distortion.

I think you missed the point, her entire role is to unintentionally play herself in a gag.

In their minds, this vote is some kind of grand conspiracy, as if the organizers were KSH fans. But it’s also funny how their negative comments actually help right now. Because negative publicity is better than no publicity at all. A complete lack of attention, even negative , leads to an actor’s oblivion, especially when so many others are competing for the spotlight.

Oh, and a message for my favorite pseudo troll, ©h*msky.
Wow. That was… something. I’m sure in your head it sounded like a profound stream of interdimensional wisdom. You’ve assembled a sentence salad so tangled it’s convinced it’s profound. You seem to think you’re playing 4D chess with language, but if your goal was to impress with cryptic rambling, mission not quite accomplished.
Have you ever considered that maybe you’re traveling backwards? Probably not. But when multiple people tell you you’re drunk, the sensible thing would be to take a nap. Unless, of course, you’d rather keep stumbling around and making a scene.
Watching you try to sound deep is the best unintentional comedy I’ve seen all day. Never boring.

Shocking, indeed. Imagine people daring to think for themselves instead of blindly parroting the daily outrage script. Terrifying, I know.
But you know what’s even more shocking? That even after some of the so-called “evidence” pushed by KSR’s family through Gasey*n was publicly debunked, and the rest conveniently withheld from expert examination, there are still people clinging to those accusations like they’re carved in stone.
KSH still has fans because of his work: the kind that earned awards, recognition, and respect. That’s the difference between you and him: he built something real, while you’re just another anonymous voice tossing out lazy insults from behind a username no one will ever remember.
My advice? Do something useful, for yourself, ideally. Who knows, it might be your first step toward actual success… not the imaginary kind manufactured in echo chambers.

As Ruxi has already written, actor Kim Soo-hyun has maintained the top spot in the male actor category of Star Rankings for three consecutive months.
https://www.starnewskorea.com/star/2025/07/24/2025072414293823038
“Kim Soo-hyun's next work schedule is not yet set, but the trust he has built up over a long period of time and the unwavering support of fans around the world are raising expectations for his new beginning.”
https://www.msn.com/ko-kr/news/other/%ED%8C%AC%EB%93%A4%EC%9D%98-%EA%BE%B8%EC%A4%80%ED%95%9C-%EC%9D%91%EC%9B%90-%EA%B9%80%EC%88%98%ED%98%84-%EB%8D%B0%EB%B7%94-18%EC%A3%BC%EB%85%84%EC%97%90%EB%8F%84-%ED%9D%94%EB%93%A4%EB%A6%BC-%EC%97%86%EB%8A%94-%EC%A1%B4%EC%9E%AC%EA%B0%90/ar-AA1Jfsyq
I don’t place my trust carelessly in people, nor do I take words at face value. But I believe every person deserves honest respect for what they’ve given through their work, and Kim Soo Hyun is no exception.
I am not a blind follower of idols, nor am I someone easily moved by shallow praise. I am a man who knows when to bow my head, tip my hat, or stand in quiet respect for those whose merit truly calls for it. This is not weakness, it is the honor one gives freely to those who have earned it, and through that, I guard my own self-respect.
To all Kim Soo Hyun’s fans: Keep this spirit alive. You are proof that true respect and loyalty still exist in this world.

I think you should first inform yourself and call KSH’s fans dumb only after you have something concrete to show. Precisely because he was accused of having a relationship with her when she was a minor, he filed a defamation complaint, if you even know what that means.
In this situation, he must prove that the so-called evidence presented by KSR’s family is false; otherwise, he could be punished for making a false accusation. So ask yourself: why do you think he filed this complaint, and why hasn’t KSR’s family submitted their evidence for expert verification? Maybe try an intelligent answer for once.
Until the investigation is concluded, it would be wiser, and more respectful, to refrain from throwing around cheap insults and baseless claims. Nobody asked you to visit this page, so at least try to act accordingly.

Besides KSH appreciation, there’s another user who truly deserves our deepest "appreciation" for her tireless "efforts". Our irreplaceable ©h*msky really does earn at least a virtual bouquet of flowers, if only it were possible to reward such unmatched "dedication".
She works around the clock to reply the instant any KSH fan breathes online, despite the tiny detail that she’s supposedly blocked almost everyone. It was a bit too much for her yesterday, what with KSH’s debut celebration and all the fans greeting him, but otherwise she’s always ready for "work".
Her logic is so delightfully tangled that when she tries to untangle it, it’s like sorting through a drawer of mystery socks she doesn’t even remember owning. But she doesn’t give up, despite the result.
So, a tip before you log in: if you see any of her responses floating around, don’t bother deciphering them. They’re like background static on an old TV: pure noise, no signal. Her thinking compass is imaginary at best, but hey, at least she tries to look useful (for whom, I have no idea, but who cares). She’s convinced she’s on some kind of humanitarian mission. That alone deserves a prize.

Do you really think she’s capable of thinking that far ahead?

Hate to break it to you br*kendishԑs, but everyone, even old accounts you’ve blocked, can see your posts before logging in. So, the only thing proven here is how proudly you parade your confusion. Next time, try thinking before posting. It might save you the embarrassment.

It’s clear that anyone’s success can stir envy. But Kim Soo Hyun’s contribution cannot be denied. His films and dramas still air, still touch people, and hold ratings many can only dream of. That alone is proof enough of real merit.
It is never right to bury true talent under rumors and unproven accusations.
Yesterday, Kim Soo Hyun’s fans marked 18 years since an actor first stepped onto the stage and brought to life characters and moments that let people lose themselves in another world. For nearly two decades, his work has helped millions escape the burdens of everyday life, even if just for an hour, to dream more freely and feel more deeply.
The fans’ effort was moving because they know what he gave them in return: stories that linger, emotions that remind us we are human, and a new way to see the world. The credit for this belongs to the artist who made it possible through talent and dedication.
Nobody is perfect, but very few leave behind stories that live on in people’s hearts and stand as a lasting mark in their field.

To @b®ocken... or maybe block(usall)dishєs
Before posting this, you should have asked yourself: what drives you to waste your energy mocking people who’ve done you no harm? What malice makes you spit poison on a day meant for celebration?
These fans don’t need their idol’s help or recognition. They have every right to celebrate him in their own way. They don’t owe you an explanation for their loyalty, and they certainly don’t need your sneering approval.
Read your words again. Was this bile really necessary, or did you just need to drag others down to feel better about yourself? Try freeing yourself from that spite, then maybe you’ll understand what real respect looks like.

It’s not just KSH’s career that is amazing, nor just his performances, it’s also remarkable how, in these moments of crisis, his attitude has drawn people together who might never have stood by him otherwise.
I wouldn’t have written a single word here if the accusations hadn’t been so clearly exaggerated, aimed not at truth but at tearing him down. Perhaps I wouldn’t even have visited this page today if he hadn’t been blamed without evidence.
Some trials in life arrive not to defeat us, but to forge an even greater victory, to reveal a deeper well of support, and to show that what seems lost can be returned many times over.
This apparent setback is just a steep hill on the way to a higher place.

Today marks 18 years since his debut. 18 years of hard work, setbacks and triumphs, highs and lows, years of relentless effort, because no true victory is won through passivity.
People gather now to show respect for all they have gained through his films and dramas, moments of comfort, inspiration, and joy. And though there will always be a few who cast stones, they are few and insignificant: uninvited guests trying to spoil the celebration, when in truth, they lurk on the edges because no one calls them anywhere else.
But if there are uninvited guests, it means there is a celebration. If stones are thrown, it means there is an ocean worth troubling. If there are haters, it means there is love. And all of this only makes the dedication of KSH’s fans shine brighter.
Here’s to an anniversary filled with gratitude, and to many more years of stories yet to be told.

After 18 years, this is a new beginning: a renewed promise to stand for respect and integrity. May these values guide us forward, together.