That article made me so angry. It was the second of its kind in Korea Times. The first was titled "South Korea…
We hope that the new regulation on defamation through the spread of false information will put a stop to this type of “journalist.” Under the new rules, they can be required to pay compensation up to five times the damage caused. Considering the harm done to KSH through contract terminations, multiplied by five, I truly believe that this new regulation will have a real impact.
Some people falsely condemn Kim Soo-hyun (KSH), accusing him of having a relationship with KSR when she was a minor, and then go on to spread further false claims. Their main source? Everything screamed on YouTube by Garo Sero Research Institute. The irony is impressive. Kim Se-ui, (still) CEO of Garo Sero Research Institute, is not a truth-teller exposing lies. He is a repeat offender, professionally monetizing outrage, misinformation, and—when useful—the personal data of his own followers. For anyone who still believes Garo Sero is a beacon of truth, here is reality: After a prior conviction for spreading false information about the sitting president, Kim Se-ui was again convicted, this time for illegally using personal data obtained from his subscribers. Under the false pretext of recruiting an “election fraud monitoring group,” Garo Sero collected names and phone numbers from followers. About a year later, that same data was conveniently reused to promote Kim Se-ui’s own political campaign. Roughly 400 subscribers received campaign texts saying, “Please trust Kim Se-ui.” Subscribers who thought they were protecting democracy instead discovered they were part of a mailing list for his ambitions. Victims stated they were shocked, felt their personal information had been leaked, and suffered psychological distress, fearing further misuse. The 7th Criminal Division of the Seoul Central District Court agreed. That’s your “hero of the nation.” Not a misunderstanding. Not gossip. An actual criminal conviction for misusing personal data collected for another purpose. A different kind of Coupang—smaller scale. For now. Good luck to his subscribers. https://news.nate.com/view/20251223n14508 https://www.topstarnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=15924947 https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1008294887 https://biz.heraldcorp.com/article/10507924
The new year has not even started well and we can already see the first protagonists of the operetta "The Bat", but not by Johan Strauss-son but written by Ga Se-yon &comp. Imitating the announcement of a news story, the first character makes an unexpected advertisement for the tvN anniversary video. Considering that tvN has been involved in several scandals lately, it was expected that the anniversary clip would need to be spread in a unique way. Excellent choice. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/entertainment/20251211/koreas-entertainment-industry-struggles-as-celebrity-scandals-derail-productions We are now waiting on Kim Soo-hyun's page the other uninvited disguised characters from Act II. Let's see who appears first. Or rather, we know who will appear but let's see with which account...
In South Korea, I believe celebrities need their own agency to stand up against lies and unfair treatment. Otherwise,…
You're right. Besides, people and agents in the field are involved in this masquerade, in addition to politicians, because the rise of a man who was not in control of the system was already very disturbing.
Looking back on the year that has ended, I am grateful to all of you who chose to do good, to stand by those who are going through difficult situations and unfair accusations, and did not let yourselves be overwhelmed by hatred. You have proven that you are real people and I wish you all to be rewarded in 2026 according to the empathy you have shown. To those who left insulting, mocking messages, I wish you to discover the great love of God. To Kim Soo-hyun, I wish that these trials remain moments of polishing to shine brighter in the future. His approaching victory is certain. Happy New Year 2026!
Some updates: 1. On Monday, the Gangnam Police announced that they will soon complete the investigation, having also received the results of the forensic examination of the voice recording. 2. Although the source is unknown, media reports have stated that the forensic examination results are inconclusive because the original recording was not submitted.
Garo0 has announced that he possesses the original recording and will release it in full. We cannot afford to wait. The only evidence on which the deceased’s family based their complaint against Kim Soo-hyun is the audio recording. If this recording is deemed inconclusive, it will be excluded from the case file and will have no impact on the outcome of the investigation—exactly as already occurred in the case initiated following Kim Soo-hyun’s own complaint. For Kim Soo-hyun, this situation is not decisive, as his complaints concern other matters, and the exclusion of this single recording does not negate the acts allegedly committed by Kim Se-ui. But for KSR's family that was the only evidence! However, if Kim Se-ui continues to claim that he possesses the original recording and intends to release it, there is nothing preventing him from submitting the original to the case file opened based on the family’s complaint. Or have they already withdrawn their complaint because they know the voice recording is fake and manipulated with AI? If he fails to submit it, this will be further proof that he is merely bluffing rather than genuinely seeking justice for the deceased. Therefore, we call on everyone who truly wants justice for Kim Sae-ron: request that Garo0 submit the original voice recording to the authorities. We support you.
" It is also noted that some former YG colleagues of the deceased have publicly posted images and promoted…
A careful investigation can uncover many clues ... There’s a saying: the fence may look freshly painted on the outside, but a leopard is hiding inside. That’s what the real culprit is like. I think many people know the truth, yet the only one being blamed is KSH. Because he is an easy target.
Another article completely disconnected from reality and with no relation to Kim Soo-hyun. It is clearly a desperate…
Everyone is waiting for the results. However, regardless of when they come out, the decision will not be final. The police will complete their investigation and issue a recommendation—either to indict or not to indict—and then forward the case to the prosecutor. The prosecutor will review the file to determine whether the investigation was thorough, lawful, and complete. If the prosecutor finds that the investigation was inadequate or that certain aspects were not examined, the case can be sent back to the police for further investigation. If the prosecutor concludes that the investigation was properly conducted and fully completed, they may uphold the police’s conclusion and officially notify the parties. Any party dissatisfied with the prosecutor’s decision may file an objection. The chief prosecutor (or a higher-ranking supervising prosecutor) will review the objection, and will give a decision.That decision can still be appealed in court. (There is also the possibility that the objection will be upheld, in which case the file may be returned to the police for additional investigation.) The court, in turn, may either return the case for further investigation or uphold the prosecutor’s decision. So there is still a long way to go. It is too early to feel exhausted—I am sorry to say this. Everyone must stay strong until the end. But it is likely that only the Gangnam Police might delay the process. I am confident that the prosecution and the court will proceed more quickly. It will be a good ending though . Let’s not forget: “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.” ( Friedrich Nietzsche)
In recent days, various statements and presentations of alleged “new evidence” have circulated, issued by the lawyer representing the deceased’s family. Why are these materials, including the so-called extract from the forensic report, legally irrelevant? 1. The addressee of the memorandum and letter is unknown, and neither document mentions Kim Soo Hyun by name. Any interpretation is therefore speculative. At that time,s he was affiliated with YG and had colleagues who entered military service concurrently(guess), so these documents cannot constitute evidence in themselves. 2. The cats’ names appear to be part of a comedic reference. Even if the family attempts to connect them to the drama The Moon Embracing the Sun, they could just as easily be linked to Moonlight Drawn by Clouds, which would arguably be a closer fit. It is also noted that some former YG colleagues of the deceased have publicly posted images and promoted outfits emphasizing moon-and-cloud motifs; several of those individuals appear to bear tattoos with similar motifs. So, the reference to cats name is entirely inconclusive. 3. The so-called “forensic report,” which now appears in a modified version compared to earlier presentation of the kakao talk messages, is merely a document devoid of evidentiary or legal value. Proper forensic reporting requires strict adherence to procedural and legal standards, including transparency, preservation of digital evidence, and compliance with personal data protection laws such as the PIPA. Additionally, guidelines from authorities such as the KFTC require accurate reporting—both technical and non-technical—verification of tools used, and proper safeguarding of personal data. Furthermore, a partial forensic report from an active investigation cannot be disclosed. Any disclosure requires authorization from competent authorities, such as public prosecutors or judicial police officers (NPA or PO). This alone demonstrates that the table presented by the family does not originate from the investigative file but rather from the family's own “forensick :) specialists.”
It is evident that both the family and Garo0 have consistently introduced materials that fail to meet even minimal evidentiary standards. Aware of the weakness of their position in the legal proceedings, they now rely on shaping public perception through misrepresentations and selective disclosures. Their objective is to create the false impression that the investigation was flawed, rather than to present verifiable facts. Behind them stands the individual who in fact maintained a relationship with the deceased when she was still a minor. The day will surely come when this aspect is brought to light.
They are trying to blame Kim Soo Hyun for having a relation with the deceased, but he wasn't the only one (and it was when she was an adult). Just because someone passed by a street where an accident happened doesn't mean that person caused it, right? There has to be evidence that directly incriminates him. The rest are stories for the public, hungry for fictional sensationalism.
6 
11 
The irony is impressive.
Kim Se-ui, (still) CEO of Garo Sero Research Institute, is not a truth-teller exposing lies. He is a repeat offender, professionally monetizing outrage, misinformation, and—when useful—the personal data of his own followers.
For anyone who still believes Garo Sero is a beacon of truth, here is reality:
After a prior conviction for spreading false information about the sitting president, Kim Se-ui was again convicted, this time for illegally using personal data obtained from his subscribers. Under the false pretext of recruiting an “election fraud monitoring group,” Garo Sero collected names and phone numbers from followers. About a year later, that same data was conveniently reused to promote Kim Se-ui’s own political campaign.
Roughly 400 subscribers received campaign texts saying, “Please trust Kim Se-ui.”
Subscribers who thought they were protecting democracy instead discovered they were part of a mailing list for his ambitions.
Victims stated they were shocked, felt their personal information had been leaked, and suffered psychological distress, fearing further misuse.
The 7th Criminal Division of the Seoul Central District Court agreed.
That’s your “hero of the nation.”
Not a misunderstanding.
Not gossip.
An actual criminal conviction for misusing personal data collected for another purpose.
A different kind of Coupang—smaller scale. For now.
Good luck to his subscribers.
https://news.nate.com/view/20251223n14508
https://www.topstarnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=15924947
https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1008294887
https://biz.heraldcorp.com/article/10507924
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/entertainment/20251211/koreas-entertainment-industry-struggles-as-celebrity-scandals-derail-productions
We are now waiting on Kim Soo-hyun's page the other uninvited disguised characters from Act II. Let's see who appears first. Or rather, we know who will appear but let's see with which account...
1. On Monday, the Gangnam Police announced that they will soon complete the investigation, having also received the results of the forensic examination of the voice recording.
2. Although the source is unknown, media reports have stated that the forensic examination results are inconclusive because the original recording was not submitted.
Garo0 has announced that he possesses the original recording and will release it in full.
We cannot afford to wait. The only evidence on which the deceased’s family based their complaint against Kim Soo-hyun is the audio recording. If this recording is deemed inconclusive, it will be excluded from the case file and will have no impact on the outcome of the investigation—exactly as already occurred in the case initiated following Kim Soo-hyun’s own complaint.
For Kim Soo-hyun, this situation is not decisive, as his complaints concern other matters, and the exclusion of this single recording does not negate the acts allegedly committed by Kim Se-ui. But for KSR's family that was the only evidence!
However, if Kim Se-ui continues to claim that he possesses the original recording and intends to release it, there is nothing preventing him from submitting the original to the case file opened based on the family’s complaint. Or have they already withdrawn their complaint because they know the voice recording is fake and manipulated with AI?
If he fails to submit it, this will be further proof that he is merely bluffing rather than genuinely seeking justice for the deceased.
Therefore, we call on everyone who truly wants justice for Kim Sae-ron: request that Garo0 submit the original voice recording to the authorities.
We support you.
The police will complete their investigation and issue a recommendation—either to indict or not to indict—and then forward the case to the prosecutor. The prosecutor will review the file to determine whether the investigation was thorough, lawful, and complete.
If the prosecutor finds that the investigation was inadequate or that certain aspects were not examined, the case can be sent back to the police for further investigation. If the prosecutor concludes that the investigation was properly conducted and fully completed, they may uphold the police’s conclusion and officially notify the parties.
Any party dissatisfied with the prosecutor’s decision may file an objection. The chief prosecutor (or a higher-ranking supervising prosecutor) will review the objection, and will give a decision.That decision can still be appealed in court. (There is also the possibility that the objection will be upheld, in which case the file may be returned to the police for additional investigation.)
The court, in turn, may either return the case for further investigation or uphold the prosecutor’s decision.
So there is still a long way to go. It is too early to feel exhausted—I am sorry to say this. Everyone must stay strong until the end. But it is likely that only the Gangnam Police might delay the process. I am confident that the prosecution and the court will proceed more quickly. It will be a good ending though .
Let’s not forget: “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.”
( Friedrich Nietzsche)
Why are these materials, including the so-called extract from the forensic report, legally irrelevant?
1. The addressee of the memorandum and letter is unknown, and neither document mentions Kim Soo Hyun by name. Any interpretation is therefore speculative. At that time,s he was affiliated with YG and had colleagues who entered military service concurrently(guess), so these documents cannot constitute evidence in themselves.
2. The cats’ names appear to be part of a comedic reference. Even if the family attempts to connect them to the drama The Moon Embracing the Sun, they could just as easily be linked to Moonlight Drawn by Clouds, which would arguably be a closer fit. It is also noted that some former YG colleagues of the deceased have publicly posted images and promoted outfits emphasizing moon-and-cloud motifs; several of those individuals appear to bear tattoos with similar motifs. So, the reference to cats name is entirely inconclusive.
3. The so-called “forensic report,” which now appears in a modified version compared to earlier presentation of the kakao talk messages, is merely a document devoid of evidentiary or legal value. Proper forensic reporting requires strict adherence to procedural and legal standards, including transparency, preservation of digital evidence, and compliance with personal data protection laws such as the PIPA. Additionally, guidelines from authorities such as the KFTC require accurate reporting—both technical and non-technical—verification of tools used, and proper safeguarding of personal data.
Furthermore, a partial forensic report from an active investigation cannot be disclosed. Any disclosure requires authorization from competent authorities, such as public prosecutors or judicial police officers (NPA or PO). This alone demonstrates that the table presented by the family does not originate from the investigative file but rather from the family's own “forensick :) specialists.”
It is evident that both the family and Garo0 have consistently introduced materials that fail to meet even minimal evidentiary standards. Aware of the weakness of their position in the legal proceedings, they now rely on shaping public perception through misrepresentations and selective disclosures. Their objective is to create the false impression that the investigation was flawed, rather than to present verifiable facts. Behind them stands the individual who in fact maintained a relationship with the deceased when she was still a minor. The day will surely come when this aspect is brought to light.
They are trying to blame Kim Soo Hyun for having a relation with the deceased, but he wasn't the only one (and it was when she was an adult). Just because someone passed by a street where an accident happened doesn't mean that person caused it, right? There has to be evidence that directly incriminates him. The rest are stories for the public, hungry for fictional sensationalism.