Sunny Day

Your suggestion about a delay/”drag of the case” is completely absurd. There is no criminal complaint against Kim Soo-hyun that could be delayed. On the contrary, every existing complaint has been filed by him, so any delay only harms him, not benefits him. Claiming otherwise not only shows a lack of understanding of the situation but also spreads dangerous misinformation. Before posting reckless statements that incite hatred, at least check the facts.

It is unacceptable to accuse someone when you already know that not a single piece of real evidence exists. Worse, the so-called “evidence” that was presented has been proven fabricated. Persisting in such false accusations is not only morally wrong but also constitutes a serious act of defamation.

In a new post today, attorney Sang-rock Kho clarified that the issue centers in Ga Se-yeon and Kim Se-ui’s deliberate manipulation. He stated that Gaseyeon distorted evidence by presenting photos from the deceased’s adult years (2019–2020) as if they were from her teenage years. Kho emphasized that these photos in fact prove the relationship began only after the deceased entered university, and that no evidence supports claims of a prior six-year relationship. He concluded that such a relationship never existed and urged the public not to be misled by baseless fabrications. Attorney Sang-rock Kho also presented the photos, which include exact timestamps showing when they were taken.
“Many misunderstandings remain regarding this matter. However, the central issue is the fabrication of evidence by Gaseyeon. Gaseyeon presented photos taken after the two parties began a relationship as adults, as if they were proof of a relationship during the deceased’s teenage years. This is not merely a distortion; it constitutes a serious act of manipulating evidence to mislead and provoke the public. In fact, all of the photos disclosed by Gaseyeon are from the deceased’s adult years—specifically, between December 2019 (the freshman year of college) and the following spring, when the two were in a relationship (see ‘Timeline of Actual Relationship’). Far from supporting Gaseyeon’s claims, these photos are objective evidence that the relationship began only after the deceased became an adult. There are more than a dozen photos concentrated during this actual period of dating. Yet, if Gaseyeon’s claim were true—that the relationship lasted six years starting from middle school—then how is it that not a single photo exists from those earlier years? Although Gaseyeon has claimed that “thousands of photos exist,” not a single additional piece of evidence has been presented to date. Nor will they ever be—because they simply do not exist. In conclusion, the actor never, even for a single day, had a romantic relationship with the deceased prior to her entering university as an adult. Therefore, no matter what kind of frame Gaseyeon attempts to impose without evidence, there is no reason to be swayed by it. What did not happen, simply did not happen.
Attorney Sang-rock Kho, Legal Representative for Actor Suhyun Kim”
https://www.youtube.com/@%EC%A7%84%EA%B2%A9%EC%9D%98%EA%B3%A0%EB%B3%80/posts

In a new post today, attorney Sang-rock Kho emphasized that the essence of this case does not concern actor Kim Soo-hyun’s private life, but rather Ga Se-yeon and Kim Se-ui, who incited the public through manipulation and lies. Attorney Sang-rock Kho also presented the photos, which include exact timestamps showing when they were taken.
“Many misunderstandings remain regarding this matter. However, the central issue is the fabrication of evidence by Gaseyeon. Gaseyeon presented photos taken after the two parties began a relationship as adults, as if they were proof of a relationship during the deceased’s teenage years. This is not merely a distortion; it constitutes a serious act of manipulating evidence to mislead and provoke the public. In fact, all of the photos disclosed by Gaseyeon are from the deceased’s adult years—specifically, between December 2019 (the freshman year of college) and the following spring, when the two were in a relationship (see ‘Timeline of Actual Relationship’). Far from supporting Gaseyeon’s claims, these photos are objective evidence that the relationship began only after the deceased became an adult. There are more than a dozen photos concentrated during this actual period of dating. Yet, if Gaseyeon’s claim were true—that the relationship lasted six years starting from middle school—then how is it that not a single photo exists from those earlier years? Although Gaseyeon has claimed that “thousands of photos exist,” not a single additional piece of evidence has been presented to date. Nor will they ever be—because they simply do not exist. In conclusion, the actor never, even for a single day, had a romantic relationship with the deceased prior to her entering university as an adult. Therefore, no matter what kind of frame Gaseyeon attempts to impose without evidence, there is no reason to be swayed by it. What did not happen, simply did not happen.
Attorney Sang-rock Kho, Legal Representative for Actor Suhyun Kim”
https://www.youtube.com/@%EC%A7%84%EA%B2%A9%EC%9D%98%EA%B3%A0%EB%B3%80/posts

Unlike what some may suggest, I actually know this building, and it is not some abandoned, broken-down structure. It is an ordinary office building that hosts the headquarters and work points of several companies across various fields. While it is true that only one floor belongs to the Gold Medalist agency, this in no way diminishes its activity. As everyone knows, the nature of such work involves extensive travel and online operations, things that can be managed from virtually anywhere. Anyone who truly wishes to verify this can do so, since the address is public, and even a simple look at Google Maps or Street View will clarify the matter.
What truly harms the artists represented by the agency, however, are the repeated and unfounded attacks in the media and online. These accusations, while lacking substance, have real consequences, not only for the agency but for the actors themselves. I have said it before: there is an ongoing and fierce competition between agencies, and this constant denigration is simply a tactic to eliminate rivals from the market.
If you examine the situation more carefully, you’ll notice that many actors eventually try to establish their own agencies. Why? On one hand, because their retirement often does not coincide with official retirement age, and they must build financial security for their later years. On the other hand, because too many agencies lack empathy for the people behind the celebrity—forgetting that actors are human beings, vulnerable and not always capable of being endlessly overworked.
Take, for example, actor Lee Soo-hyuk’s recent fan meeting in Hangzhou, China, where he endured twelve hours without air conditioning. The agency apologized and explained it as a mistake, hopefully just an isolated error, not a recurring practice. And this is far from the only case. Many actors face exhausting conditions on set due to tight filming schedules, with little regard for their well-being.
That is why, out of respect for actors and their work, I refuse to condemn them, or even their agencies, too hastily when mistakes occur, and certainly not when it comes to false rumors. In the end, it is always the actors who bear the greatest burden.
So I ask: what is truly the purpose of spreading negative messages about GM, knowing full well that this agency represents more than one actor? Where does this hostility come from, and what is the real goal behind it?

Seoul Central District Court Civil Division 68, on the 1st of next month, will announce the verdict on the case of Mr. Eun's
request for the performance of the name transfer procedure against Garosero Research Institute... 2:00 PM, Room 562, East Building
https://www.pennmike.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=108431
The outcome of this case could significantly impact the future operations and leadership of Garosero Research Institute. Observers are keenly awaiting the court's decision, as it may influence the company's direction and its involvement in ongoing controversies.
In related news, the controversy involving actor Kim Soo Hyun, Garosero Research Institute has been at the center of this issue, with allegations and legal actions intensifying. The court's upcoming verdict may have broader implications, potentially affecting the YouTube channel's future activities and its role in the ongoing defamation case.

For those who educate themselves exclusively from sensationalist media headlines, thus demonstrating an astonishing "level of intelligence", and who seem to feed on negative news with a personality steeped in schadenfreude, I have a very simple message: before posting derogatory remarks about Kim Soo-hyun or Gold Medalist, please make sure you understand the meaning of the terms you are using.
Allegations that Gold Medalist "embezzled" its actors’ earnings or operates through a "fake paper cutout ownership company" are not only legally baseless, but frankly, laughable. One could argue about underpayment of actors or contractual disputes, such matters are common in the entertainment industry, but to invoke the crime of embezzlement is a completely different matter. As for the supposed "fake ownership structure," the claim is so absurd it hardly deserves comment.
For clarity: embezzlement is defined under Articles 355–358 of the Korean Criminal Act. It involves, for example, a person who has custody of another’s property and unlawfully appropriates it, or a person who, while administering another’s business, gains unlawful pecuniary advantage in breach of duty, thereby causing financial loss. Unless such legal criteria are met, shouting "embezzlement" amounts to little more than empty noise.
If there truly were financial irregularities at Gold Medalist—whether embezzlement, tax evasion, or related crimes—there would already be a criminal investigation or conviction, as seen in other cases (such as that of Hwang Jung-eum). In fact, Gold Medalist has clearly stated that it is an unlisted company, and the rumors surrounding it are based on treating it as if it were a listed company, which makes no sense whatsoever. Comparing the accounting of an unlisted company to that of a listed company betrays a fundamental misunderstanding: they operate under entirely different frameworks. Listed entities follow K-IFRS (Korean International Financial Reporting Standards), whereas unlisted companies may follow K-GAAP (Korean Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). Listing is not a legal obligation unless certain statutory thresholds are met, and Gold Medalist does not meet them. Remaining unlisted is therefore a perfectly lawful choice, sometimes even a strategic one to avoid unnecessary external interference.
Of course, disputes between actors and management agencies are not unusual, and large companies in particular often face internal disagreements over business operations. But none of that equates to Gold Medalist engaging in illegality, and there is no official accusation or finding to suggest otherwise.
So, before rushing to celebrate supposed scandals, take a moment to document yourself properly. After all, the media thrives on the public’s ignorance, and you wouldn’t want to be their unpaid marketing tool, would you?

Most of those who post such messages do not even realize that they are being used or manipulated to serve the interests of others. It is likely that penalties for such comments will become harsher, and there may come a time when expressing oneself freely—even for a legitimate, real cause—will be restricted, as is already the case in some countries.
The global boom of Korean movies and dramas has aroused envy and sparked conflicts that may not work in Korea’s favor, and hate speech only accelerates the decline of authentic, high-quality Korean films and dramas.Does anyone truly understand the harsh reality of the authentic Korean film industry?
Minister Choi highlighted this at his first press conference since taking office, held at the Modu Arts Theater in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul:
"The reality I observed, heard, and felt while visiting various sites was so different from the glamorous image portrayed that I felt embarrassed and bewildered. The film industry ecosystem is collapsing to the point where filmmakers cannot make a living. Despite requests from foreign production companies for joint productions, the government has no budget to provide any support whatsoever. K-culture does not necessarily have to be 'Made in Korea'; it could also be 'Made with Korea,' yet there is no budget to support 'With Korea.'”
https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20250904089600005?section=entertainment/all
If we also consider that former President Donald Trump recently stated he would impose a 100% tariff on all films produced overseas that are then exported to the U.S., the Korean film industry faces a very real risk of collapse.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-impose-100-tariff-movies-made-outside-country-2025-09-29/

As I wrote a month ago, I expected a suspended sentence, which naturally comes with a probationary period. If people would stop judging and accusing others as though they were flawless, Hwang Jung Eum’s career could move forward. No one is perfect, and the mistake she made (without being an expert in financial matters) is a mistake anyone could have made. As an actress she is amazing.
What truly matters is learning, growing, and continuing to pursue one’s passion despite setbacks.

I understand your concerns, and I share them. However, if there were any illegal activity, an investigation would likely already be underway.
It is true that some agencies take advantage of actors or fail to represent them properly, as was the case with actor Lee Soo-hyuk’s recent fan meeting in Hangzhou, China.
GM has clearly stated that the percentage offered to actors is net of all related expenses. I understand this includes rent, team support, clothing, and other professional costs. GM can also handle the taxes owed by the actor, ensuring that the percentage received is truly clean and net.
In other agencies, while the percentage might appear higher, actors often bear significant additional expenses. I have seen cases where individuals expected higher earnings but ultimately earned less than before—but these were actors not associated with GM .
Of course, actors are free to consider other offers if they find an agency willing to cover the breach of contract with their current agency.
That said, tensions between local and larger agencies, including foreign or publicly listed companies, can sometimes spark rumors intended to discredit certain agencies. These situations can be risky for actors.

Since the very first posts on this page, I have emphasized that being an actor is far from easy, and the entertainment industry is not always the most rewarding. We only hear about some of the tragic stories, but behind the scenes there are countless other struggles and challenges. That is why, at the very least, we as the audience should offer support, kindness, and encouragement, because before anything else, actors are human beings, and our respect can make their journey a little brighter.

Speaking of Lee Chae-min, let us not forget that his recent breakthrough was possible largely thanks to Gold Medalist, which secured his role in Bon Appétit, Your Majesty. According to IZE, filming began on January 23, 2025. Just ten days earlier, on January 13, The Korea Times reported that Park had officially stepped down from the series, while Lee Chae-min was already being considered as his replacement. The drama premiered on tvN on August 23, 2025—only three days after his contract with Gold Medalist ended.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bon_App%C3%A9tit,_Your_Majesty
The precise reason for his agency change is, frankly, irrelevant. What matters is that Lee Chae-min rose to fame while under the management of Gold Medalist, combined with his undeniable talent and hard work. We can only hope his future career will continue to shine just as brightly.
Meanwhile, Gold Medalist remains far from idle. This year alone, nearly all of its actors have been involved in various projects, several of which have already been released. True, the company faced setbacks due to the controversies surrounding Kim Soo-hyun, but such turbulence is hardly unprecedented in the entertainment industry. In the end, Gold Medalist will recover its losses and move forward.
And really, while Gold Medalist is busy producing projects and managing successful actors, others somehow find endless free time to roam from site to site posting hateful messages. The difference speaks for itself.

As I wrote a month ago, I expected a suspended sentence, which naturally comes with a probationary period. If people would stop judging and accusing others as though they were flawless, Hwang Jung Eum’s career could move forward. No one is perfect, and the mistake she made (without being an expert in financial matters) is a mistake anyone could have made. As an actress she is amazing.
What truly matters is learning, growing, and continuing to pursue one’s passion despite setbacks.

To clarify: the case is not under reinvestigation, nor is it simply going back and forth between the police and the prosecution. A reinvestigation presupposes that the police have already reached an initial conclusion. In this situation, however, the police have not yet completed their investigation, and we still have no official findings since March, which is, in itself, highly questionable.

I have said it before, and I will say it again: his fans are truly admirable. Even after so much time has passed, they continue to support him unwaveringly. Some fans from abroad have even sent letters to the Ministry of Justice to highlight the delay in resolving the case. Such delays are not without consequence under the law, a delay in resolving a case can be formally complained about, and it may carry legal implications for the responsible authorities.

Analyzing Kim Soo Hyun’s conduct from a legal perspective, it can be said that he has maintained an admirable and cautious attitude. Despite the hostility of those who wish him harm, it is a matter of record that there were companies willing to renew contracts with him—even if not large corporations—but he declined such opportunities until all ongoing proceedings were concluded.
He has also taken active legal steps by filing complaints against the spread of false information. It is important to note that such complaints are reviewed with utmost rigor: if even one essential element of the contested information proves accurate, the entire complaint may be dismissed.
Under Korean law on defamation through the dissemination of false facts, “falsity” is evaluated by whether the essential parts of a statement correspond with objective truth (Supreme Court Decision 2013Do12430, among others). Minor inaccuracies or exaggerations do not render a statement false if its essential content is true. However, if the essential elements are not true, then the statement is considered false. Since proving a speaker’s knowledge of falsity directly is often difficult, courts examine objective circumstances such as the specificity of the claims, the existence of supporting evidence, the reliability of sources, the manner in which the information was obtained, the speaker’s position, timing, and the potential impact of dissemination.
A legal post published today by Attorney Sang-rock Kho provides significant clarity regarding the alleged correspondence.
Attorney Sang-rock Kho wrote:
The postcard dated November 1, 2019 was sent when the deceased was an adult (a first-year university student in the fall). Its content shows that the two had only recently begun a relationship. Pledges such as “I’ll nag you a lot to show I care” or “Even if we argue, I’ll apologize first and yield” are typical expressions found at the very beginning of a romantic relationship.
The letter sent on June 9, 2018 during military service was not a love letter. Reading it from start to finish, the actor recounts his own military life at length, briefly says he misses the recipient just before closing, and then immediately speaks about what he plans to do alone after discharge. This is not how a man in the military writes to a current romantic partner; in fact, if a partner received such a letter, it would be understandable for them to feel upset.

In light of the above, Attorney Kho’s legal interpretation makes it clear that the narrative of a relationship is unsupported by evidence and is instead a product of misrepresentation.
Creating or spreading false rumors, as Gar0zer0 did, is not an act of courage or truth-telling; it is an act of harm. The law does not tolerate falsehoods, and those who exploit lies for attention or influence must understand that they will face consequences. This case should serve as a turning point in how defamation and cyberbullying based on false information are addressed, with punishments strong enough to deter others from committing the same misconduct.

Actually, in South Korea, Kim Soo Hyun is known as a model of integrity, and even in the midst of such controversy, he is still supported by his fans. You confirm it.

If there was legislative activity on August 26, 2025, in South Korea concerning online content regulation, particularly targeting entertainment YouTubers, there have been no significant updates since then regarding these initiatives aimed at regulating YouTubers who exploit celebrities' personal lives. The National Assembly's subcommittee on science, technology, information, broadcasting, and communications, which was scheduled to review the petition on October 10, 2025, has not yet convened.

In the meantime, public concern over the issue persists. For instance, a Facebook post from the Digital Rights Foundation, dated September 19, 2025, highlights the ongoing public interest and concern regarding the regulation of harmful YouTube content about celebrities. The post underscores the importance of addressing this issue to protect individuals from exploitation and harm.

Additionally, the controversy surrounding Johnny Somali continues to draw attention. As of August 13, 2025, Somali faces multiple charges in South Korea. His trial commenced on March 7, 2025, and the next trial date is scheduled for October 29, 2025.

These developments indicate that, while legislative action is pending, public scrutiny and legal proceedings related to harmful online content continue to evolve in South Korea.

While browsing the news, I was once again impressed by Kim Soo-hyun’s fans. In August, he ranked first in the overall actor brand rankings with 239,832 points, a massive leap of 129,809 from the previous week. The balanced strength of votes, sponsorships, comments, and readership reaffirmed both his fandom’s power and his own influence, proving he set a new standard for comprehensive brand impact.
https://www.topstarnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=15811804

In July of last year, Mr. A posted several posts on social media disparaging the appearances of the group members and mocking the real people who portrayed them.
The Uijeongbu District Court ruled that insulting virtual idols constitutes defamation, ordering a netizen to pay 100,000 won in damages to each of five plaintiffs. The court emphasized that in the metaverse era, avatars are a form of self-expression and identity, so mocking them also harms the real people behind them.
https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20250918044100060?section=entertainment/all
Ironically, while even avatars receive swift judicial protection, Kim Soo-hyun’s complaints remain stuck at the police investigation stage - meaning his case won’t even reach the courtroom by next March or April, a full year after he first filed the complaint.
Anyway, this is a positive sign for defamation cases.