Maggi64

Thank you! You are the bomb!

Thank you. But I could've sworn I heard people refer to Chai Jidan as "Mame". I guess I was wrong.

Where were the 3 in Eng? I only found Ep 1 and 2 in English.

Thank you! But I don't speak Japanese. I guess I'll have to wait for it to come to Amazon US. In the mean time, there is one ep out on Billibi in English that I caught.

I keep seeing that this was written/produced by Mame. But this is a Thai production, and isn't Mame the Chinese woman who wrote Addicted?

I don't get it, In blocked Wang's kiss. But then we see then awake in bed, together, with no clothes. Doesn't this mean they just had sex?

People are saying this is on Amazon Prime. But I have Amazon and cannot find it. Is it under a different title name or something?

I know, I was so surprised that they kissed! It felt like it was not going to happen, but I'm glad it finally did. It was a quick kiss, closed mouthed from what I could tell, but at least it happened. :)

Nothing wrong with being a fujoshi. That's why I am reclaiming the word. It's about us liking the drama inherent to gay love stories. You do understand the concept of drama, don't you? These stories have more conflict and drama. The stakes are higher for the characters to cross the line. This makes the stories compelling. Again, it's about the STORY not about sexualizing male-on-male relationships. We could get sex with gay porn, but do not. See?

Well, it differs from Minato in that the two characters are the same age when the hookup happens. The show went out of its way to have the character say in the present, "We are the same age now."

Otherwise, your point about kids forming strong attachments in the face of trauma is quite right.

Sorry, I will change that. I was just assuming so you are right. Incidentally, a sexual fetish would mean we watch gay porn, which we clearly do not. It's the stories that we want. It's the human drama. A story of two men hooking up simply has more conflict and drama, especially in Asia where homophobia is still ripe. Look at the distance the Japanese character had to cross in Old Fashioned Cupcake. Crossing the line for a taboo relationship is what made the show compelling. See?

It's bizarre for one to see a child in what is clearly a man's body. Really, I gotta wonder what show this person is watching.

BTW, I love our community of BL fans. If we are weird as this person said, then it's a good kind of weird, lol. I'm reclaiming the word just as fujoshis reclaimed the negative "rotten girl" to be, instead, a positive nomenclature. We are weird fujoshis and proud of it!

How the hell are you seeing an adult with a little boy? It won't be one child and one adult when the hook up happens. By then, they will both be ADULTS. How can you not see this? Unless, of course, you are watching a different show.

Yep, and this kind of plot with differing ages happens in all time travel movies. I don't think she gets the concept of time travel. One cannot be the same age if it's 10 years on the past. They would be, um, 10 years younger. How is this tough to get?

So what? They are adults when the hook up will happen. Moreover, it's a time loop story so it has to feature a past, which means the people have to have different ages from past to present with one younger and the other older. If you can't buy that, then you can't watch the show. But everyone else is watching the show as it's intended to be watched, and that's why they are "not talking about it" as you said. You are the only one seeing it this way cuz you knocked yourself out to see it this way.

I just checked and he looked for the thank you and asked himself, "Is it still there?" So this means that it was there and, hence, he really did write it while the guy was still alive. But the guy had to have been murdered because the present tense man also went to his grave. So yes, the murderer must show up again to kill him, because the logic dictates that he's dead in the present time. But if abductor returns it is odd, cuz abductors usually grab any kid, and don't target the same kid repeatedly.

Well, as adults they'd be 10 years apart. No big deal for a 25 year old and a 35 year old to date.

Was the thank you there? I need to check again, because if it is, then that means the guy lived and the little boy went to his house afterwards when he wrote it. But wait, if the guy lived, then the guy would still be alive right now yet he went to his grave as an adult, so he's dead. See, that's why one can't change events in the past; the logic won't work.

Wait, he survives the abductor this time around, so does that mean he changed the time continuum? Or was the murder not this time around and the murderer will show up again later? Maybe he'll show up on Jan 30th? Because the dorm mgr said the dorm closes on that date.

I am confused. Please help! lol

Totally agree Steven. The screenplay is loose and in some instances just plain sloppy. For instance, they dropped 3 things that were introduced in Ep 1 as if they'd simply forgotten them. They forgot the student council plot, they forgot about that kid Chris who was pissed at the class star in the beginning of Ep 1, and then they forgot about Ray's crossdressing. Those are some pretty big "Oops, we forgot!" Well, the audience remembered. At least I did.