I've never heard that giving birth leads to crippled legs. Really want an explanation for this.
Yue: Obviously, you have not come as far as some of us. I have just watched ep 17 but the reveal (re the legs) was in ep 15 or 16 (I can't remember without looking.). Where are you watching it? Do you want to wait or shall I send you a link?
nobody cares about your opinion when novel readers said she fits he yan character
Uvimolla: Everybody has likes or dislikes. Also, although many people (who don't even know that know that they are doing it) can overly idealise (or denigrate) a person or a character, it does not make them delusional.
Delusional means characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgements about external reality that are held despite 'incontrovertible evidence' to the contrary, as a symptom of serious mental illness.
As likes and dislikes are very subjective, how can one provide objective evidence to the contrary? Had you a basic understanding of the word, you would know this.
In ep. 41 the FL finds the prince'e body in the lake. Which prince - the good one or the bad one? When was he…
I must have missed just that one epispode and, because of the break, forgotten what was happening. Thanks for your reply. I'll go back and watch that episode.
I have seen much better and seen much worse. A few incidental extras thrown in to show townspeople, palace staff and, oh yes, teashop customers, living their daily lives, would have given this boring drama a a better sense of realism. P.S. I have only watched up to ep 8. Surprise, surprise -townspeople appeared twice for a second or two in ep. 12.
I have just finished episode 42 - after a break - because I had difficulty finding some episodes. I am confused…
In ep. 41 the FL finds the prince'e body in the lake. Which prince - the good one or the bad one? When was he killed? (and) Who killed him? What happened to the other prince? I must have missed an episode - or two. Can anybody please tell me which episode(s) cover these events - either version will do.
I have just finished episode 42 - after a break - because I had difficulty finding some episodes. I am confused about something that I seem to have missed. See spoiler.
it's the most weirdest Chinese series I've watched so far. The beginning is very odd, the ML tries to rape his…
"your pov suggests rape is actually ONLY rape when a woman is capable to fight back ..."
Did you mean to write, "IS NOT"? You have it back to front. Your comment would make more sense had you thought that I had said, 'women who CAN fight back can NOT be raped'. Regardless...
Er...No. It does not suggest that at all. I was saying, in response to your comment, that there was nobody else there to pull him off of her. YOUR use of the continuous tense 'TRYING' implies that he failed to complete the action. She did not have the strength to stop him. so, who or what, from your perspective, was physically strong enough to stop him? You say that it was because he was interrupted every time. I shall have to watch it again to verify/disprove your claim but, until then, my comment about him stopping because he chose to (for whatever reason) stands. If he were really meant to rape her, he would have suceeded when the other person(s) (who did nothing, by the way) left him to resume his so called 'TRYI NG'.
Also, I did not give MY point of view - except for the last comment about where I would kick him. As a retired teacher, my comment was mostly addressing your terminology from a linguistic, etymological, and legal standpoint. If a man grabs your breast but you tell the police that he tried to rape you, you are being untruthful. This would be a diservice to woman who are actually raped.
No, I don't know what would have happened next - had he not be "stopped". Nor do you. But I know what the director was telling me from my experience of watching these dramas. Telling you that you should call it what it is - is just that. I am a teacher (and one time Women's Aid Volunteer) and I certainly would never say that Women who can not fight back can not be raped. You make some very good points - and I understand your feelings on the matter but, unfortunately, they did not address the point which I was making.
I mean no disrespect but I have to ask. Do you want her (the character and not the actress) to be gay (because you are, perhaps) or is she (the actress / character) giving off vibes that I have missed? I have only watched three episodes thus far but have seen nothing to suggest that she is batting for the same side, as it were.
1
Delusional means characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgements about external reality that are held despite 'incontrovertible evidence' to the contrary, as a symptom of serious mental illness.
As likes and dislikes are very subjective, how can one provide objective evidence to the contrary? Had you a basic understanding of the word, you would know this.
Surprise, surprise -townspeople appeared twice for a second or two in ep. 12.
Did you mean to write, "IS NOT"? You have it back to front. Your comment would make more sense had you thought that I had said, 'women who CAN fight back can NOT be raped'. Regardless...
Er...No. It does not suggest that at all. I was saying, in response to your comment, that there was nobody else there to pull him off of her. YOUR use of the continuous tense 'TRYING' implies that he failed to complete the action. She did not have the strength to stop him. so, who or what, from your perspective, was physically strong enough to stop him? You say that it was because he was interrupted every time. I shall have to watch it again to verify/disprove your claim but, until then, my comment about him stopping because he chose to (for whatever reason) stands. If he were really meant to rape her, he would have suceeded when the other person(s) (who did nothing, by the way) left him to resume his so called 'TRYI NG'.
Also, I did not give MY point of view - except for the last comment about where I would kick him. As a retired teacher, my comment was mostly addressing your terminology from a linguistic, etymological, and legal standpoint. If a man grabs your breast but you tell the police that he tried to rape you, you are being untruthful. This would be a diservice to woman who are actually raped.
No, I don't know what would have happened next - had he not be "stopped". Nor do you. But I know what the director was telling me from my experience of watching these dramas. Telling you that you should call it what it is - is just that. I am a teacher (and one time Women's Aid Volunteer) and I certainly would never say that Women who can not fight back can not be raped.
You make some very good points - and I understand your feelings on the matter but, unfortunately, they did not address the point which I was making.