This review may contain spoilers
Review: Tastefully Yours (2025) — Disappointment Served on a Silver Platter
I really wanted to love this show. The beginning promised so much: a brilliant female chef (Mo Yeon-joo) with passion, skill, and even that CIA-certificate. The romance was believable, the tension over quality vs. business was interesting. It hooked me.But somewhere late-midway, this drama lost its head. And the ending? It felt like giving a lukewarm apology when a straight up confession and consequence were due.
Here’s where Tastefully Yours failed—big time:
1. Lack of Accountability
Han Beom-woo (the male lead) had plenty of chances to own up. He didn’t just watch things happen: his company’s chefs stole Yeon-joo’s recipes (his mother, Young-hye, and assistant Yoo-jin). Motto got three stars by using her work. And what does he do? It’s vague excuses, soft apologies. He never publicly admits what they’d done, never faces the blowback fully. That weakens the integrity of his “redemption.”
2. The Mother’s Role Whitewashed
The mother is billed as someone who built the company so her kids could eat, so blah blah. Even if that were true (and the show sort of hints it), it doesn’t erase how many people she hurt. She cultivated an environment where cheating, recipe-theft, corporate scheming were allowed. That needed to be exposed, not glossed over. Yet the ending tucks her “change” into a few nice scenes, as if that undoes years of wrongdoing.
3. Yeon-joo’s Hurt Ignored or Minimized
Every betrayal was serious: her recipes stolen, her restaurant burned, her trust smashed. But the story treats her anger as something to move past, rather than something that demands respect and resolution. The hurt doesn’t get its due. Her being the moral center doesn’t excuse how lightly the show treats what she endured.
4. The False “Happy Ending” Illusion
The finale tries to wrap things with a “we’re still family” vibe, forgiveness, reconciliation. But not everyone is okay. The series needed to show real consequences: public shame, industry fallout, personal restitution. Instead, we got vague statements (“the chef quits” etc.). That is not enough. For a story so built on stolen work, this should’ve been a reckoning.
5. Missed Opportunities & Weak Plot Resolutions
The ex-boyfriend storyline (Jeon Min) pops up, teases things, then fades. Could’ve added more weight to Yeon-joo’s past.
The company (Hansang/Motto) should’ve been affected in reputation. The narrative suggests hush hush, but we never got a clear exposure.
Redemption arcs are fine, but they need to be earned. Beom-woo’s growth felt rushed and under-shown.
---
What worked: The food scenes are beautiful. Yeon-joo is a strong protagonist, the acting is good. I wanted to root for them. The core theme—creativity vs corporate greed—is solid.
What didn’t: The ending weakens the story. The lack of public accountability. The minimal recognition of the female lead’s pain. The scripting choices that prioritize romantic reunion over fairness.
---
If you ask me, this could have been one of the best food + ethics + romance dramas. But instead, it settled for “feel-good enough.” And for all the buildup, that feels like a waste.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Review: Sword Rose Rating: 9/10
Sword Rose was genuinely a very good drama. I initially started watching it because of Dilraba, but what kept me was how different this role felt from what we usually see her in. This was a modern setting where she wasn’t framed as “just pretty.” Her character had weight, responsibility, and emotional depth, and she carried it brilliantly.
One of the strongest aspects of the drama was its portrayal of kidnapping victims. It felt disturbingly realistic. The show didn’t romanticize survival or pretend that everything magically becomes okay once victims reunite with their families. Instead, it explored the uncomfortable truth: people move on, trauma lingers, and relationships don’t always return to what they once were. Sometimes, the only option is to keep living through the pain. That honesty made the drama feel grounded and painfully real.
I also appreciated that the story avoided easy, happy resolutions. Life isn’t always neat, and Sword Rose didn’t insult the audience by pretending otherwise.
That said, there was one element that consistently pulled me out of the story: the subtle—but persistent—propaganda. By the end, it became very obvious, but even before then, it was hard to ignore. The police force was portrayed as almost flawless. No dirty cops. No internal failures. No laziness. No administrative incompetence. The only obstacle was a lack of clues.
This felt unrealistic, especially considering how intelligent and calculated the villain was. We’re talking about a criminal mastermind who could plan years ahead, infiltrate industries from the ground up, and run multiple criminal operations. It’s difficult to believe that someone like that wouldn’t think to plant people within the police force or use bribery to gain advance warnings of raids. In other crime dramas—especially Western ones—small oversights, internal corruption, or past mistakes often explain why cases go unresolved. Here, that layer was completely absent, and it came across as intentional rather than organic.
Another thing I noticed was that the writing felt somewhat stiff at times. While Dilraba delivered a strong performance, there were no real “aha” moments where one character suddenly pieces everything together. Every breakthrough came from collective effort. While that’s realistic in theory, it sometimes dulled the dramatic impact.
Still, despite these issues, Sword Rose remains a compelling and well-acted drama with a mature tone and a surprisingly realistic portrayal of trauma and recovery. It’s gripping, thoughtful, and emotionally grounded.
All in all, it’s a solid jammer—and an easy 9/10 for me.
Was this review helpful to you?
