Omiana

The words of LJH have already been confirmed by several journalistic investigations in significant media. But Garosero has been caught on fakes many times already, moreover, several lawsuits for slander and persecution have already been filed and won against them. They have already accused KSH of espionage and of organizing an attempted murder, how people can believe them, being in right mind, I do not understand.

The responsibility of the accuser is to prove his words. Otherwise, as has already happened with Garosero and KSR family, lawsuits for slander are filed. By the way, against commentators on the Internet too. So choose your words carefully. The press conference of KSH is a gesture of goodwill and a presentation of his position, so that people could understand that he denies the accusations. And now, on specific accusations with their pseudo-evidence, a specific analysis has been given. Including the involvement of examinations and legally confirmed facts. Garosero was also promised an examination, but they have not deigned to present it so far. And the family ran to court only after receiving a fake recording, which clearly indicates that they simply had nothing concrete before.

You are confusing something, it is the accusers who must provide evidence.

An accusation without evidence is slander. Its distribution is prosecuted by law. Your assertion that KSR died because of KSH is unfounded. There was no note. She had debts through the roof, in addition to the debt to the agency that was written off. After KSH, she had several boyfriends and a husband. There were more than 20 suicide attempts, all on different dates. So how long can you baselessly accuse just one of her boyfriends, not even the first or the last?

Where did you get such wild accusations? Even KSR family didn't say anything bad about their relationship, and the "shoking recording from the USA" is already a proven fake. Most likely, like all the other accusations of Garocero, who specialize in fakes. Not a single confirmed proof of a relationship before the age of 18 has been presented.
To judge a person without legally confirmed evidence, ignoring the presumption of innocence - shame on you.

"Tons of evidence is out" - this is too vague. And all these tons have long been refuted. Only haters and those who have not read anything except the first news continue to blame KSH.

What evidence exactly? Garocero had already promised several expert examinations, but had not provided a single one. But with the fake they immediately ran to the press conference and to the police. This means they had nothing more substantial, otherwise they would have gone there much earlier.

Because not a single clear and legally confirmed proof of the relationship before 18 has been presented in these months. But the fakes from Garocero have been exposed more than once.

Her father said that they were watching her 24/7 (but how could they not know about her husband then?) and that in January after one of Lee Jin Ho's videos she tried to commit suicide 8 times and they were with her during that time. But it was later revealed that she was in the USA at the time... Plus KSR's ex-boyfriend, who she dated before her husband, said that the family refused to even pay for her medical expenses and her new agency took it on. Moreover, they did not even know that the deposit for the KSR apartment was made by strangers and the father wanted to take this deposit for himself the day (!) after the funeral.

I also don't understand how KSR, with her love for long letters and the number of suicide attempts, did not leave a single suicide note. And here too there are questions for the family - were they really not there or did family prefer to remain silent, since their content does not clash with their current accusations...

At the time of KSR's death, they were still married, although her husband stated in the interview that they had begun annulment proceedings.
No one spoke of his presence at the funeral, especially since KSR's family initially did not believe in this husband's existence. Why no one cares about KSR's accusations of violence from her husband, or the fact that he controlled her networks, is a mystery to me. Apparently, either because the family does not want to get involved with an American citizen, or because he is not rich and famous.

Garosero is generally a predominantly political channel and is obviously used to distract attention from real problems. Not the first time... I remember how back in 2020, dozens of complaints were filed against them, and they ignored the summonses to appear at the police station, and in the end, they got away with it, continuing to throw in scandalous cases from time to time. They were also the ones who bullied Lee Sun Gyun. How the KSR family even thought of turning to those who had already driven artists to suicide is a mystery to me...

The agency showed metadata from the photos that they were taken after KSR came of age. Garosero promised their expertise, but it is still not there. About screenshots from 2016, the expertise admitted that with a 93% probability the correspondence was conducted with NOT KSH. Garosero refused to provide any legal certification of the authenticity of their screenshots, they only gave a video, in which, when slowed down, the difference in the number and length of messages is visually visible. All their "evidence" before - without certified authenticity. Obviously insufficient to go to court. As soon as they received something more significant (an audio recording that turned out to be fake), they immediately rushed to hold a press conference and file a complaint. Open your eyes and try to understand that sometimes people are falsely accused. And it is already obvious that this is exactly about this case.

It is astonishing that people believe such an obviously made fake. If there are already at least three different recordings from the alleged KSR, in each of which "she" says something different, but exactly what the addressee wants to hear, what kind of authenticity can we even talk about?! A blatant fake for the sake of money. And the fact that Garocero came out to a press conference with "proof" of this level proves that they have nothing more substantial and never had. This whole case is a "witch hunt".

Comment for brokendishes. Funny, you wrote a fake and blocked me. The same with all the evidence from the KSR deffenders.

Gold Medalist (company)
Founded 2019; 6 years ago in Seoul, South Korea
(wikipedia)

Real
Release dates June 28, 2017 (South Korean)
Filming began on January 3, 2016, and ended on June 30, 2016, in Paradise City, Yeongjongdo, Incheon.
(also wikipedia)

And yes, I was neutral. Was. Before my comment here was met with insults and distorted data, presented without the slightest criticism.

The statements from the staff (Real’s assistant director Kim Jung Wook and script supervisor Lee Joon Hyun, who oversaw all filming, including the bed scene) was attached to the agency's statement, you can look for it.

"Whistleblower" is a loud name. IMHO, "gossip", "windbag" and "drunken raving" would be more appropriate.

And in general, it’s so strange topic for the funeral of a loved one - discussing her bed scenes...

Once again, there are recorded and certified testimonies from the film crew. On the other hand, there are only anonymous and completely unconfirmed third-hand rumors.

Why is the person who allegedly said something at the funeral not ready to reveal who he is and tell openly what he personally observed or at least heard from? No one come forward to confirm brother Solli's words.

GM as an agency did not exist then, the filming was conducted by another director, not the one who is the brother of KSH. He was brought in only at the editing stage.

Sorry for not being there again, but that thread also disappeared for me ><

Why yesterday? The agency's statement from April 2. Well, it's written that it was already discussed in the contract, that there was consent from both Sulli and the agency. This is a potentially controversial issue, so it simply couldn't be done without written confirmation of consent and awareness.

I can't reply under the comment about Sulli, because apparently the commentator blocked me. It's funny, by the way, I didn't block anyone, but apparently even the possibility of a discussion scares some people.

GM presented evidence from those who took direct part in the filming and have information about how and what happened. Including an example of a preliminary storyboard. Documented data against rumors from some anonymous person who heard something and told Sulli's brother about it at the funeral many years ago. Hmm... and who should we believe?

Gold Medalist's full statement:

"First and foremost, we express our deepest condolences for the late Choi Jin Ri.
The role of Song Yoo Hwa, played by the late Choi Jin Ri, included a bed scene from the scriptwriting stage, which was explicitly stated when casting to ensure that only actors comfortable with nude performances would apply. Just as job postings specify essential qualifications, the role required nude acting, which needed to be disclosed in advance. We believed that discussing such scenes after casting would place an unnecessary burden and pressure on the actor.
The script provided to the late Choi Jin Ri and her agency at the time included the bed scene, and the character description materials contained details about the level of nudity involved. The contract also had specific clauses outlining the extent of nudity required. Both Choi Jin Ri and her agency reviewed these details before confirming her participation.
Nevertheless, we acknowledge that filming bed scenes requires great courage from actors, so the production team ensured thorough preparations in advance. The late Choi Jin Ri was fully aware of the scene beforehand and proceeded with the filming accordingly.
Regarding the claims raised by her older brother:
About the bed scene: The late Choi Jin Ri was aware of the scene and agreed to film it in advance.

About the body double: No actor performed in her place. A ‘standing actor’ was used solely for blocking movements during the preparation stage.

We have attached statements from Real’s assistant director Kim Jung Wook and script supervisor Lee Joon Hyun, who oversaw all filming, including the bed scene. We also reiterate that scriptwriting, storyboarding, and filming fall under the responsibility of the production team, and actor Kim Soo Hyun was not involved in any of these decisions.
As attested by key production staff, both the late Choi Jin Ri and her agency were fully informed about the role of Song Yoo Hwa. Coercing an actor into a bed scene or nude scene on set is unacceptable in any production.
Lastly, we clarify that we never contacted the late Choi Jin Ri’s mother and do not even have her contact information.
We understand that there may be curiosity regarding certain things heard at the funeral. However, bringing up events from six years ago now and presenting them as firsthand experiences on social media is difficult to accept.
We ask for an end to reckless speculation that hurts the many people who devoted their passion and energy to the film Real. Furthermore, unverified claims are being indiscriminately spread in connection with Kim Soo Hyun’s current situation. We earnestly request an end to speculative reports and rumors.
Thank you."

You are simply demonstrating kindergarten level of discussion usual for cyberbullers and haters. A sad sight.

Kunaga Kishi, ou, now it's clear why the title of professor has become completely devalued these days... If you conduct research and make conclussions based on such type of "evidence", it's a shame.

Cherrymotion, you see only you want to see. If there is anything I defend, it is the principle of the presumption of innocence. The trials are ahead, they will show whose evidence is more convincing.