Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: 13 hours ago
  • Gender: Male
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: April 27, 2026
Song of the Bandits korean drama review
Completed
Song of the Bandits
0 people found this review helpful
by Ophanin
11 days ago
9 of 9 episodes seen
Completed
Overall 1.0
Story 1.0
Acting/Cast 6.0
Music 1.0
Rewatch Value 1.0
This review may contain spoilers
I wanted to see this series for Lee Ho-Jung because the two times I've come across her this year, she's played roles that were sacrificed or rather sabotaged by the plot. And here I am again with the same cast as the very (very) good ‘As You Stood by’ (2025), incredible. That Kim Nam-gil, what a man.

Here is a western set against the backdrop of the Japanese occupation of Gando/Jiandao, a historically significant place. Joseon and China were fighting over the region when Korea was annexed by Japan, which encouraged many Korean migrants to settle there. The Chinese saw them as cheap labour, while the Japanese wanted to take control of the region and then Manchuria. In defiance of their own treaty imposed on China, they decreed that the Koreans were under their ‘protection’ and logically sent in their police and then their army to ‘protect’ them. Fascists always lie. The Japanese claimed to be victims, notably of an attack (in Hunchun), and ordered their soldiers to destroy the Korean independence army (led by the anarchist Jwa-jin Kim and the communists of the future DPRK led by Hong Beom-do). And so came the Gando massacre. Twenty-seven days.
Twenty-seven days of killing civilians only, at least 5,000, certainly more, and every horror imaginable. A crime against humanity. In fact, revenge against the armed resistance fighters who had won the battle of Qingshanli a few days earlier. (October 1920, 1500 japanese soldiers defeated)
This is the context chosen by this K-drama.

So... The tone of the series, half comedy, half action, disarms me. I don't understand. All the reviews talk about the chemistry between Seohyun and Hojung. Such a heavy and serious subject, and that's all there is to say about it ? We're missing something somewhere. The context is virtually non-existent, just a backdrop. We're treating the premices of a war crime like this as a playground ? Playing cowboys ? With his guitar and whistling ? Robbing stagecoaches ? Excuse me ? Is that the story they want to tell us ?
In fact, the plot is very basic and unsurprising. The first episode (boring as hell but taking malicious pleasure in showing shocking scenes) gives everything away, we know everything. And the action scenes spice up this utterly uninteresting storyline.

In reality, we should see poor people working themselves to death, resistance movements organising themselves, but here we don't see anyone lacking food or even just working... it's almost like a holiday ! We are shown, of course, a few farmers in their small fields, with their children playing happily. Gando is still a bit like Korea surviving despite everything, isn't it ? But, excuse me, it was a region in the midst of industrialisation. They choose to show us the love of the land, the work of the land. It's not innocent. The Koreans who were sent there, they worked in factories and lived in Japanese colonies.

The series say that what precipitates the events leading to the massacres is the personal vendetta of a Korean enlisted in the Japanese army against his former slave, who has become a bandit. He led the Japanese to the scene to take revenge on one man. It was almost against his will that he provoked the deadly escalation. He just loves law and order. At one time he rebelled because the Japanese did not consider him their equal in the army... That was his problem in life. (episode 7)
This rewriting of history, which relegates the fake Hunchun attack to the background (mentioned in passing in the middle of the last episode) and completely erases the left-wing (anarchist and communist) and Protestant (Shinminhoe) guerrilla movements, as well as the Chinese presence, leaves me speechless.

I know why one made that choice, that rewrite. Out of nationalism, we prefer to see a band of merry bandits who love their country and kill Japanese people, rather than the reality : the Korean resistance on the ground was not led by nationalists, and that will never be said or shown ; we talk about "seditious Joseon". True apoliticals. An apolitical revolution, but still quite far to the right of the spectrum...
The nationalist government, that of the Korean elites, the one that would effortlessly take power in 1945 and imprison some resistance fighters, was in Washington, not in Gando. They were rich people organised around the future dictator of Korea, Syngman Rhee. (A quick look at his Wikipedia page is enough to see what kind of nasty piece of work he was).

This is a tale where those who head to Gando, a land of lawlessness, unite as one to protect the homeland of the Koreans. The story is a prelude to the Gando massacre.
We can try to protect ourselves from criticism by saying that it's a fairy tale, but it bears all the ideological hallmarks of nationalist propaganda and has a name : revisionism.

Ps : I'm not just giving my opinion, I'm adding verified historical facts.
And as a pre-emptive response : no, I am not a fan of North Korea. It is an authoritarian and dangerous regime where people literally disappear. I am simply recalling proven and verifiable events relating to the struggles for independence.
Was this review helpful to you?