Rinchen14

and this is about the general opinion and not your own

everyone is talking about the chemistry between the couple and how emotional the male actors are. I was so happy to see a remake, especially because remakes always have a great surprise in store, but here???
I desperately searched for a connection between the two until the end
This is all so disappointing.
One half was overdramatized and the other was sold off for less than its value.
The island and its significance.
Couldn't they have simply grabbed the set and traveled to a beautiful island? And what about the first glimpse of the sea, covered by a stone wall? Not least the surprise that allows a small glimpse from above of the sea with a black beach. The meaning of the names is as insignificant as the existing beach.
The kitschy jewelry for girls.
The biggest tattoo in the world, so ugly, that black spot in the middle. Why are there two feathers? How about a curved feather that curves into an S and the other curved question mark side has already been painted.
Use your imagination, it's all just acting.
As the actors made clear, the emotions don't just come from words; you have to actually believe what's being said. Not to mention the chemistry between the couples.
It went too fast, so all that was left was the aesthetics of sex. Not the act itself, and not what happened during it.
I thought something from Japan would be thrown in somewhere, but no. Definitely not a remake. Because the most important points have already been trashed and not surpassed.

But hey, that's enough for kids. They hardly have any experience.

If you're only interested in the sex, which is also boring, that's in this series, you can watch it. If you're interested in real feelings, you should watch the first edition.
In this series, no real emotions are expressed, nor are they exaggerated.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

You shouldn't ask others, but rather assess this yourself.

If you're only interested in the sex, which is also boring, that's in this series, you can watch it. If you're interested in real emotion, you should watch the first edition.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

glaub mir vor kurzen hatte ich eine geschichte begonnen zu lesen
die ich letztendlich abgeprochen hab
sakastisch - darin war es klasse mit den waffen einer frau seinen freund zu erpressen. ???
und man must sich nicht einmal dafür entschuldigen, da das scheinbar total ok ist. ???
mal abgesehen das der gegenüber sich die ganze zeit entschuldigt.

also meiner sicht her sind das die fettesten emotionalsten erpessungen die man nicht tun sollte, überhaupt ist lügen, bedrügen, verschleiern und vormundschaft entreisen totaler geistiger quatsch. wer glaubt das das vollkommen ok sei weil er bis jetzt noch nicht damit auf die f... geflogen ist, wird sich umschauen wenn es soweit ist. wer das tut verletzt sich selber und nicht andere.

ich auch nicht wer mag schon selbsüchtige persönlichkeiten

1. - And this very explanation of yours says exactly what I've been saying all along: you only like the actors in these personalities. -

I'm not sure if that is right or not, I never really paid attention, though I do know I don't like roles where the actor (any Fave or not) plays an ass-hole kind of one. I just don't like ass-holes in general, so I can't in shows either. lol
1. XD who likes them but just ignore it and look at the acting
2. - But if you don't like the opposite personality roles of your favorite actors and you don't want to put yourself in that role, you can't make a judgment just so the actor plays your preferred personality role. That doesn't define an actor; an actor can play different personalities. Which, in my opinion, he did well. -

I like different kinds of roles, they don't have to alway play a role I like best, because I like different kinds of roles, it all just depends on a few things at the time of watching to how I will feel about that role of the actor. If that makes any sense.
2. I think I understand, but shouldn't a series distract you rather than convey feelings that have nothing to do with it?
2.a If I made it seem like I didn't think Nat didn't do well or if I said anything like that I didn't mean he didn't do well in that role,
2.a No, you didn't,
2.b I myself just didn't think that role was for him, so I wouldn;t say he did great in that role.
2.b and that's what our conversation is about.
2.c so I wouldn;t say he did great in that role. Though this is all my opinion I know others think he did a great job and I'm not saying they are wrong, but I don't want it to seem like I though he did a bad job, because I don't think he did.
2.c You wrote an ASSESSMENT
in which, instead of representing the general view, you judged that he shouldn't play such roles.
That's not an assessment, but your opinion, which isn't part of a judgment.
An assessment is rational and objective, not a personal point of view.
3. - Just like many people think the worst actor is the best just because he's the most handsome.
??? -

I don't see looks, well I do but not to base their acting on, I look at the acting itself not the looks of someone, Unless it is Dunk , I over look things with him nI know I do, but he has come a long way, so thast says alot... I got off track, sorry. Looks are good to have, but that does not mean you can act, acting is acting.
3. that was just an example/comparison
3.a Though I do know some who don't go by acting but by looks.
3.a That's exactly what I mean, and that's why there are so many irrational decisions.
Just because this personality doesn't appeal to YOU, you can't JUDGE for the general public.
Do you understand?

Well, I see more of your greatest actors here than anything else, and if you want to make a list for yourself, that's totally fine, but there are enough lists for voting.

ich nehm alles genau und exstrem toxisch würde ich das nicht benennen, denn sie hat ihn ja nicht eingespert oder die ganze zeit überwacht und bestimmt was er überhaupt machen darf aber vom auftreten ihres sohnes scheint er weniger der typ der das mit sich machen lässt, aber ja sie hat wie fast jede mutter diesen helikoptersyndrom

Don't you take notes? Somewhere, written or recorded, where you can find the actors' TV series?

Did I express that the way you think or feel is wrong? Sorry, I didn't mean that, not at all.
I just wanted to show the side you're not seeing.
And this very explanation of yours says exactly what I've been saying all along: you only like the actors in these personalities.
But if you don't like the opposite personality roles of your favorite actors and you don't want to put yourself in that role, you can't make a judgment just so the actor plays your preferred personality role. That doesn't define an actor; an actor can play different personalities. Which, in my opinion, he did well.
Just like many people think the worst actor is the best just because he's the most handsome.
???

hast du dir schonmal das intro genau angesehen???
und dem entsprechend haut auch die komunikation zwischen ihr und ihrem altem freund hin
und ganz klar das er den jungen nicht auf diese art sich nähern wollte,
drotz die ständigen erklärungen des jungen an ihm
die mutter hat sich selbst ruiniert, schon als sie, drotz das sie wuste das der angebliche Vater augen für jemand anders hatte, versuchte ohne gnade an ihren angehimmelten ran zu kommen.
das ganze ist ein kreis am anfang der angebliche vater der nur augen für seinen freund hatte, der nur augen für die mutter hatte und deshalb alles für sie tun würde, ja sogar ihr helfen in die clique auf genommen zu werden damit sie besser den man bekommt den sie will,
schau mal genauer hin, bl ist lovestory, die hier nicht existiert und auch kein drama sondern eine dragodie in der die grösten fehldenken vorkommen

weil du da etwas siehst das nicht vorhanden ist da sie nie zuneigung gegenseitig hatten

no i failed i mesn Lee Su Ho from "true beauty"

Lee Su Ho from True Beauty

Lee Su Ho from True Beauty