The commercial for the 24-hour coffee bar "Filling Station" was beautifully designed. The only 20 minutes in the entire series that are elaborate, sophisticated, and quietly considered are the last ones of episode 10 - "Secrets in the Dark." The rest of the series is so lame that I wonder how old the creator of the series is, or what state of mind he's stuck in, if you can even call that thinking.
What does the series have to offer? - Countless drawn-out dialogues in which nothing happens - Good music - Great locations - Elaborate male costumes - The main couple - Many "almost" naked men, two of whom were added extra for those who needed it - Statements and hints are played around with pointless, time-wasting, stupid humor for men - The easiest tasks for the candidates - The US winner when he's with the manager - Totally over-the-top manager, seriously, how many times did I slap my forehead? - Stupid women who are famous??? The last 20 minutes of episode 10 - Secrets in the Dark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgM2uWfd1JM&t=858s
And the goal of the series clearly suggests having a hard-on - bravo, what a waste of time
i remember watching this a couple years ago and just decided to rewatch because i couldn’t remember a lot. but…
glückwunsch, du hast erfahrung gesammelt und diese serie etwas besser verstanden. das es eben kein bldrama ist. hinter den zeilen lesen, "warum ausgerechnet in dich" ist wohl hier der ausschlaggebende punkt. der das verhalten des älteren erklärt.
Loved their acting and plot, just needed a happy ending
wie soll daraus ein happy end endstehen??? hast du denn nicht aufgepasst??? oder musst du die serie einfach sprachlich noch verstehen??? ach du schaust es einfach 10 jahre später nochmal um zu verstehen.
I'm not sure where you think I was saying anything about the actors having to play the same character in here,…
' I'm not sure where you think I was saying anything about the actors having to play the same character in here, but I never said anything like that, I know actors play all kinds of rolls, it's thier job to act, so of coruse they play all kinds, but that does not mean I have to like all thier characters just because I am a fan of said actor, right? '
No, not here, but rather that they should always play the same character type in every series. But that's precisely the point, because, as you already said, you don't like all the character types played by your favorite actor. This suggests that, despite his excellent acting and good roles, he simply isn't your kind of actor. But that's precisely what makes a good actor. Not because they are good at playing one particular character type, but because they can convincingly portray completely opposite roles and still be great at it.
' That could be very well the point of it, I didn't go in to the point of it, I was just talking about the fact in it self that they didn't talk to each other, they just talked to a phone. This was a comedy, so why would people go into alot of depth in a comedy? I myself don't normally, I watch it for the fun and laughs, but that is not always the case in some shows, because I don't find them to be all that funny. Either way I watch them for the comedy, not the depth of what could be in it. '
I don't understand points 2 and 3. I didn't notice any scenes that were abruptly cut off. I think it's good to think critically, but it wasn't necessary here, since the flashbacks explained everything—why the characters acted or spoke the way they did. The real problem in this series, however, is something no one is talking about: having sex with oneself.
If you're the kind of person who expects an actor to always play the same character, then you haven't really understood what an actor is. Nat had to play the role of Sun, precisely because Sun was inhabiting his body.
'This had nothing changing from episode to episode, nether one of them talked to the other, they only talked to the video alone, yea that's really helpful... NOT! There is so much more I can go on with, but I need to move on...'
Have you ever considered that its purpose might be to encourage other people to start communicating in the first place?
I'm the kind of person who shares my perspective, just so the other person has seen all sides of the issue. The basic idea isn't like in "Freaky Friday," where it was all about seeing things from another perspective and recognizing that everyone has their own burdens to bear, hence the added bonus of them standing up for each other. But here, it wasn't about how the other person lives, but rather why they live that way. The back-and-forth exchange was meant to show them that their preconceived notions and mutual judgments were still wrong; this became clearer when they watched the short self-reflection videos. The fact that it wasn't more obvious probably stems from the fact that they were having sex with themselves. Earth Katsamonnat Namwirote's role was that of Nueng's brother. But hey, that's not important. So, is it really worth posting your opinion in a public review, just so everyone can read that the review is rubbish because the reviewer wasn't paying attention? In a private review, you can keep your opinion to yourself. But in a public review, you should ideally know all the relevant aspects.
Brilliant story and a wonderful surprise to see that there are still real actors out there. Finally, someone has recognized what it truly means to be an actor. It's about not always playing the same character type. Wonderful! However, there are some flaws. The sex scenes should have been handled very differently; they are simply too explicit. Just consider the fact that no one pays attention to the age rating and just starts watching anyway, then gets upset because they think the series is bad. For goodness' sake, the 18+ rating isn't just based on sex scenes and violence. Anyone who doesn't understand the series and compares it to "Freaky Friday" is clearly not 18, that's for sure.
The BL Shia community voted and gave Suntiny a score of 4. Do you agree? Do you disagree? Do you want to be part…
Why? Because it doesn't conform to the stereotype that Max should play the dominant role and Nat the submissive one. Good actors are capable of portraying diverse characters, as seen in this series. If those who made this decision think otherwise, it means they believe acting is simply about having a good looks and being a celebrity. Ridiculous.
The only 20 minutes in the entire series that are elaborate, sophisticated, and quietly considered are the last ones of episode 10 - "Secrets in the Dark."
The rest of the series is so lame that I wonder how old the creator of the series is, or what state of mind he's stuck in, if you can even call that thinking.
What does the series have to offer?
- Countless drawn-out dialogues in which nothing happens
- Good music
- Great locations
- Elaborate male costumes
- The main couple
- Many "almost" naked men, two of whom were added extra for those who needed it
- Statements and hints are played around with pointless, time-wasting, stupid humor for men
- The easiest tasks for the candidates
- The US winner when he's with the manager
- Totally over-the-top manager, seriously, how many times did I slap my forehead?
- Stupid women who are famous???
The last 20 minutes of episode 10 - Secrets in the Dark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgM2uWfd1JM&t=858s
And the goal of the series clearly suggests having a hard-on - bravo, what a waste of time
das es eben kein bldrama ist.
hinter den zeilen lesen, "warum ausgerechnet in dich" ist wohl hier der ausschlaggebende punkt. der das verhalten des älteren erklärt.
hast du denn nicht aufgepasst???
oder musst du die serie einfach sprachlich noch verstehen???
ach du schaust es einfach 10 jahre später nochmal um zu verstehen.
The main thing is that they are naked and having sex.
No Cherry Blossoms after Winter, Ai Long Nhai or Life: Love on the Line.
No, not here, but rather that they should always play the same character type in every series. But that's precisely the point, because, as you already said, you don't like all the character types played by your favorite actor.
This suggests that, despite his excellent acting and good roles, he simply isn't your kind of actor.
But that's precisely what makes a good actor. Not because they are good at playing one particular character type, but because they can convincingly portray completely opposite roles and still be great at it.
' That could be very well the point of it, I didn't go in to the point of it, I was just talking about the fact in it self that they didn't talk to each other, they just talked to a phone. This was a comedy, so why would people go into alot of depth in a comedy? I myself don't normally, I watch it for the fun and laughs, but that is not always the case in some shows, because I don't find them to be all that funny. Either way I watch them for the comedy, not the depth of what could be in it. '
as if one could no longer laugh at a comedy then.
2. Consider all perspectives.
3. First, turn 18.
I didn't notice any scenes that were abruptly cut off.
I think it's good to think critically, but it wasn't necessary here, since the flashbacks explained everything—why the characters acted or spoke the way they did.
The real problem in this series, however, is something no one is talking about: having sex with oneself.
'This had nothing changing from episode to episode, nether one of them talked to the other, they only talked to the video alone, yea that's really helpful... NOT! There is so much more I can go on with, but I need to move on...'
Have you ever considered that its purpose might be to encourage other people to start communicating in the first place?
The basic idea isn't like in "Freaky Friday," where it was all about seeing things from another perspective and recognizing that everyone has their own burdens to bear, hence the added bonus of them standing up for each other.
But here, it wasn't about how the other person lives, but rather why they live that way.
The back-and-forth exchange was meant to show them that their preconceived notions and mutual judgments were still wrong; this became clearer when they watched the short self-reflection videos.
The fact that it wasn't more obvious probably stems from the fact that they were having sex with themselves.
Earth Katsamonnat Namwirote's role was that of Nueng's brother. But hey, that's not important. So, is it really worth posting your opinion in a public review, just so everyone can read that the review is rubbish because the reviewer wasn't paying attention? In a private review, you can keep your opinion to yourself. But in a public review, you should ideally know all the relevant aspects.
Finally, someone has recognized what it truly means to be an actor.
It's about not always playing the same character type.
Wonderful!
However, there are some flaws.
The sex scenes should have been handled very differently; they are simply too explicit.
Just consider the fact that no one pays attention to the age rating and just starts watching anyway, then gets upset because they think the series is bad. For goodness' sake, the 18+ rating isn't just based on sex scenes and violence.
Anyone who doesn't understand the series and compares it to "Freaky Friday" is clearly not 18, that's for sure.
Because it doesn't conform to the stereotype that Max should play the dominant role and Nat the submissive one.
Good actors are capable of portraying diverse characters, as seen in this series. If those who made this decision think otherwise, it means they believe acting is simply about having a good looks and being a celebrity.
Ridiculous.