In this case, we should also ban action films, because violence is disgusting, any horror and thriller films,…
I believe that if you demand others to adhere to your high standards in such a passive-aggressive or even outright insulting tone, but do not follow them yourself, then you are simply the most banal hypocrite, whose opinion objectively should not interest anyone. You can ridiculously censor the word porn as much as you want, or insult and accuse of sexual deviance anyone whose taste in porn is even theoretically too radical for you (let me remind you, we still literally know nothing about his taste in porn, he just published the cover of a porn parody on his show), all this will further strengthen your reputation as an offensive and toxic moral guardian.
Which only makes it even more ridiculous for you to try to communicate with me in the mentoring tone of a full of false virtue religious fanatic or write me walls of text, assuming that I actually care THAT much about your opinion after that. Sorry, but I am an adult from a 21st century European country and will never take seriously all these attempts to impose sexual complexes and moral dogmas of the Victorian era on me.
And no, I'm not into rape porn. But I believe that any person has the right to consume any content as long as it is absolutely legal and does not in any way violate the freedom of other people. Even if I have different tastes or some other thoughts about it. Seems like an obvious point, but it seems too many people here are still living in the Middle Ages.
P.S. You asked me why you should care about violating the rights of other social groups if you do not belong to them. So, why should people from other social groups worry about your feelings and experiences then? This is a two-way street.
In this case, we should also ban action films, because violence is disgusting, any horror and thriller films,…
That is, you are literally ready to demonize a person for violent porn and equate rape porn with real rape, but at the same time you consider it completely normal to watch a series about serial murders and, as far as I understand, you understand the difference between fictional murders in fictional media and real murders? Typical double standards and moral inconsistency, when you strictly follow morality in some issues and are unusually liberal in others.
I guess you are a typical person who is not capable of convincingly proving their point of view in a reasonable debate, so you just start getting personal, throwing labels and speculating on the motives of your opponent. Sorry, you are just once again acting like a toxic moral guardian that demeans and insults everyone who questions their moral dogmas. I would say "nothing new", but you are literally attacking and humiliating other people for not meeting standards that we see you are unable to meet yourself.
The fact that the porn was about rape (and not even the fact that he watched it, just shared the illustration, since he starred in the original show) is just an excuse for your hatred of him. So sorry, either you consistently condemn any portrayal of bad things in fictional media, or further discussion is simply pointless due to the fact that I see no point in discussing morality with hypocrites. No one will care about your opinion on morality when you yourself are unable to live up to your standards.
I just can't help but laugh at the fact that this show was watched and appreciated by many who in the next thread tried to demonize the actor because of the cover of a porn parody of his show. Because parody violent porn is evil, but parody serial murders apparently are not, I don’t know how the logic of today’s moral guardians works.
In this case, we should also ban action films, because violence is disgusting, any horror and thriller films,…
Sorry, but women are not the only victims of our far from ideal world. And we're talking about a porn parody of a series that was originally full of violence and cruelty. Why are you watching it in the first place? For example, after just a quick glance, I see how you ended the series with a black comedy about serial murders https://kisskh.at/758379-family-plan. Why does violence only against women concern you? Morality does not tolerate selectivity, either you are consistent, or you are simply hypocritical and simply care only about what interests you personally. This is why all this moral panic and dogmatism is simply ridiculous. You simply are not able to follow the rules that you yourself have set.
Not every person watches porn, or considers it normal.
Sorry, but I will not take a lecture on morality from a man who thinks that provoking a moral panic with endless accusations and derogatory labels is a good argument. You just like to feel morally dominant over other people and thereby stroke your pride. And yes upvoted own comments this is the upside of narcissism, lmao.
Koreans oppas are infamous for having chat groups and many have been caught before sharing and rating women in…
It's funny to hear this from a person whose username and userpic is Dorian Gray. A character who was literally written to criticize toxic attitudes towards women and relationships. But hey, he's handsome, that's why you like him. Damn hypocrites.
Are guys interested in a woman's body? How rude! This is absolutely anti-Christian, God did not give us our bodies so that we would sinfully lust after them! Sex is evil.
You're talking about a porn parody of a show where people die in a royal game in an attempt to make money. What interesting moral accents in people's lives here.
People are saying it's r-porn-- that's gross. I'm not really bothered by the uploading of a porn parody poster,…
In this case, we should also ban action films, because violence is disgusting, any horror and thriller films, and even romantic dramas. After all, when people suffer because of love, it is also disgusting.
Not every person watches porn, or considers it normal.
Most anti-sex activists have sexual complexes. Look, I can also generalize people and throw labels. Amazing, right? Also, do you have an upvote within a minute of leaving a comment? Ahaha, how dirty. And these people are trying to teach me morals.
Please explain to me how you determine the difference between this. It will be very interesting to listen. You just don't use big words to create a moral panic, right?
I swear ppl are freaking dumb. IF and I say IF he watched that adult content, do you think he'd be stupid enough…
The celebrity got into a huge drug scandal - people are justifying it and literally trying to promote drugs as something harmless and unfairly condemned. The celebrity laughed at the porn parody of own show - we literally see the fires of the new Inquisition in the comments. People are not just stupid, they canceled the sexual revolution and returned to the Middle Ages.
yep it’s all the Korean men’s fault bcus the naked japanese women weren’t sexualizing themselves or anything
These people gaslight themselves into believing that any women involved in the porn industry are broken inside and forced into it. This is really the world of religious activists with repressed sexuality.
Which only makes it even more ridiculous for you to try to communicate with me in the mentoring tone of a full of false virtue religious fanatic or write me walls of text, assuming that I actually care THAT much about your opinion after that. Sorry, but I am an adult from a 21st century European country and will never take seriously all these attempts to impose sexual complexes and moral dogmas of the Victorian era on me.
And no, I'm not into rape porn. But I believe that any person has the right to consume any content as long as it is absolutely legal and does not in any way violate the freedom of other people. Even if I have different tastes or some other thoughts about it. Seems like an obvious point, but it seems too many people here are still living in the Middle Ages.
P.S. You asked me why you should care about violating the rights of other social groups if you do not belong to them. So, why should people from other social groups worry about your feelings and experiences then? This is a two-way street.
I guess you are a typical person who is not capable of convincingly proving their point of view in a reasonable debate, so you just start getting personal, throwing labels and speculating on the motives of your opponent. Sorry, you are just once again acting like a toxic moral guardian that demeans and insults everyone who questions their moral dogmas. I would say "nothing new", but you are literally attacking and humiliating other people for not meeting standards that we see you are unable to meet yourself.
The fact that the porn was about rape (and not even the fact that he watched it, just shared the illustration, since he starred in the original show) is just an excuse for your hatred of him. So sorry, either you consistently condemn any portrayal of bad things in fictional media, or further discussion is simply pointless due to the fact that I see no point in discussing morality with hypocrites. No one will care about your opinion on morality when you yourself are unable to live up to your standards.