How about you judge the drama after actually finishing the first ep or so, instead of listing a chaebol scenario,…
I didn't make any assumptions; only referred to what you wrote. You literally made a whole assumption paragraph:
"And then they make tthis rude lead fall in love with the poor lead. And then to prove and achieve this love the richer one also has to lose everything and become a poor person. I just don't like how they drag him down and make him look more pathetic than anyone. Through all of it only one person gets to keep their pride. And not like there aren't good partners for them to live happily amongst the rich. The rich, even the poor, do arranged marriages among their own. I get it that the rude ones must learn to respect others but the thing is humans don't really change that much to go from one extreme to the other."
It not only doesn't make sense considering you watched 1 episode, but is misleading to say x did this and that, when they didn't. Instead you could've wrote for example, "I've seen the first ep, and am not impressed with the writing. I hope this isn't a typical chaebol drama." or something along the lines.
I dropped this at like ep 6 or so a while ago cuz the pacing was all over the place--so glad I picked it back up. The pacing and story improved a ton, and everything started making a lot more sense.
Yoon Gyun Sang does an amazing job portraying Jae Myung! Usually also not a fan of PSH, but she does a great job here (she's still very annoying in the beginning though).
I’d say that this drama should be wrapped up at episode 12 because the main story was over. As for the love…
The lady kidnapped them because she was spiteful of her ex-husband. She mentioned that he would probably be living with two children like them at the time, and so she kidnapped two children she saw. It just so happened to be Mi So and YJ
thank you for the article, it was great~i like reviews that show all the positive and negative things about a…
You're not slow; I think 30 mins is a fair time. People that write reviews in 5-10 minutes either have all their thoughts aligned, or their reviews contain little to no substance.
>A review with only a couple of sentences is not a review. A review is your personal opinion, but it needs to be more than ONLY an opinion. You can't just say that the story was OK and the acting was great; you need to say why you think that way.
I feel like a lot of reviewers don't get this. I think people who write reviews that have no content outside of "I liked xyz", or "I hated pqr" should just post in the comments section. I often just skip super short reviews that look like they were written in 5 minutes. A review should have thought put into them.
That aside, I think good reviews try to maintain an objective standpoint alongside their opinion. Your writing holds a lot more value if you also try to put yourself in others' shoes. I will click helpful even to reviews that I don't agree with if the person supports their opinion well. Needless to say, the same applies vise versa.
As for myself, I think I would partially classify myself as the persuader. I typically write reviews for things I enjoy, hoping others could enjoy them as well. Though occasionally I'll write reviews for things I dislike if I was very passionate in why I disliked it (haven't done this for dramas yet, but lol I did this on MAL).
On the contrary, not every drama needs to have a deep plot. Look at dramas like Waikiki. Sometimes SoL comedy…
I wasn't referring to ratings; I respect your overall opinion that you think it's overrated. I was referring to your line of argument which doesn't make much sense.
>But to give credit to dramas that do have a good plot
I can also cherry pick serious high rated drama for their lack of comedy, but that would make no sense, yeah? Why should other dramas deserve more credit because WWWSK has a lackluster plot, when the highlight execution of WWWSK isn't the plot?
On the contrary, not every drama needs to have a deep plot. Look at dramas like Waikiki. Sometimes SoL comedy…
It's not right to compare dramas of different genres and/or story and say one is better than the other solely due to x when one was never meant to excel in x in the first place.
OK, aside from that ending, how cool would it be to have your own NS3, clean everything in 2 seconds among other things!
Also I've been wondering how he can eat and drink, where does the food go?? And how does he stay underwater with no malfunctions? They must have really super high tech hardware...
"And then they make tthis rude lead fall in love with the poor lead. And then to prove and achieve this love the richer one also has to lose everything and become a poor person. I just don't like how they drag him down and make him look more pathetic than anyone. Through all of it only one person gets to keep their pride.
And not like there aren't good partners for them to live happily amongst the rich. The rich, even the poor, do arranged marriages among their own.
I get it that the rude ones must learn to respect others but the thing is humans don't really change that much to go from one extreme to the other."
It not only doesn't make sense considering you watched 1 episode, but is misleading to say x did this and that, when they didn't. Instead you could've wrote for example, "I've seen the first ep, and am not impressed with the writing. I hope this isn't a typical chaebol drama." or something along the lines.
edit: that was shortlived rip
I don't get these comments acting like they know it all when they haven't even watched an ep of the fking drama.
really looking forward to hundred days' husband!
"I have a request. Please grow your hair soon. Please"
*lowkey wants him to shave head again so we can make the jokes again* jk
Yoon Gyun Sang does an amazing job portraying Jae Myung! Usually also not a fan of PSH, but she does a great job here (she's still very annoying in the beginning though).
>A review with only a couple of sentences is not a review. A review is your personal opinion, but it needs to be more than ONLY an opinion. You can't just say that the story was OK and the acting was great; you need to say why you think that way.
I feel like a lot of reviewers don't get this. I think people who write reviews that have no content outside of "I liked xyz", or "I hated pqr" should just post in the comments section. I often just skip super short reviews that look like they were written in 5 minutes. A review should have thought put into them.
That aside, I think good reviews try to maintain an objective standpoint alongside their opinion. Your writing holds a lot more value if you also try to put yourself in others' shoes. I will click helpful even to reviews that I don't agree with if the person supports their opinion well. Needless to say, the same applies vise versa.
As for myself, I think I would partially classify myself as the persuader. I typically write reviews for things I enjoy, hoping others could enjoy them as well. Though occasionally I'll write reviews for things I dislike if I was very passionate in why I disliked it (haven't done this for dramas yet, but lol I did this on MAL).
>But to give credit to dramas that do have a good plot
I can also cherry pick serious high rated drama for their lack of comedy, but that would make no sense, yeah? Why should other dramas deserve more credit because WWWSK has a lackluster plot, when the highlight execution of WWWSK isn't the plot?
Also I've been wondering how he can eat and drink, where does the food go?? And how does he stay underwater with no malfunctions? They must have really super high tech hardware...