because the majority of bl fans are straight woman that are watching BLs only to fetishize two man together but…
The majority of people are homophobic, but some of these female BL fans have been supportive allies, speaking out against homophobia in the comments. Don't lose hope
indeed, most bl fans have no backbone and don’t care about actual gay people so they decided to support this…
As a BL fan and member of the community, I care about representation. I share your concerns about the homophobia of this drama and assure you that I won't support it
What queerbaiting tactics? Aren't you the one ascribing sexuality to a healthy male friendship? Bromance could…
The "bromance" you're talking about isn't a healthy male friendship, it's a direct result of censorship. An adaptation deliberately removing or downplaying a gay relationship in favor of "friendship" is a practice called queer-baiting
"Bromance" in general is a cheap cop-out that reinforces toxic masculinity by implying that emotional intimacy between men can only be expressed through "friendships"
Producer-nims didn't "save" you from "pedo" story, Deuk Pal/Yi Heon went on "dates" with teen girls in the drama…
I'm as toxic as a bowl of oatmeal, wholesome, nutritious, and delicious. You're trying to make me seem spicy because you can't handle the heat of my truth bombs
this is what happens when people fetishize gay men it's so ridiculous
And you people are hypocrites and homophobic
Your accusation of "fetishization" against gay media and its consumers is a baseless and discriminatory attack. You claim that gay media is a "fetish" or that the people who prefer it are "fetishizers." By the same logic, straight media is a fetish and the people who prefer it are fetishizers fetishizing straightness
"Heterophobia" is something someone made up to feel oppressed. Next you'll accuse the Tooth Fairy of discriminating against incisors smh
Some people in the comments section are hypocrites they want KDP's soul to date CSK but not the girls bcz they…
The producers and their homophobic audience are hypocrites. They censored a gay relationship in the name of age gap concerns and featured Deuk Pal's soul "dating" teen girls
Please fix your comment: "some people in the comments section are hypocrites, they want KDP's soul to date teen girls but not Se Kyung bcz they have age gap"
What have I just read, Book 2 Chapter 137-138, Sekyung had a s*x with SYH (Deukpal Soul), and both parties are…
Producer-nims didn't "save" you from "pedo" story, Deuk Pal/Yi Heon went on "dates" with teen girls in the drama (it's implied)
They shouldn't have been sleepwalking through the selection process. They were the ones who picked a "pedo" story, read it, and decided it was a good idea to adapt it. Don't put producer-nims on a pedestal, they're no saint
Oh, and, can you tell the difference between a high schooler and a pre-pubescent child? "Pedophilia" is adults having inappropriate relationships with pre-pubescent children. Se Kyung isn't a pre-pubescent child. Unless you’re working with an alternative dictionary, there was no "pedophilia" in the novel
I was absolutely on board with bromance and everything, but the last episode is pissing me off. Like it's fine…
"... butbit's fine with 50yr old KDP going on dates with 19yr old girls?? That's not weird or creepy??"
Exactly, the producers weren't concerned about the age gap, but rather with the idea of a gay relationship. If they were concerned about the age gap, they wouldn't have allowed a 47-year-old's soul in a teen body to go on "dates" with teen girls. It'd have been seen as equally creepy and inappropriate
Adapting a novel with a BL theme into a non-BL drama is a significant change, and the people who looked forward to seeing the novel adapted faithfully have the right to be upset about it
"... but I can't understand why people are sooooo dumb on concentrating only on this aspect"
In a review, you should "judge a show on its own merits." Including insults or belittling remarks directed at people with different opinions doesn't add value to your review
you seriously don't see difference between 47 year old in the teen's body and teen girl? okay, lol, and bromance…
@moonchild's comment was sketchy. The poor wording could be interpreted as them claiming that it’s "reasonable" for a 47-year-old in a teen's body to be with a teen girl, and not for the same person to be with a teen boy
No need to get worked up. I was just highlighting the double standard
"Bromance" in general is a cheap cop-out that reinforces toxic masculinity by implying that emotional intimacy between men can only be expressed through "friendships"
Your accusation of "fetishization" against gay media and its consumers is a baseless and discriminatory attack. You claim that gay media is a "fetish" or that the people who prefer it are "fetishizers." By the same logic, straight media is a fetish and the people who prefer it are fetishizers fetishizing straightness
"Heterophobia" is something someone made up to feel oppressed. Next you'll accuse the Tooth Fairy of discriminating against incisors smh
You're being ridiculous
Please fix your comment: "some people in the comments section are hypocrites, they want KDP's soul to date teen girls but not Se Kyung bcz they have age gap"
Yi Heon wasn't bullied because he was a target of opportunity, he was targeted because he was gay. It was bullying and a hate crime
Censorship amounts to ignoring the hate crime that occurred, it's insensitive and disrespectful
They shouldn't have been sleepwalking through the selection process. They were the ones who picked a "pedo" story, read it, and decided it was a good idea to adapt it. Don't put producer-nims on a pedestal, they're no saint
Oh, and, can you tell the difference between a high schooler and a pre-pubescent child? "Pedophilia" is adults having inappropriate relationships with pre-pubescent children. Se Kyung isn't a pre-pubescent child. Unless you’re working with an alternative dictionary, there was no "pedophilia" in the novel
Exactly, the producers weren't concerned about the age gap, but rather with the idea of a gay relationship. If they were concerned about the age gap, they wouldn't have allowed a 47-year-old's soul in a teen body to go on "dates" with teen girls. It'd have been seen as equally creepy and inappropriate
If we keep pushing aside problems that aren't the "worst," we'll be left with a pile of unresolved problems
The change in genre from BL to bromance isn't insignificant, it erases representation of a community that's underrepresented and discriminated against
I'm not sure what satisfaction you get from calling us "dumb" or "sick," and I'm not sticking around to hear it. Have a great day
"... but I can't understand why people are sooooo dumb on concentrating only on this aspect"
In a review, you should "judge a show on its own merits." Including insults or belittling remarks directed at people with different opinions doesn't add value to your review
The issue isn't people preferring to watch non-gay dramas, it's people trying to censor gay works because they don't want to see gay romance
No need to get worked up. I was just highlighting the double standard