This review may contain spoilers
The ending didn't earn my tears.
I finished Kill to Love feeling more angry than devastated, and that honestly surprised me. I didn’t hate the ending because it was tragic. I expected tragedy. What frustrated me was how Shu He got there, and how the show asks us to accept his final choice without really earning it.
Early Shu He is defined by a love of art and music, a clear emotional intelligence, a distance from court politics, and most importantly his ability to truly see Zi Ang as a human being rather than a weapon or a tool. That’s the foundation of their relationship, even if they initially approached each other with their own agendas (which didn’t last long once they fell hard for one another). Shu He’s empathy and moral awareness are not subtle traits since the show emphasizes them again and again.
That’s why his later character shift feels so jarring.
Before the Crown Prince’s rebellion, the series goes out of its way to show that Shu He is not blindly loyal to his brother. He is openly disappointed in the way his brother rules. He sees the corruption, questions his methods, and even directly opposes him at court instead of quietly appeasing him. This matters, because it establishes Shu He as someone capable of moral judgment and resistance, not just a passive bystander ruled by filial piety alone.
And yet, after the rebellion, that entire foundation seems to vanish.
This is the same brother who destroyed Shu He’s hand, stripping him of his music and identity. The same brother who murdered their father and openly stated he would kill Shu He as well. Despite all of this, Shu He never truly reckons with who his brother became. Instead of grappling with the truth - that the Crown Prince was already lost, that power had corrupted him beyond repair - Shu He emotionally freezes and redirects his grief outward. Rather than being conflicted between familial duty and forbidden love, he chooses to idealize his dead family and blame Zi Ang for everything that went wrong.
That’s where the writing loses me.
The show also tells us very clearly that Zi Ang only invades Shu He's kingdom as an absolute last resort. Shu He’s rule is so weak that nobles and citizens are already on the brink of rebellion, and the kingdom falls quickly precisely because the people are discontented. The invasion isn’t the cause of the collapse but the consequence of a kingdom already rotting from within, which makes Shu He’s supposed devotion to his people ring hollow.
Rather than taking agency as a ruler, acknowledging the rot in the court, his own inaction, or asking why his people abandoned him so easily, Shu He becomes fixated on Zi Ang as the singular cause of his suffering. It feels less like tragedy and more like avoidance. Zi Ang becomes a convenient vessel for guilt, allowing Shu He to preserve an image of moral righteousness without confronting the reality that his ideals were not enough to govern.
This ties directly into my biggest issue: the deception at the end.
Shu He doesn’t just choose his kingdom over Zi Ang, he actively takes from Zi Ang the one and only thing he still had: him. By hiding his intention to die, Shu He robs Zi Ang of agency, honesty, and even the chance to grieve properly. The show frames this as a noble sacrifice, an act of justice, or even a final expression of love. But from my perspective, it felt cruel. Love without honesty isn’t devotion, it’s control dressed up as righteousness.
What makes this even harder to accept is how the series consistently portrays Zi Ang’s love as self-sacrificial to a fault. He gives up everything: his identity, his morality, his power, all in service of protecting Shu He. For Shu He to then decide, alone, that his own death is the final “justice” Zi Ang deserves creates a deeply unbalanced dynamic. If this was meant to be tragic love, it crossed into emotional punishment instead, and that left a bitter taste.
I’m aware that the source material might explain or justify Shu He’s mindset more clearly, but the show has to stand on its own. As a viewer, I needed more internal struggle, more accountability, more visible reckoning. Instead, Shu He’s motivations feel reshaped to serve the tragedy rather than emerging naturally from the character the series itself spent episodes building.
In the end, Kill to Love didn’t leave me crying. It instead left me conflicted and disappointed. Not because it broke my heart, but because it asked me to accept that love means deciding, alone, to destroy the person who loves you most “for the greater good.” And I’m not convinced that’s the story it spent twelve episodes telling.
Early Shu He is defined by a love of art and music, a clear emotional intelligence, a distance from court politics, and most importantly his ability to truly see Zi Ang as a human being rather than a weapon or a tool. That’s the foundation of their relationship, even if they initially approached each other with their own agendas (which didn’t last long once they fell hard for one another). Shu He’s empathy and moral awareness are not subtle traits since the show emphasizes them again and again.
That’s why his later character shift feels so jarring.
Before the Crown Prince’s rebellion, the series goes out of its way to show that Shu He is not blindly loyal to his brother. He is openly disappointed in the way his brother rules. He sees the corruption, questions his methods, and even directly opposes him at court instead of quietly appeasing him. This matters, because it establishes Shu He as someone capable of moral judgment and resistance, not just a passive bystander ruled by filial piety alone.
And yet, after the rebellion, that entire foundation seems to vanish.
This is the same brother who destroyed Shu He’s hand, stripping him of his music and identity. The same brother who murdered their father and openly stated he would kill Shu He as well. Despite all of this, Shu He never truly reckons with who his brother became. Instead of grappling with the truth - that the Crown Prince was already lost, that power had corrupted him beyond repair - Shu He emotionally freezes and redirects his grief outward. Rather than being conflicted between familial duty and forbidden love, he chooses to idealize his dead family and blame Zi Ang for everything that went wrong.
That’s where the writing loses me.
The show also tells us very clearly that Zi Ang only invades Shu He's kingdom as an absolute last resort. Shu He’s rule is so weak that nobles and citizens are already on the brink of rebellion, and the kingdom falls quickly precisely because the people are discontented. The invasion isn’t the cause of the collapse but the consequence of a kingdom already rotting from within, which makes Shu He’s supposed devotion to his people ring hollow.
Rather than taking agency as a ruler, acknowledging the rot in the court, his own inaction, or asking why his people abandoned him so easily, Shu He becomes fixated on Zi Ang as the singular cause of his suffering. It feels less like tragedy and more like avoidance. Zi Ang becomes a convenient vessel for guilt, allowing Shu He to preserve an image of moral righteousness without confronting the reality that his ideals were not enough to govern.
This ties directly into my biggest issue: the deception at the end.
Shu He doesn’t just choose his kingdom over Zi Ang, he actively takes from Zi Ang the one and only thing he still had: him. By hiding his intention to die, Shu He robs Zi Ang of agency, honesty, and even the chance to grieve properly. The show frames this as a noble sacrifice, an act of justice, or even a final expression of love. But from my perspective, it felt cruel. Love without honesty isn’t devotion, it’s control dressed up as righteousness.
What makes this even harder to accept is how the series consistently portrays Zi Ang’s love as self-sacrificial to a fault. He gives up everything: his identity, his morality, his power, all in service of protecting Shu He. For Shu He to then decide, alone, that his own death is the final “justice” Zi Ang deserves creates a deeply unbalanced dynamic. If this was meant to be tragic love, it crossed into emotional punishment instead, and that left a bitter taste.
I’m aware that the source material might explain or justify Shu He’s mindset more clearly, but the show has to stand on its own. As a viewer, I needed more internal struggle, more accountability, more visible reckoning. Instead, Shu He’s motivations feel reshaped to serve the tragedy rather than emerging naturally from the character the series itself spent episodes building.
In the end, Kill to Love didn’t leave me crying. It instead left me conflicted and disappointed. Not because it broke my heart, but because it asked me to accept that love means deciding, alone, to destroy the person who loves you most “for the greater good.” And I’m not convinced that’s the story it spent twelve episodes telling.
Was this review helpful to you?
