lana

I was one of those people who spoke positively about this drama after the first episode, but when it got to the zombies, I was disappointed. I understand that it's a comedy, but I didn't expect the characters to be so illogical. This is probably the first time I've given a drama a high rating at first, only to lower it by several points later. That being said, it's not as terrible as that Japanese movie, so I think I'll give it another chance to see how it develops.
And the argument "it's just not your genre" doesn't work here because I absolutely love disaster dramas and enjoy comedy as well. The only thing is that I'm not a big fan of romance, but in this case, I don't mind it at all, so it's actually a plus for me that it doesn't evoke any negative emotions.

I just expressed my opinion on why I didn't like this drama. I'm not saying I'm an expert, and neither are you. For me, the execution is weak. If you like it, I'm happy for you, but you shouldn't call people haters just because they don't like the same thing as you do.

Oh yes. Watched it, not a bad start.

I will not praise a drama just because it is something new. The execution is terrible, that's all

The characters behave very foolishly, it's so annoying. That's why I was afraid of combining zombies with comedy

I came to read the reviews before watching and was shocked by this rating. I've seen dramas where absolutely everything was bad, yet their ratings were still relatively decent. This is the first time I've seen such a low score, and why do I feel like this drama isn't that terrible, but it's actually the work of people deliberately trying to lower the rating? I've noticed this happening very often lately. If that's the case, then the question is—why???

It's not about her being reserved—that's normal—but she lacks the cold charisma that makes such characters interesting. Because of this, it's hard to understand her character and get invested in her story.

I don't know if it's on purpose or not, but the FL evokes zero emotions

yes

Damn, I'm so glad I gave this drama a second chance. I LIKE IT SO MUCH

"Hellbound" shows how easily fear turns people into a ruthless mob. When society seeks an explanation for chaos, it is ready to accept any idea, even if it leads to violence. There is no absolute truth here—only faith, which becomes a weapon in the hands of those who seek power. The scariest part is that reality is not so different from this story.

The first episode of Newtopia set a somewhat unexpected tone for me. Instead of a quick dive into zombie chaos, the story focused more on the military aspect and character relationships. This doesn’t make it bad, it just wasn’t as dynamic as I expected. The characters seem interesting so far, though I haven’t formed a strong attachment to them yet. Overall, the start feels neutral—not boring, but also not giving me the "I need to watch the next episode right away" feeling.

It feels like this drama had just begun, but then—boom, it’s over just like that...

Gemini
https://open.spotify.com/track/52g6GoL4DZxw6m8QGqLrgh?si=q3vZQyvHQPSVjr-Xc8r4AA

🙏🙏

6 episodes are far too few for a story like this

Yes, the drama on Earth is really more intense. It's good that you didn't drop it, this drama is worth watching!!

The comparison between English and russian is incorrect. English is a language of international communication, whereas russian is STILL used as a tool of aggressive politics and cultural imposition. Following this logic, I would have to condemn all countries with a colonial past, which is obviously absurd.
For me, the russian language is associated with war, occupation, and the destruction of my country. That’s why my question about the origin of the interlocutor is also justified—I have no desire to interact with those who tolerate or justify russia. This is an absolutely logical position for someone who witnesses the consequences of russian aggression every day.
Perhaps I should have just ignored that comment and blocked it instead of wasting my nerves, as I usually do. Goodbye, I see no reason to continue this conversation with you 👋

English is an international language used worldwide for science, business, culture, and communication. It is not a language of occupiers for Ukraine because Ukraine has never been under English occupation, and English has never been imposed on us through repression, bans, or coercion.
russian, on the other hand, has an entirely different context. For centuries, Ukrainians were forced to abandon their language through repression, forced Russification, the liquidation of Ukrainian intellectuals, and the physical destruction of the population. The Ukrainian language was repeatedly banned at the official level—such as through the Valuev Circular, the Ems Ukaz, and Soviet Russification policies. All of this was part of an imperial strategy that continues today in the form of war, occupation, and informational influence.
English became a global language not through coercion but due to its universality and widespread use in international fields. It was never used as a tool to destroy Ukrainian identity, whereas russian was deliberately imposed for that purpose.
Comparing English to russian in the Ukrainian context is incorrect. English is a language of international communication, while russian is the language of a state that has used it as a means of assimilation and control. Your comparison is either a misunderstanding of history or a deliberate manipulation.

Because this is an international platform where 90% or even more people communicate in English, so it's logical to use the language most people understand ??