Family has little to do with blood relations, and more to do with whom we choose to bleed for. Myung Joon's heart chose to bleed for Ro Hee and Hee Ae. They are his family. The court should have released him and made him Ro Hee's legal parent
Myung Joon, Sang Yoon, Taek Hyun, Cheol Won, Eun Seon, Hye Eun, Ro Hee and Hee Ae reuniting and sitting down for a family meal would have been a happier ending
I agree with you! Ye Chan was very cringe and no chemistry, the kiss was nothing special! 😬
The kiss was special. Two men met, mingled, and became one. The close-up camera revealed all the subtleties of their lips and eyes. The faint murmurings of their passionate hearts stirred them to action and brought the nascent kiss into being, It was the beginning, middle, and end of an incredible lovemaking. I was left with intoxicating new ideas about what the kiss could do
Do Won (Yul) and Do Jin (Ye Chan) have onscreen chemistry. Do Jin (Ye Chan) is a puppy. His extroverted, giggly innocence complements Do Won (Yul)'s introverted, shy earnestness
Do Hyun won the legal battle, cleared Pil Soo of all charges and changed sides from defense to prosecution. Choon Ho, Jong Goo, Jae Man, Kyo Shik, In Bum and Jenny helped Do Hyun out to clear their conscience. Do Hyun and Pil Soo reconnected. Yoo Ri, Madame Jin and In Bum overcame the loss of their loved ones
Chang Ryul, Shi Kang, the assemblyman, and Chairman Chu, a former shadow ruler of The Blue House and a mastermind of a crime organization, were arrested. Following another investigation led by Do Hyun and Choon Ho, the former president was indicted for criminal conduct
Atsuki (Yoh) and Kouhei (Mizuki) are two beautiful, complementary versions of brokenness
Kouhei (Mizuki) touched Atsuki (Yoh)'s heart long before Atsuki (Yoh) knew what Kouhei (Mizuki)'s hands felt like. Locking eyes and holding each other’s gaze, fearing that someone else will put their relationship at risk, or going above and beyond the average onscreen romp to make love was a sign of requited attraction bubbling beneath the surface
Together, they won't remember what unhappy felt like
"Everyone hates rain. That's obvious. It's damp and uncomfortable"
I love the sound of rain, the smell in the air, and the sight of the wet ground! A rainy day conjures delightful images of curling up in a cozy blanket with a hot beverage, a good BL and a bright rainbow! What's not to love?
Personally I think your comment is insensitive and extremely rude. Whether it's your opinion or not and it is…
Define eugenics. Is it the sterilization of disabled people? Who said to sterilize them? The strategies or decisions aimed at affecting, in a positive manner, the heritage of a community can't be eugenics
Are they eugenics? Then all societies engage in a variety of practices that are widely accepted and eugenic. Women test for disorders and terminate "pregnancies" that are likely to result in disorders or disabilities. Incest and cousin marriages are illegal or culturally frowned upon for transparently eugenic reasons: children are more likely to have disorders or disabilities
There are public health campaigns that discourage "pregnant" women from smoking or drinking alcohol to excess. The decision to use or not use contraception or abortion influences what kinds of people are born, and what kinds of traits they will have. That's eugenic and analogous to selecting among a set of embryos in a way that minimizes the likelihood of disorders or disabilities
Everyone who supports in-vitro testing, or women's right to weigh the knowledge of heredity in the selection of a spouse or child is a eugenicist. Unless you're making the misogynistic claim that the above practices are immoral, everyone endorses eugenics
Disorders or disabilities affect the entire family. Meeting the complex needs of a disabled person puts families under a great deal of stress—emotional, financial, and physical. It's not ableist to not have disabled children. It's ableist and misogynistic to guilt trip disabled women into having children
My arguments are not "Nazi propaganda" in disguise. They are honest, moral attempts to defend the use of the knowledge of heredity to make better decisions about parenthood
I think this is ridiculous. Sexual assault victims get to live and make their life better. There is tons of support…
So-called "murder" does not "end everything for you." There will be no "you" to be harmed or deprived of future experiences
Let's assume it does deprive "you." To what extent does it deprive "you" of the value of future experiences? What makes "life worth living" for one person will not be the same as what makes "life worth living" for another person. Not everyone even agrees that "life is worth living." Have you seen a suicidal person?
The subjective complexities that affect a person's value of future experiences are not consistent with the claim that so-called "murder" is always immoral or harmful
Society speaks of the kinds of future experiences that a person would or will value. It draws a false equivalence between "the value of future experiences" and "the total value of future goods"
To assume so-called "murder" is a harm that deprives "you" of the total value of future goods, we would have to be concerned with the quantitative determination and commensuration of the value of these goods
We would have to accept that the harm of so-called "murder" varies; that the degree of the immorality of so-called "murder" varies with the value of future goods
Imagine a person twice as intelligent as you, with twice the number of meaningful relationships. Their future experiences are more valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow more immoral than lobotomizing you? What about a suicidal person? They don't want to experience a future. Their future experiences are less valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow less immoral than lobotomizing you? Aren't you begging the question?
You have given me no reason to assume that the future is always valuable or that "you" are the type of thing from which it is immoral to take valuable experiences
"... tons of support for them"
That's not true. Sexual assault is a puzzling crime. People are less likely to believe a survivor, and less likely to hold her assailants accountable. The ongoing deficiencies in the processing of sexual assault cases do not allow for support or sensitivity to the range and diversity of trauma responses
"... most eventually get to live a comfortable life in their future"
Again, that's not true. Survivors of sexual assault are more likely than non-survivors to have attempted suicide. Their present and future are taken from them. How is that different from the so-called "murder" that "ends everything for you?" I will tell you the difference. The deceased aren't here to experience the loss. The survivors are. That makes sexual assault worse than so-called "murder"
The survivor of this story didn't "live a comfortable life in the future." She preferred to "end everything." So would I
Invalidating her and my radically different feelings is sad and petty
This drama is criminally underrated. Jun Ho committed to his role as a lawyer and played his parts a little too well. It's his greatest acting performance of all-time!
Kdrama Land is inundated with thousands of dramas. So many that these hidden gems are overshadowed by the excruciatingly unimaginative so-called "romances" and blockbusters
Confession should have been the most-watched drama on streaming platforms. Not *coughs* King The Bland *coughs*
Personally I think your comment is insensitive and extremely rude. Whether it's your opinion or not and it is…
"... a point you didn't get cause you made a retarded comment like this haha"
The R-slur was used in your comment to express what could have been expressed by neutral counterparts. Ableist slurs have two functions; to offend or reinforce negative attitudes towards the disabled
You should "start thinking about what you put online before you post it cause you might ACTUALLY offend someone :)"
"... just cause you are born with a hearing impairment, DOES NOT mean by any means that your child will be born the same way"
"The cause of a child's hearing loss will be one of the following: Genetic – 50% of childhood hearing loss has a genetic component Non-genetic – 25% of cases Unknown – 25% of cases"
The "mother" was hard of hearing. Her daughter was hard of hearing. What are the chances of her daughter passing on her hearing loss to her children? I would say, 50% (one in two). One of the two children will be hard of hearing
"Just cause you are born with a disability does not mean you should not be allowed to have a life, to build something or make something or have children"
The right of children to the minimum standards of health is more important than the so-called "right" of their "parents" to have them. It's not a right to have children
Probaby a thin romance. There’s a couple photoshoot promo before it airs like it will give you already a hint…
"so ... why romance tho? just to catch as many fish as possible maybe?"
Bingo! Mediocre stories run a quick hand over so-called "romance" to maintain an elevated level of popularity. They are incomplete on their own
A complete story is complex in its expression. It should be able to bring forth something extraordinary without so-called "romance." Numbers is not a complete story. Most stories aren't
Gosh, I would hate to think of any love story thought of as being wasted on anyone, regardless of whom makes their…
"Gosh, I would hate to think of any love story thought of as being wasted on anyone, regardless of whom makes their toes tingle"
Preferences exist?
"This won’t work as a BL because of their disparity in status at work"
Subordinate-supervisor power imbalances and inequities were not seen as violations of duty in Coffee Prince, Pasta, She Was Pretty, What's Wrong With Secretary Kim, Radiant Office, Business Proposal, etc. It's common for a supervisor to get busy with their subordinate in "straight" stories. Why shouldn't there be workplace romances or power-imbalanced couples in BLs?
Don't let the commenters get to youA mind free of impediment is capable of grasping the issues with "straight"…
You: this is a short series so there's little time for romance to develop for any of the characters Also you: romance would totally work in this series
*A minor is sexually assaulted by her teacher* Society: I sleep *The rapist meets an untimely end* Society: real shit?
Sexual assault is worse than so-called "murder." The deceased won't remember what happened to them. The sexual assault survivors will. Their wounds are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds
"O, keep me from their worse than [murdering] lust And tumble me into some loathsome pit Where never man’s eye may behold my body Do this, and be a charitable murderer" ― Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
Lavinia begged for an untimely end, saying that it's a fate far better than sexual assault. And I agree. I do not assign a positive value to "life," nor do I believe in a "right to life." I'd rather be so-called "murdered" than sexually assaulted
So-called "murder" lays the mind and body to eternal rest. Sexual assault infects the mind and body. The survivors are haunted by nightmarish melancholia and suicidal ideation
"My life has no meaning anymore"
The sexual assault survivor of this story felt "dead" on the inside. Her past, present and future were taken from her. Her anger justifies what she did. She should have been awarded
4 
1 
Myung Joon, Sang Yoon, Taek Hyun, Cheol Won, Eun Seon, Hye Eun, Ro Hee and Hee Ae reuniting and sitting down for a family meal would have been a happier ending
Do Won (Yul) and Do Jin (Ye Chan) have onscreen chemistry. Do Jin (Ye Chan) is a puppy. His extroverted, giggly innocence complements Do Won (Yul)'s introverted, shy earnestness
Do Hyun won the legal battle, cleared Pil Soo of all charges and changed sides from defense to prosecution. Choon Ho, Jong Goo, Jae Man, Kyo Shik, In Bum and Jenny helped Do Hyun out to clear their conscience. Do Hyun and Pil Soo reconnected. Yoo Ri, Madame Jin and In Bum overcame the loss of their loved ones
Chang Ryul, Shi Kang, the assemblyman, and Chairman Chu, a former shadow ruler of The Blue House and a mastermind of a crime organization, were arrested. Following another investigation led by Do Hyun and Choon Ho, the former president was indicted for criminal conduct
Kouhei (Mizuki) touched Atsuki (Yoh)'s heart long before Atsuki (Yoh) knew what Kouhei (Mizuki)'s hands felt like. Locking eyes and holding each other’s gaze, fearing that someone else will put their relationship at risk, or going above and beyond the average onscreen romp to make love was a sign of requited attraction bubbling beneath the surface
Together, they won't remember what unhappy felt like
"Everyone hates rain. That's obvious. It's damp and uncomfortable"
I love the sound of rain, the smell in the air, and the sight of the wet ground! A rainy day conjures delightful images of curling up in a cozy blanket with a hot beverage, a good BL and a bright rainbow! What's not to love?
Are they eugenics? Then all societies engage in a variety of practices that are widely accepted and eugenic. Women test for disorders and terminate "pregnancies" that are likely to result in disorders or disabilities. Incest and cousin marriages are illegal or culturally frowned upon for transparently eugenic reasons: children are more likely to have disorders or disabilities
There are public health campaigns that discourage "pregnant" women from smoking or drinking alcohol to excess. The decision to use or not use contraception or abortion influences what kinds of people are born, and what kinds of traits they will have. That's eugenic and analogous to selecting among a set of embryos in a way that minimizes the likelihood of disorders or disabilities
Everyone who supports in-vitro testing, or women's right to weigh the knowledge of heredity in the selection of a spouse or child is a eugenicist. Unless you're making the misogynistic claim that the above practices are immoral, everyone endorses eugenics
Disorders or disabilities affect the entire family. Meeting the complex needs of a disabled person puts families under a great deal of stress—emotional, financial, and physical. It's not ableist to not have disabled children. It's ableist and misogynistic to guilt trip disabled women into having children
My arguments are not "Nazi propaganda" in disguise. They are honest, moral attempts to defend the use of the knowledge of heredity to make better decisions about parenthood
Let's assume it does deprive "you." To what extent does it deprive "you" of the value of future experiences? What makes "life worth living" for one person will not be the same as what makes "life worth living" for another person. Not everyone even agrees that "life is worth living." Have you seen a suicidal person?
The subjective complexities that affect a person's value of future experiences are not consistent with the claim that so-called "murder" is always immoral or harmful
Society speaks of the kinds of future experiences that a person would or will value. It draws a false equivalence between "the value of future experiences" and "the total value of future goods"
To assume so-called "murder" is a harm that deprives "you" of the total value of future goods, we would have to be concerned with the quantitative determination and commensuration of the value of these goods
We would have to accept that the harm of so-called "murder" varies; that the degree of the immorality of so-called "murder" varies with the value of future goods
Imagine a person twice as intelligent as you, with twice the number of meaningful relationships. Their future experiences are more valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow more immoral than lobotomizing you? What about a suicidal person? They don't want to experience a future. Their future experiences are less valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow less immoral than lobotomizing you? Aren't you begging the question?
You have given me no reason to assume that the future is always valuable or that "you" are the type of thing from which it is immoral to take valuable experiences
"... tons of support for them"
That's not true. Sexual assault is a puzzling crime. People are less likely to believe a survivor, and less likely to hold her assailants accountable. The ongoing deficiencies in the processing of sexual assault cases do not allow for support or sensitivity to the range and diversity of trauma responses
"... most eventually get to live a comfortable life in their future"
Again, that's not true. Survivors of sexual assault are more likely than non-survivors to have attempted suicide. Their present and future are taken from them. How is that different from the so-called "murder" that "ends everything for you?" I will tell you the difference. The deceased aren't here to experience the loss. The survivors are. That makes sexual assault worse than so-called "murder"
The survivor of this story didn't "live a comfortable life in the future." She preferred to "end everything." So would I
Invalidating her and my radically different feelings is sad and petty
MyAsianTV: https://myasiantv.cx/show/confession-2019
And KissAsian: https://kissasian.pe/info/confession-2019
Enjoy!
Kdrama Land is inundated with thousands of dramas. So many that these hidden gems are overshadowed by the excruciatingly unimaginative so-called "romances" and blockbusters
Confession should have been the most-watched drama on streaming platforms. Not *coughs* King The Bland *coughs*
The R-slur was used in your comment to express what could have been expressed by neutral counterparts. Ableist slurs have two functions; to offend or reinforce negative attitudes towards the disabled
You should "start thinking about what you put online before you post it cause you might ACTUALLY offend someone :)"
"... just cause you are born with a hearing impairment, DOES NOT mean by any means that your child will be born the same way"
"The cause of a child's hearing loss will be one of the following:
Genetic – 50% of childhood hearing loss has a genetic component
Non-genetic – 25% of cases
Unknown – 25% of cases"
Link: https://www.babyhearing.org/genetic-hearing-loss-faq
The "mother" was hard of hearing. Her daughter was hard of hearing. What are the chances of her daughter passing on her hearing loss to her children? I would say, 50% (one in two). One of the two children will be hard of hearing
"Just cause you are born with a disability does not mean you should not be allowed to have a life, to build something or make something or have children"
The right of children to the minimum standards of health is more important than the so-called "right" of their "parents" to have them. It's not a right to have children
And teleportation? He teleported from one location to another. The two men in black couldn't catch him (episode 1, 1:54)
Or is that a sub-ability of chronokinesis?
Keep rolling your eyes, you homophobes might eventually find a brain
Bingo! Mediocre stories run a quick hand over so-called "romance" to maintain an elevated level of popularity. They are incomplete on their own
A complete story is complex in its expression. It should be able to bring forth something extraordinary without so-called "romance." Numbers is not a complete story. Most stories aren't
Preferences exist?
"This won’t work as a BL because of their disparity in status at work"
Subordinate-supervisor power imbalances and inequities were not seen as violations of duty in Coffee Prince, Pasta, She Was Pretty, What's Wrong With Secretary Kim, Radiant Office, Business Proposal, etc. It's common for a supervisor to get busy with their subordinate in "straight" stories. Why shouldn't there be workplace romances or power-imbalanced couples in BLs?
Also you: romance would totally work in this series
*A minor is sexually assaulted by her teacher*
Society: I sleep
*The rapist meets an untimely end*
Society: real shit?
Sexual assault is worse than so-called "murder." The deceased won't remember what happened to them. The sexual assault survivors will. Their wounds are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds
"O, keep me from their worse than [murdering] lust
And tumble me into some loathsome pit
Where never man’s eye may behold my body
Do this, and be a charitable murderer"
― Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
Lavinia begged for an untimely end, saying that it's a fate far better than sexual assault. And I agree. I do not assign a positive value to "life," nor do I believe in a "right to life." I'd rather be so-called "murdered" than sexually assaulted
So-called "murder" lays the mind and body to eternal rest. Sexual assault infects the mind and body. The survivors are haunted by nightmarish melancholia and suicidal ideation
"My life has no meaning anymore"
The sexual assault survivor of this story felt "dead" on the inside. Her past, present and future were taken from her. Her anger justifies what she did. She should have been awarded