I think this is ridiculous. Sexual assault victims get to live and make their life better. There is tons of support…
So-called "murder" does not "end everything for you." There will be no "you" to be harmed or deprived of future experiences
Let's assume it does deprive "you." To what extent does it deprive "you" of the value of future experiences? What makes "life worth living" for one person will not be the same as what makes "life worth living" for another person. Not everyone even agrees that "life is worth living." Have you seen a suicidal person?
The subjective complexities that affect a person's value of future experiences are not consistent with the claim that so-called "murder" is always immoral or harmful
Society speaks of the kinds of future experiences that a person would or will value. It draws a false equivalence between "the value of future experiences" and "the total value of future goods"
To assume so-called "murder" is a harm that deprives "you" of the total value of future goods, we would have to be concerned with the quantitative determination and commensuration of the value of these goods
We would have to accept that the harm of so-called "murder" varies; that the degree of the immorality of so-called "murder" varies with the value of future goods
Imagine a person twice as intelligent as you, with twice the number of meaningful relationships. Their future experiences are more valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow more immoral than lobotomizing you? What about a suicidal person? They don't want to experience a future. Their future experiences are less valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow less immoral than lobotomizing you? Aren't you begging the question?
You have given me no reason to assume that the future is always valuable or that "you" are the type of thing from which it is immoral to take valuable experiences
"... tons of support for them"
That's not true. Sexual assault is a puzzling crime. People are less likely to believe a survivor, and less likely to hold her assailants accountable. The ongoing deficiencies in the processing of sexual assault cases do not allow for support or sensitivity to the range and diversity of trauma responses
"... most eventually get to live a comfortable life in their future"
Again, that's not true. Survivors of sexual assault are more likely than non-survivors to have attempted suicide. Their present and future are taken from them. How is that different from the so-called "murder" that "ends everything for you?" I will tell you the difference. The deceased aren't here to experience the loss. The survivors are. That makes sexual assault worse than so-called "murder"
The survivor of this story didn't "live a comfortable life in the future." She preferred to "end everything." So would I
Invalidating her and my radically different feelings is sad and petty
This drama is criminally underrated. Jun Ho committed to his role as a lawyer and played his parts a little too well. It's his greatest acting performance of all-time!
Kdrama Land is inundated with thousands of dramas. So many that these hidden gems are overshadowed by the excruciatingly unimaginative so-called "romances" and blockbusters
Confession should have been the most-watched drama on streaming platforms. Not *coughs* King The Bland *coughs*
Personally I think your comment is insensitive and extremely rude. Whether it's your opinion or not and it is…
"... a point you didn't get cause you made a retarded comment like this haha"
The R-slur was used in your comment to express what could have been expressed by neutral counterparts. Ableist slurs have two functions; to offend or reinforce negative attitudes towards the disabled
You should "start thinking about what you put online before you post it cause you might ACTUALLY offend someone :)"
"... just cause you are born with a hearing impairment, DOES NOT mean by any means that your child will be born the same way"
"The cause of a child's hearing loss will be one of the following: Genetic – 50% of childhood hearing loss has a genetic component Non-genetic – 25% of cases Unknown – 25% of cases"
The "mother" was hard of hearing. Her daughter was hard of hearing. What are the chances of her daughter passing on her hearing loss to her children? I would say, 50% (one in two). One of the two children will be hard of hearing
"Just cause you are born with a disability does not mean you should not be allowed to have a life, to build something or make something or have children"
The right of children to the minimum standards of health is more important than the so-called "right" of their "parents" to have them. It's not a right to have children
Probaby a thin romance. There’s a couple photoshoot promo before it airs like it will give you already a hint…
"so ... why romance tho? just to catch as many fish as possible maybe?"
Bingo! Mediocre stories run a quick hand over so-called "romance" to maintain an elevated level of popularity. They are incomplete on their own
A complete story is complex in its expression. It should be able to bring forth something extraordinary without so-called "romance." Numbers is not a complete story. Most stories aren't
Gosh, I would hate to think of any love story thought of as being wasted on anyone, regardless of whom makes their…
"Gosh, I would hate to think of any love story thought of as being wasted on anyone, regardless of whom makes their toes tingle"
Preferences exist?
"This won’t work as a BL because of their disparity in status at work"
Subordinate-supervisor power imbalances and inequities were not seen as violations of duty in Coffee Prince, Pasta, She Was Pretty, What's Wrong With Secretary Kim, Radiant Office, Business Proposal, etc. It's common for a supervisor to get busy with their subordinate in "straight" stories. Why shouldn't there be workplace romances or power-imbalanced couples in BLs?
Don't let the commenters get to youA mind free of impediment is capable of grasping the issues with "straight"…
You: this is a short series so there's little time for romance to develop for any of the characters Also you: romance would totally work in this series
*A minor is sexually assaulted by her teacher* Society: I sleep *The rapist meets an untimely end* Society: real shit?
Sexual assault is worse than so-called "murder." The deceased won't remember what happened to them. The sexual assault survivors will. Their wounds are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds
"O, keep me from their worse than [murdering] lust And tumble me into some loathsome pit Where never man’s eye may behold my body Do this, and be a charitable murderer" ― Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
Lavinia begged for an untimely end, saying that it's a fate far better than sexual assault. And I agree. I do not assign a positive value to "life," nor do I believe in a "right to life." I'd rather be so-called "murdered" than sexually assaulted
So-called "murder" lays the mind and body to eternal rest. Sexual assault infects the mind and body. The survivors are haunted by nightmarish melancholia and suicidal ideation
"My life has no meaning anymore"
The sexual assault survivor of this story felt "dead" on the inside. Her past, present and future were taken from her. Her anger justifies what she did. She should have been awarded
"... he insists on pursuing Yul even though Yul clearly told him that he doesn't see him as more than a younger…
He never said he can't love him back. He didn't set a firm boundary that he doesn't want to be involved with him. You're putting words in his mouth
"He'll just move on like all the people with unrequited love"
Noone wants to be rejected. The people who "move on" wish they didn't have to
Rejection is a part of reality. In fiction, it doesn't have to be. We get to transfer our consciousness from the unwritten, unpleasant world of rejection into the written, pleasant world of acceptance where love always wins
Let's assume it does deprive "you." To what extent does it deprive "you" of the value of future experiences? What makes "life worth living" for one person will not be the same as what makes "life worth living" for another person. Not everyone even agrees that "life is worth living." Have you seen a suicidal person?
The subjective complexities that affect a person's value of future experiences are not consistent with the claim that so-called "murder" is always immoral or harmful
Society speaks of the kinds of future experiences that a person would or will value. It draws a false equivalence between "the value of future experiences" and "the total value of future goods"
To assume so-called "murder" is a harm that deprives "you" of the total value of future goods, we would have to be concerned with the quantitative determination and commensuration of the value of these goods
We would have to accept that the harm of so-called "murder" varies; that the degree of the immorality of so-called "murder" varies with the value of future goods
Imagine a person twice as intelligent as you, with twice the number of meaningful relationships. Their future experiences are more valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow more immoral than lobotomizing you? What about a suicidal person? They don't want to experience a future. Their future experiences are less valuable than yours. Is lobotomizing them somehow less immoral than lobotomizing you? Aren't you begging the question?
You have given me no reason to assume that the future is always valuable or that "you" are the type of thing from which it is immoral to take valuable experiences
"... tons of support for them"
That's not true. Sexual assault is a puzzling crime. People are less likely to believe a survivor, and less likely to hold her assailants accountable. The ongoing deficiencies in the processing of sexual assault cases do not allow for support or sensitivity to the range and diversity of trauma responses
"... most eventually get to live a comfortable life in their future"
Again, that's not true. Survivors of sexual assault are more likely than non-survivors to have attempted suicide. Their present and future are taken from them. How is that different from the so-called "murder" that "ends everything for you?" I will tell you the difference. The deceased aren't here to experience the loss. The survivors are. That makes sexual assault worse than so-called "murder"
The survivor of this story didn't "live a comfortable life in the future." She preferred to "end everything." So would I
Invalidating her and my radically different feelings is sad and petty
MyAsianTV: https://myasiantv.cx/show/confession-2019
And KissAsian: https://kissasian.pe/info/confession-2019
Enjoy!
Kdrama Land is inundated with thousands of dramas. So many that these hidden gems are overshadowed by the excruciatingly unimaginative so-called "romances" and blockbusters
Confession should have been the most-watched drama on streaming platforms. Not *coughs* King The Bland *coughs*
The R-slur was used in your comment to express what could have been expressed by neutral counterparts. Ableist slurs have two functions; to offend or reinforce negative attitudes towards the disabled
You should "start thinking about what you put online before you post it cause you might ACTUALLY offend someone :)"
"... just cause you are born with a hearing impairment, DOES NOT mean by any means that your child will be born the same way"
"The cause of a child's hearing loss will be one of the following:
Genetic – 50% of childhood hearing loss has a genetic component
Non-genetic – 25% of cases
Unknown – 25% of cases"
Link: https://www.babyhearing.org/genetic-hearing-loss-faq
The "mother" was hard of hearing. Her daughter was hard of hearing. What are the chances of her daughter passing on her hearing loss to her children? I would say, 50% (one in two). One of the two children will be hard of hearing
"Just cause you are born with a disability does not mean you should not be allowed to have a life, to build something or make something or have children"
The right of children to the minimum standards of health is more important than the so-called "right" of their "parents" to have them. It's not a right to have children
And teleportation? He teleported from one location to another. The two men in black couldn't catch him (episode 1, 1:54)
Or is that a sub-ability of chronokinesis?
Keep rolling your eyes, you homophobes might eventually find a brain
Bingo! Mediocre stories run a quick hand over so-called "romance" to maintain an elevated level of popularity. They are incomplete on their own
A complete story is complex in its expression. It should be able to bring forth something extraordinary without so-called "romance." Numbers is not a complete story. Most stories aren't
Preferences exist?
"This won’t work as a BL because of their disparity in status at work"
Subordinate-supervisor power imbalances and inequities were not seen as violations of duty in Coffee Prince, Pasta, She Was Pretty, What's Wrong With Secretary Kim, Radiant Office, Business Proposal, etc. It's common for a supervisor to get busy with their subordinate in "straight" stories. Why shouldn't there be workplace romances or power-imbalanced couples in BLs?
Also you: romance would totally work in this series
*A minor is sexually assaulted by her teacher*
Society: I sleep
*The rapist meets an untimely end*
Society: real shit?
Sexual assault is worse than so-called "murder." The deceased won't remember what happened to them. The sexual assault survivors will. Their wounds are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds
"O, keep me from their worse than [murdering] lust
And tumble me into some loathsome pit
Where never man’s eye may behold my body
Do this, and be a charitable murderer"
― Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
Lavinia begged for an untimely end, saying that it's a fate far better than sexual assault. And I agree. I do not assign a positive value to "life," nor do I believe in a "right to life." I'd rather be so-called "murdered" than sexually assaulted
So-called "murder" lays the mind and body to eternal rest. Sexual assault infects the mind and body. The survivors are haunted by nightmarish melancholia and suicidal ideation
"My life has no meaning anymore"
The sexual assault survivor of this story felt "dead" on the inside. Her past, present and future were taken from her. Her anger justifies what she did. She should have been awarded
Or kisskh: https://kisskh.co/Drama/Numbers?id=7487&q=true
"He'll just move on like all the people with unrequited love"
Noone wants to be rejected. The people who "move on" wish they didn't have to
Rejection is a part of reality. In fiction, it doesn't have to be. We get to transfer our consciousness from the unwritten, unpleasant world of rejection into the written, pleasant world of acceptance where love always wins