I wish they were defending him on the drunk driving charge too cause I wanted to know what happened with that.
i think they didnt cuz their objective or the message they were trying to convey was how someone's "help" (or overhelping) would cause damage to the person.
Whoa.. from the 3rd episode issue introduction, we can guess how tricky the case is. It's like u can only relate to the story if it happened to you or someone close (or someone who handle the case like doctors or lawyers). The lawyer on the driver's side could try defending by its not hitting him, but on the other side he is one of the variable that the kid end up like that. and then, the kid is from someone rich and the mom is kinda... (saying the stuff like this could be called heartless, but yea..)
Even if he could dodge the sue, he still at fault for "drunk driving". I think we can put the blame on the Irish coffee lol.
Its interesting on how they create a story like this and the 2nd episode. They are playing not on the physical issue which we could give the exact number or answer to who's the wrong, but the psychological issue which a bit harder to guess. Kinda fresh based on the modern problem (?).
i was wondering where the "Esquire" word came from in the ending. i guess they just don't want to be overshadowed by some general word on a search engine.
It really just goes to show how taste is subjective, cause here we have cries of it being boring and meanwhile…
and timing. somehow it kinda click into me cus I was into something like When Life Gives You Tangerines, Melo Movie, Our Unwritten Seoul, and Our Movie on the previous weeks/months. so im kinda craving something calm not over-the-top tension show. i think i might be feel boring like the others if im looking for something fun or thrilling on this.
As far as I understand it the building owner hasn't paid for the construction costs and is claiming they didn't…
ah.. i see. then why the construction guy avoids mun jeong when he was the one who sue the owner? and then came after the inspection ends brought the final blueprints and the papers. its like he was trying to sabotage himself and give much unnecessary works for her.
i just believe Esquire is a better title, and they could add Beyond the Bar on the subtitle on both title.
but, it doesnt really matter anyway, since it just a show title.
The lawyer on the driver's side could try defending by its not hitting him, but on the other side he is one of the variable that the kid end up like that. and then, the kid is from someone rich and the mom is kinda... (saying the stuff like this could be called heartless, but yea..)
Even if he could dodge the sue, he still at fault for "drunk driving". I think we can put the blame on the Irish coffee lol.
Its interesting on how they create a story like this and the 2nd episode. They are playing not on the physical issue which we could give the exact number or answer to who's the wrong, but the psychological issue which a bit harder to guess. Kinda fresh based on the modern problem (?).
i thought this would be longer. Half of the show isn't really half of the story imo.
i think i might be feel boring like the others if im looking for something fun or thrilling on this.
found that on asianwiki
2. at episode 7
3. no,
4. pretty much yes
then why the construction guy avoids mun jeong when he was the one who sue the owner? and then came after the inspection ends brought the final blueprints and the papers. its like he was trying to sabotage himself and give much unnecessary works for her.