Maybe I missed those comments but I saw people saying non is still a victim but he is not innocent,he has his…
Like i said you noticed the pattern but have yet to say how it showed in my replies. Were any of the other kids groomed? yes, tee and i've mentioned that in my other replies but MY post was directed towards Non and every other person who commented their opinion on my stuffed mentioned Non and no other child. So to say "Would your comment be made if it was another character" is still irrelevant to my post. To put it simply. My post and comments were about Non. NO one mentioned the other kids until it was time to make him out to be a bad person or to throw some sort of dirt on him ( Him "cheating" on Phee and him wanting to hurt the others the way he was hurt.) If my post is talking about people calling him a cheater for being groomed, why come to my replies and mention things outside of that.
Also not handling having a different view and calling people out for having double standards is way different. (which is what i did in my post.) Bl girls will watch a girl get groomed by a man and go on a rant on how the teacher should be punished for what they did and vice versa when a female teacher is hitting a male students. But when it is two males or two females, that is when it becomes acceptable or cheating. It is a weird take that has been going on consistently within that group.
I would like you and any other person to pinpoint when and where i said that Non was the perfect victim.
Maybe I missed those comments but I saw people saying non is still a victim but he is not innocent,he has his…
1. Like i said, you noticed a pattern and my original post, do not collide at all, so that is irrelevant to me and my past comments. 2. People understanding Phee's POV (i myself understand why Phee would feel betrayed by what happened between Non and the tutor) has nothing to do with whole heartedly calling a child that was raped, a cheater. Call it what it was, which is manipulation. 3. By calling the situation i was discussing (which is an adult having sexual intercouse with a child) cheating, is oh so clearly dismissing the fact that keng is a predator. Instead of calling that out, people watch those scenes and the first thing they say is, "Non is a cheater."
Bottom line, do not beg and plead with writers to give you a different plot other than school boys and guitar singers, then act dense when they provide that on a silver platter. If you know you cannot handle shows that will not give you glitter and rainbows, watch something else.
Maybe I missed those comments but I saw people saying non is still a victim but he is not innocent,he has his…
My original comment would have been made no matter who it was. I am not sure how you got that vibe from the comments i personally made so i do not understand why that part was included in your response for me.
Also it's not a "so what if people view him a cheater" when stans are always asking for more mature shows when they have the lens of a child. What phee thinks of his boyfriend has nothing to do with my post or my responses to people under it. i am directly talking about real life people viewing what was clearly grooming of a child; cheating, when they know very well had non been a girl and a male teacher, we would be having a very different conversation.
I dont think anyone thought that non is in the wrong for what happened between him and keng.he…
The question was are you purposefully acting dense to push your agenda that Non a BaD PeRsOn? i've given you multiple examples from the show on his actions literally have an effect (you know cause and effect the thing they taught in schools), but it's like talking to a wall with you.
I dont think anyone thought that non is in the wrong for what happened between him and keng.he…
And honestly honey it seems that you did not read my post because no where did i mention the cabin, i directly addressed the people coming for what happened between him and keng.
I dont think anyone thought that non is in the wrong for what happened between him and keng.he…
He planned to kill people who killed him, financially, emotionally and socially?(in no way shape or form am i condoning murder or premeditated murder). I would not say he is a bad person, but i would say he is an emotionally unstable CHILD who looked for help from people who let him down. There were plenty of people who could have prevented Non getting to that point (teachers, parents, actual friends, family), reducing him to a "bad person" is not only childish but shows that you and others did not understand the manipulation that took place within the story.
Maybe I missed those comments but I saw people saying non is still a victim but he is not innocent,he has his…
That's not my point, my point is people calling him a cheater and worthless, are people who do not pay attention and only watch for smex scenes. It was very clear that he(Non) was in a very vulnerable place and the tutor took advantage of that and slept with Non. Instead of calling the teacher out and pinpointing the obvious, they'd rather blame a child for something an adult should know not to do.
Yes I think they’re 16. But age of consent does not mean with everyone. I do not know thai law but in my country…
Let me put this into a sentence that people like you can understand. Non knew what the teacher's intentions (aim, purpose) was with helping him. In return for the money he wanted to have s3x with Non. Non is not stupid and did what he had to, to make sure his family did not die due to a mistake he made trusting a "friend." Bottom line money, fame, or whatever the reason, the teacher is foul for using a child's misfortune to his gain. Now find something else to do <3
Yes I think they’re 16. But age of consent does not mean with everyone. I do not know thai law but in my country…
Without applying any laws, non was a child that was taken advantage of by a grown adult who in fact was a teacher/tutor, he was the only person in the situation that was wrong. Plain and simple.
People who feel that non is in the wrong for what happened between him and keng, are truly disgusting and would not feel the same had non been a teen girl. That boy was CLEARLY groomed and people have the nerve to call him a cheater, just say you did not clearly grasp what happened and go on with your life.
To put it simply. My post and comments were about Non. NO one mentioned the other kids until it was time to make him out to be a bad person or to throw some sort of dirt on him ( Him "cheating" on Phee and him wanting to hurt the others the way he was hurt.) If my post is talking about people calling him a cheater for being groomed, why come to my replies and mention things outside of that.
Also not handling having a different view and calling people out for having double standards is way different. (which is what i did in my post.) Bl girls will watch a girl get groomed by a man and go on a rant on how the teacher should be punished for what they did and vice versa when a female teacher is hitting a male students. But when it is two males or two females, that is when it becomes acceptable or cheating. It is a weird take that has been going on consistently within that group.
I would like you and any other person to pinpoint when and where i said that Non was the perfect victim.
2. People understanding Phee's POV (i myself understand why Phee would feel betrayed by what happened between Non and the tutor) has nothing to do with whole heartedly calling a child that was raped, a cheater. Call it what it was, which is manipulation.
3. By calling the situation i was discussing (which is an adult having sexual intercouse with a child) cheating, is oh so clearly dismissing the fact that keng is a predator. Instead of calling that out, people watch those scenes and the first thing they say is, "Non is a cheater."
Bottom line, do not beg and plead with writers to give you a different plot other than school boys and guitar singers, then act dense when they provide that on a silver platter. If you know you cannot handle shows that will not give you glitter and rainbows, watch something else.
Also it's not a "so what if people view him a cheater" when stans are always asking for more mature shows when they have the lens of a child. What phee thinks of his boyfriend has nothing to do with my post or my responses to people under it. i am directly talking about real life people viewing what was clearly grooming of a child; cheating, when they know very well had non been a girl and a male teacher, we would be having a very different conversation.