This story is a mess of inconsistent insufferable characters.The Chairman, Chairman's biological son, The cop…
I think exactly the same! I wouldn't be on Ji Yeon's side if it was HER decision not to pay taxes. But it was her father's instruction. The ONLY person in her life who was ALWAYS on her side and ALWAYS thought about her interests. She had no reason not to trust him, especially when her husband treats her like furniture. And yes, her father was right - money will not betray. She may be spoiled and immature, but she is not evil. She is just a lonely woman who no one takes seriously. not even her own son.
And to be honest, I'm not sure that it's for the best. He'll be better off without this family.
They definitely need to break up. Gang Ju needs to learn to love and value HIMSELF first and foremost. With the toxic Da Rim family and his stepfather around, he will never be able to do that.
I am at episode 31 now. Finally, Gang Ju gets the long-awaited respect from the Iron Family, especially from Bong…
I'm not sure that Gang Ju got respect. There is no respect there, only guilt. They are now uncomfortable being around him, that's all. And Gang Ju didn’t just choose Da Rim’s family instead of his mother, he left her ALONE, and he knows very well that she has no one. Even if she kicked him out, he should have stood by the house and protected her, and not had fun at the opening.
Honestly, I don't think that the decision to bury the money again was the right one. The police have no evidence that the thieves stole 10 million. Yes, this whole situation is very suspicious, but now it's even worse. With the money in the hands of the police, it is now obvious that some of the money is new, which means someone added it. In addition, Gang Ju’s mother is now being hunted and this could end badly. And all because Da Rim's family should have remained as innocent as possible. P.S. I am shocked by Mu Rim. I don't really like his mother-in-law's behavior, but demanding an apology to his "innocent" mother is too much. And he knows very well how "innocent" she is.
she spent 800000 $ and said the chairman gave her . also the money in the hospital for grandma surgery was paid…
By the way, it was confirmed that Bong Hui paid for the surgery in cash. 800 thousand in cash is very suspicious. If she says that the chairman gave it to her, then he will become the main suspect, since he could have colluded with the bandits to take the money for himself. Ji Yeon is his ex-wife and they lived together at the time.
she spent 800000 $ and said the chairman gave her . also the money in the hospital for grandma surgery was paid…
but the chairman did not give her any money. Even if she tells the tax office about the chairman, he will have to somehow confirm that it was he who gave them. This is the problem with using huge sums, it is very difficult to "find" a legal source.
If this is not stolen money, then Bong Hui will have to prove its origin. She has already spent millions. The tax office may have questions for her, not Ji Yeon.
Well, your reasoning is so poor. The ML mother is also not so innocent. She evaded the tax. That's not a lawful…
Explain to me why they decided that the bandit was firstly the owner of the money, and secondly, he was the ONLY owner of the money? The fact that they saw the ONLY person who buried the money doesn't mean anything. They were very lucky that the bandits here are harmless. In real life, they would have been identified earlier and they could have killed the whole family to get the money back. And I repeat, this could have been money stolen from a person who was also saving up for surgery. And now they couldn't return anything to him because they spent it all. So the health of their family at the cost of the health of another person. Excellent logic. Let's all steal money if we really need to. After all, we always need it more than others.
Well, your reasoning is so poor. The ML mother is also not so innocent. She evaded the tax. That's not a lawful…
So what if he died? That doesn't make the money legal or mean he's the only owner. It's because I'm not rich that I find it hard to understand their justification. Even if I found the money on the street, I'd take it to the police. Because it could have been lost by someone poor, not rich. You can't lose something that doesn't belong to you and I won't make money off of other people's misfortune.
Well, your reasoning is so poor. The ML mother is also not so innocent. She evaded the tax. That's not a lawful…
Excuse me, what? Grandparents SAW a man bury money and stole it. Not just found something lying around. And it's an amazing naivety not to realize that most likely this is ILLEGAL money and that it may have ANOTHER owner. All these pretentious arguments are possible only because we know the source of this money. But what if this money was stolen from poor people who were also saving for surgeries, children's education, and so on? It was just convenient for them to spend what they did not earn. If my child needed such a surgery, then I would probably take the money too. But then I would save every penny to get this money back. Sorry, but I don't think dirty money can bring happiness.
His mother cares only about her money, she doesn't care about her son. She's so shallow, she'll forget it soon.
Yes, she paid for her son's education so that his stepfather would stop humiliating her son. This was right after the divorce. Of course, sarcasm. She is not a perfect mother, but money is certainly not the only thing she thinks about.
And all because Da Rim's family should have remained as innocent as possible.
P.S. I am shocked by Mu Rim. I don't really like his mother-in-law's behavior, but demanding an apology to his "innocent" mother is too much. And he knows very well how "innocent" she is.
And I repeat, this could have been money stolen from a person who was also saving up for surgery. And now they couldn't return anything to him because they spent it all. So the health of their family at the cost of the health of another person. Excellent logic. Let's all steal money if we really need to. After all, we always need it more than others.
All these pretentious arguments are possible only because we know the source of this money. But what if this money was stolen from poor people who were also saving for surgeries, children's education, and so on? It was just convenient for them to spend what they did not earn.
If my child needed such a surgery, then I would probably take the money too. But then I would save every penny to get this money back. Sorry, but I don't think dirty money can bring happiness.