If my student brought me such a review of a series after watching only four episodes, I would definitely give…
It’s funny that you perceive my review as a polite insult, but you don’t perceive your own as such. I’m curious — could you voice the review you wrote while looking the director, screenwriter, and actors of this series in the eye? P.S. The teacher’s task is to stimulate the student/pupil to develop self‑development skills (to foster the ability to learn).
Ok and thx Bot? Tis the exact comment left word for word on a comment of mine in the dramas general forum. And…
It’s funny that you perceive my review as a polite insult, but you don’t perceive your own as such. I’m curious — could you voice the review you wrote while looking the director, screenwriter, and actors of this series in the eye? P.S. The teacher’s task is to stimulate the student/pupil to develop self‑development skills (to foster the ability to learn).
If my student brought me such a review of a series after watching only four episodes, I would definitely give them a low grade. Meanwhile, my colleague said he wouldn’t accept this review for credit. And, forgive me for the comparison, if I were to view this review as a soup I ordered at a restaurant, it would actually be just water. Despite the fact that I see a large amount of text, it lacks any meaningful content — it’s nothing but clichés. Like a soup in which all the other ingredients were forgotten.
Although I do respect commentators and their opinions, on this site 8,447 people are following the series, yet only three people agreed with this review — which is only 0.035%, essentially a statistical error.
P.S. In any case, thank you for sharing your opinion, and I wish you pleasant Saturday and Sunday evenings.
I gave it 4 eps which is two more than what wifey gave it. Even if you allow leeway for the *Kdrama logic*, its…
If my student brought me such a review of a series after watching only four episodes, I would definitely give them a low grade. Meanwhile, my colleague said he wouldn’t accept this review for credit. And, forgive me for the comparison, if I were to view this review as a soup I ordered at a restaurant, it would actually be just water. Despite the fact that I see a large amount of text, it lacks any meaningful content — it’s nothing but clichés. Like a soup in which all the other ingredients were forgotten.
Although I do respect commentators and their opinions, on this site 8,447 people are following the series, yet only three people agreed with this review — which is only 0.035%, essentially a statistical error.
P.S. In any case, thank you for sharing your opinion, and I wish you pleasant Saturday and Sunday evenings.
No. He is heterosexual. And he sees that his friend is showing an inappropriate interest in him. So he makes a hasty confession to the girl to clearly state his preferences.
To be understood, you should at least explain in more detail what exactly in the film makes you uncomfortable.…
No, I can’t. Even though you understood my point of view, I didn’t understand yours. That’s why I’m wondering why, where I see Bona’s professional play, others don’t see it.
When she looks at him in the past, she sees him as a man, not a friend, and her thoughts become sexualized. And…
Of course not. Quite the opposite. Ha-na is currently about 30 years old, and she loves Woo-jae. When she goes back in time, she doesn’t stop loving him, does she? But at that point, Woo-jae is 19 according to the Korean age system. If we calculate his age using the European system, he’s around 18. He’s a minor. When she interacts with him in the past — looks at him, touches him, and so on — her thoughts about him are no longer innocent; they take on a sexual undertone. She feels awkward. That’s why there are all these awkward scenes filmed in a way that makes some viewers sense a BL subtext in the series
When she looks at him in the past, she sees him as a man, not a friend, and her thoughts become sexualized. And…
When she goes back in time, she sees a man, but this man is 19 years old according to the Korean system of age calculation; according to the European system, he may be even younger. At that time, he is a minor.
It is so cringe but for Seo Ham I am willing to suffer, going so far as watch a Bo Na drama.
To be understood, you should at least explain in more detail what exactly in the film makes you uncomfortable. And why you tolerate it specifically because of Park Seoham, and what’s wrong with Bona.
It's always the same problem with body swap dramas (or cross-dressing ones by the way), you have to be able to…
Perhaps you find it difficult not because you can’t turn off your logic (you absolutely shouldn’t), but because you need to literally “turn on” your emotions and empathy. The film is about love and friendship. And in love and friendship, emotions take center stage.
An actress that can’t act acting the role of an actress that can’t act
I completely disagree with you. Bona is an excellent actress. She is a versatile actress, and her emotional portrayal of her characters is precise, natural, and confident. Moreover, this applies to her previous works as well.
It doesn't make sense that Ha na (in her brother's body) is shy around Woo Jae. I mean, they spend years together…
When she looks at him in the past, she sees him as a man, not a friend, and her thoughts become sexualized. And it is precisely this that leads to emotional situations, when watching which some viewers experience “BL chaos” in their heads.
it's weird how they make this stupid cliche about switching back bodies, so now brother see her naked and she…
That’s right, I completely agree with you. All the bad thoughts are in people’s heads. P. S. You know what’s the funniest thing about this? People who claim that this is “sinful” literally tell me and you how “sinful” their own thoughts are. You see, they literally tell those around them: “When I look at my naked relatives (or touch them) my thoughts become sinful (and may even become sexualized).”
So... he protects her behind a door that can't be locked then dies heroically. What's the next step, the killer…
Yes, you’re right, I’ve thought about it. The moment of the attack is shown in slow motion. And there’s one nuance: before closing her in the room, we see the characters looking at each other “eye to eye.” On the monitor screen, first one character looks at us, then another character looks at us. We’re shown sequential actions, but in reality, these looks happen in a single moment. That’s why it seems to us that he has plenty of time to close the door with her, but in fact, that’s not the case.
After he locks her in the room. He is stabbed in the back. He turns to face the attacker. He blocks the second stab with a knife. But she tries to open the door and get out. In fact, the woman is only making things harder for him. He blocks the door handle so she can’t leave the room. He is stabbed a second time with a knife. She continues trying to get out of the room. He doesn’t have much strength left. He spends all his remaining strength to prevent her from opening the door and practically doesn’t resist the attacker. He is wounded for the third time... And, yes, if the other guards hadn’t arrived, the woman could have died. The screenwriter needed to show that his devotion to her is unconditional, that he doesn’t even think about choosing between her life and his own. This is how empaths love and show devotion to their partners.
Yeah, some commenters here are engaged in an unspoken competition in the following categories: 1) who gets the…
I agree with you that it’s unpleasant to interact with such people. Look what’s happened: even positive (from all points of view) movie characters are hated for no reason. Moreover, this hatred is transferred to the actors, literally subjecting them to harassment. People have stopped distinguishing between “criticism” and “insults.” However, if people who are able to defend their point of view without resorting to insults and hatred leave such websites, the trend of “slinging mud at each other” may become firmly entrenched. P.S. I propose creating another honorary category on the website for “missionaries of good.”
Although I do respect commentators and their opinions, on this site 8,447 people are following the series, yet only three people agreed with this review — which is only 0.035%, essentially a statistical error.
P.S. In any case, thank you for sharing your opinion, and I wish you pleasant Saturday and Sunday evenings.
Although I do respect commentators and their opinions, on this site 8,447 people are following the series, yet only three people agreed with this review — which is only 0.035%, essentially a statistical error.
P.S. In any case, thank you for sharing your opinion, and I wish you pleasant Saturday and Sunday evenings.
After he locks her in the room. He is stabbed in the back. He turns to face the attacker. He blocks the second stab with a knife. But she tries to open the door and get out. In fact, the woman is only making things harder for him. He blocks the door handle so she can’t leave the room. He is stabbed a second time with a knife. She continues trying to get out of the room. He doesn’t have much strength left. He spends all his remaining strength to prevent her from opening the door and practically doesn’t resist the attacker. He is wounded for the third time... And, yes, if the other guards hadn’t arrived, the woman could have died. The screenwriter needed to show that his devotion to her is unconditional, that he doesn’t even think about choosing between her life and his own. This is how empaths love and show devotion to their partners.