When the Wrong People Escape Accountability
To generate angst, the writers keep the female lead on friendly terms with the love rival long past the point of credibility. This is a man who displays the same possessive, suffocating love that FL once found intolerable in the male lead and cited as a primary reason for their breakup, while openly abusing his professional position to wage a personal vendetta against ML out of unresolved feelings for FL. She should recognize all of this both professionally, as an astute producer attuned to relationship dynamics, and personally, as someone whose childhood trauma from her parents’ abusive marriage supposedly left her with a “marriage phobia.” Yet with barely any pushback, she allows the love rival to undermine ML, toward whom she still harbors deep feelings, while repeatedly imposing himself into her romantic orbit. Despite being completely tone deaf regarding the main couple, he is still allowed to shine in frustratingly contrived ways, dispensing piercing relationship insights to couples he barely knows. More damningly, he confesses his feelings to ML as a calculated provocation before FL ever hears them, ensuring he can never be held accountable for the interference he deliberately caused.
The drama’s contrivances occasionally tip into the unintentionally comic. ML delivers news of what he believes is FL’s father’s death at a hot pot restaurant, awkwardly prefacing it with a resort announcement as though death notifications require a warm up act. When emotional destabilization alone proves insufficient, ML is also manipulated into complicity, his integrity turned against him by the very scheme he refused to join. The following episode descends into farce, collapsing under the weight of its own contrivances. Yet the absurdity is clearly purposeful. The writers pile trauma upon trauma until FL is sufficiently destabilized for the love rival to make his calculated, self serving move.
What makes this worse is how the drama handles the love rival's exit. Instead of giving him a genuine reckoning, the writers frame his retreat as noble when it is really a strategic repositioning, recasting himself as the selfless guardian of her happiness. He is, in short, a deeply manipulative, hypocritical man the drama mistakes for a romantic, disguising obsession as friendship and possessiveness as protection. The hypocrisy becomes almost comical when he warns off the female love rival (who predictably receives the villain arc) for suspecting the same interference he openly admitted to himself. FL’s wilful blindness toward the love rival is most starkly revealed when she entrusts a comatose ML to his sole care the day after hearing him declare how much he hated him, while placating the only character whose alarm at the prospect was entirely rational. Rather than prioritizing character logic or accountability, the drama bends itself around a wish fulfillment fantasy in which male love rivals are redeemed through the intensity of their feelings, however much damage those feelings caused. Obsession and naivety go unaccounted for, leaving the central romance diminished by interference the drama excuses rather than examines.
The drama’s contrivances occasionally tip into the unintentionally comic. ML delivers news of what he believes is FL’s father’s death at a hot pot restaurant, awkwardly prefacing it with a resort announcement as though death notifications require a warm up act. When emotional destabilization alone proves insufficient, ML is also manipulated into complicity, his integrity turned against him by the very scheme he refused to join. The following episode descends into farce, collapsing under the weight of its own contrivances. Yet the absurdity is clearly purposeful. The writers pile trauma upon trauma until FL is sufficiently destabilized for the love rival to make his calculated, self serving move.
What makes this worse is how the drama handles the love rival's exit. Instead of giving him a genuine reckoning, the writers frame his retreat as noble when it is really a strategic repositioning, recasting himself as the selfless guardian of her happiness. He is, in short, a deeply manipulative, hypocritical man the drama mistakes for a romantic, disguising obsession as friendship and possessiveness as protection. The hypocrisy becomes almost comical when he warns off the female love rival (who predictably receives the villain arc) for suspecting the same interference he openly admitted to himself. FL’s wilful blindness toward the love rival is most starkly revealed when she entrusts a comatose ML to his sole care the day after hearing him declare how much he hated him, while placating the only character whose alarm at the prospect was entirely rational. Rather than prioritizing character logic or accountability, the drama bends itself around a wish fulfillment fantasy in which male love rivals are redeemed through the intensity of their feelings, however much damage those feelings caused. Obsession and naivety go unaccounted for, leaving the central romance diminished by interference the drama excuses rather than examines.
Was this review helpful to you?
