Please check your DM. Also its funny how you got mad for posting my complaint on someone else's review..Ha aha. First I did it to get you/other staff to notice, but then i found your comment below, So i thought it wud be easier to get u to notice by replying to your comment becoz it wud give u a direct notification.
Also If i was angry, I wudn't have patiently explained all this to u Hessa.
it seems you didn't get my point as you are still defending your review button. And My God ! Episode reviews?? whoever writes and reads those reviews when it has 11, 16 , 20, 50, 100 etc
So you are okay with rating but not review where it mentioned up to which episode he watched?
But i want to ask you the staff why is it allowed to write a review when the drama isn't completed? you shud disable it.
And also why is rating allowed but not review before completion? I mean many ppl dont read review they just see rating first by users who rated it before completion of drama or some without even watching one episode.
So you are telling me that if a drama has great start and become shit afterwards like SWDBS, we have to rely on ppl who rated it for first half of drama? I mean only 2 most helpful reviews can be seen on title page whereas the ratings stay the same even after the drama completed.in review it can be mentioned till the episode he watched but not in ratings.
Also there were no spoilers in the review so it doesn't hurt anyone while ratings does. So all i want to say is stop the rating and review both before completion of drama. Hope it reaches to right ears.
Let it go this time. But i want to ask you the staff why is it allowed to write a review when the drama isn't completed? you shud disable it.
And also why is rating allowed but not review before completion? I mean many ppl dont read review they just see rating first by users who rated it before completion of drama or some without even watching one episode.
So you are telling me that if a drama has great start and become shit afterwards like SWDBS, we have to rely on ppl who rated it for first half of drama? I mean only 2 most helpful reviews can be seen on title page whereas the ratings stay the same even after the drama completed.in review it can be mentioned till the episode he watched but not in ratings.
Also there were no spoilers in the review so it doesn't hurt anyone while ratings does. So all i want to say is stop the rating and review both before completion of drama. Hope it reaches to right ears.
I just started watching this but you know when you don't get popular cast due to budget cut then cast look alike actors. Thats what happened here(in my opinion).
The 19 year old one looks like Seo In Guk and the 29 year old looks like Kim woo bin. I shit you not. I had to look clearly to confirm they were not.
The premise is good and different characterisation is also good. But the 29 year old one, I mean come on. If you got crush on someone you don't go around fuc**ing people of her friends, colleages etc in front of her creating an image of playboy, slut. Then go around moping after finding that crush has fallen for other guy. Come on , what kind of shit is this character smoking??
IDK why i read it but i read the whole review.. whoa right? I also didn't like this drama and agree with you but You just shredded the drama in your review. I tght i was being critical by giving 8
I saw this mve becoz of Ji Chang Wook. I like the manipulative organization in this mve. Acting is on point. No romance here. Its a little dark theme. But very nicely done with the mve. The cast acted very well.
I still don't understand what the title meant. I thought "Fabricated crime" would be an apt title as it describes the plot. Kim Sang Ho acted as a side villan here which surprised me becoz i only saw him in roles of comedian, kind person. I couldn't take seriously his actions becoz of his previous drama effect. I would have liked a little romance b/n the hacker girl and Wook but that's my opinion.
The writers had good grip on the script, but they made villan seem fearful when he was just a near old age guy. He wud have been fearful if he had the same power as MC which he does not. The other cast feeling fearful of an old guy and giving the MC misinformation was totally unnecessay. That mister shud have told everything to Mc and also Mc shud to the fmc about accident. Sometimes the writing seems brilliant then suddenly becomes illogical. Here the powers go to 2 most dumb ppl. u can see it in their actions.
Also If i was angry, I wudn't have patiently explained all this to u Hessa.
But i want to ask you the staff why is it allowed to write a review when the drama isn't completed? you shud disable it.
And also why is rating allowed but not review before completion? I mean many ppl dont read review they just see rating first by users who rated it before completion of drama or some without even watching one episode.
So you are telling me that if a drama has great start and become shit afterwards like SWDBS, we have to rely on ppl who rated it for first half of drama? I mean only 2 most helpful reviews can be seen on title page whereas the ratings stay the same even after the drama completed.in review it can be mentioned till the episode he watched but not in ratings.
Also there were no spoilers in the review so it doesn't hurt anyone while ratings does. So all i want to say is stop the rating and review both before completion of drama. Hope it reaches to right ears.
And also why is rating allowed but not review before completion? I mean many ppl dont read review they just see rating first by users who rated it before completion of drama or some without even watching one episode.
So you are telling me that if a drama has great start and become shit afterwards like SWDBS, we have to rely on ppl who rated it for first half of drama? I mean only 2 most helpful reviews can be seen on title page whereas the ratings stay the same even after the drama completed.in review it can be mentioned till the episode he watched but not in ratings.
Also there were no spoilers in the review so it doesn't hurt anyone while ratings does. So all i want to say is stop the rating and review both before completion of drama. Hope it reaches to right ears.
The 19 year old one looks like Seo In Guk and the 29 year old looks like Kim woo bin. I shit you not. I had to look clearly to confirm they were not.
The premise is good and different characterisation is also good. But the 29 year old one, I mean come on. If you got crush on someone you don't go around fuc**ing people of her friends, colleages etc in front of her creating an image of playboy, slut. Then go around moping after finding that crush has fallen for other guy. Come on , what kind of shit is this character smoking??
Will update after watching other ep.
FMC : female main character
I still don't understand what the title meant. I thought "Fabricated crime" would be an apt title as it describes the plot. Kim Sang Ho acted as a side villan here which surprised me becoz i only saw him in roles of comedian, kind person. I couldn't take seriously his actions becoz of his previous drama effect. I would have liked a little romance b/n the hacker girl and Wook but that's my opinion.