Celebrity 
This review may contain spoilers
A great story, told without its tension
The story at the center of this show is one of the best ever written about seduction and its cost. Anyone who knows Laclos's Les Liaisons dangereuses (or its screen versions, Dangerous Liaisons and Untold Scandal): a cruel, charming libertine, a devout woman he sets out to conquer, and a scheming noblewoman pulling the strings, with all three ending up ruined. I tried to watch this as a fresh take rather than a comparison, but the core is the same, so the question is how well this version tells it. My answer is: not well enough.
The biggest problem is length. This story works as a pressure cooker, and the mind games between Lady Cho and Cho Won are the whole point. Here they keep getting interrupted by palace intrigue that adds runtime but no tension. It also leans toward tragic romance, when the story is at heart a psychological chess match that nobody wins.
The second problem is chemistry. I never felt the pull between Cho Won and Ahn Hui-yeon, or the old power struggle between him and Lady Cho. Beautiful leads do not guarantee spark, and the direction did not create it. Cho Won often plays as a caricature, and Hui-yeon's fear reads as timidity rather than a woman with real convictions being slowly worn down. Because of this, the central arc never lands. I never saw him change from a man who respects nothing into one who realizes what he could have had. The intimate scenes are explicit, but they show no tenderness, doubt or dawning feeling, which is what would have given them meaning.
Lady Cho's ending is the last disappointment. She is one of literature's great villains, and here she suffers no real consequences and moves through society as before. The final scenes then imply she was pining for him all along, which turns a schemer into a heartbroken woman and removes the downfall the story needs.
Across Netflix's Asian productions, I've also noticed sexual behavior that would carry real social weight in these cultures shown as casual and consequence-free, whether or not the story needs it. Tribhuvan Mishra: CA Topper is one example, where a married chartered accountant with a respectable day job moonlights as a gigolo for women in his community. Aap Jaisa Koi is another, pairing a conservative, socially awkward man with a much more worldly woman, while his sister-in-law begins a relationship with the woman's uncle and the film frames it as reclaiming her independence. Many viewers in these societies seem to experience this as imposed from outside rather than growing out of the stories being told. A drama like this one, set in a rigid social order, is exactly where sexuality should carry consequences, and the lack of chemistry and consequence here shows what happens when it becomes decoration.
None of this is a criticism of the cast. They worked with the scripts, direction and choices they were given, and the blame belongs with the writers, producers and platform.
A great story, badly told: the scandal here is what they left out.
The biggest problem is length. This story works as a pressure cooker, and the mind games between Lady Cho and Cho Won are the whole point. Here they keep getting interrupted by palace intrigue that adds runtime but no tension. It also leans toward tragic romance, when the story is at heart a psychological chess match that nobody wins.
The second problem is chemistry. I never felt the pull between Cho Won and Ahn Hui-yeon, or the old power struggle between him and Lady Cho. Beautiful leads do not guarantee spark, and the direction did not create it. Cho Won often plays as a caricature, and Hui-yeon's fear reads as timidity rather than a woman with real convictions being slowly worn down. Because of this, the central arc never lands. I never saw him change from a man who respects nothing into one who realizes what he could have had. The intimate scenes are explicit, but they show no tenderness, doubt or dawning feeling, which is what would have given them meaning.
Lady Cho's ending is the last disappointment. She is one of literature's great villains, and here she suffers no real consequences and moves through society as before. The final scenes then imply she was pining for him all along, which turns a schemer into a heartbroken woman and removes the downfall the story needs.
Across Netflix's Asian productions, I've also noticed sexual behavior that would carry real social weight in these cultures shown as casual and consequence-free, whether or not the story needs it. Tribhuvan Mishra: CA Topper is one example, where a married chartered accountant with a respectable day job moonlights as a gigolo for women in his community. Aap Jaisa Koi is another, pairing a conservative, socially awkward man with a much more worldly woman, while his sister-in-law begins a relationship with the woman's uncle and the film frames it as reclaiming her independence. Many viewers in these societies seem to experience this as imposed from outside rather than growing out of the stories being told. A drama like this one, set in a rigid social order, is exactly where sexuality should carry consequences, and the lack of chemistry and consequence here shows what happens when it becomes decoration.
None of this is a criticism of the cast. They worked with the scripts, direction and choices they were given, and the blame belongs with the writers, producers and platform.
A great story, badly told: the scandal here is what they left out.
Was this review helpful to you?
