What river and what sea? Let me spell it out for you since basic geography seems to be a challenge. The **river** is the **Jordan River**, and the **sea** is the **Mediterranean Sea**. These aren’t obscure places; they define the boundaries of historic Palestine.
"From the river to the sea" isn’t some cryptic puzzle. It’s a call for justice and liberation in a land where Palestinians have been oppressed, displaced, and dehumanized for decades. So, instead of acting clueless or pretending you don’t understand, maybe take a moment to actually learn something about the ongoing struggles of an entire people.
Can someone explain why none of neighboring countries wants to accept plestines? Egypt even built walls against…
Honestly, when people talk like this, it just shows how clueless you are. The situation is way more complicated than just saying “they're peaceful” or “why doesn’t anyone want them?” It’s about decades of history, conflict, and a system that’s literally been set up to keep you displaced and oppressed. Egypt building walls isn’t about hatred towards them—it’s about the mess that everyone’s stuck in. It’s like blaming someone for an ongoing disaster for generations, without understanding the root causes. You can’t just drop a bunch of ignorant assumptions and expect to be taken seriously. People need to educate themselves before making these sweeping, harmful statements. It’s not just about being peaceful, it’s about survival and the politics that make your life hell.
I suggest the youtube channel 'Travelling Israel' for a more accurate perspective.
First off, let’s get one thing straight: The "moral high ground" you've been shouting about is built on lies, manipulation, and historical distortion. Dehumanizing Palestinians to justify continued oppression is beyond disgusting. Your side can shout all it wants about being the "victims" while actively erasing the lived experiences of millions in Gaza. You want to talk about who’s innocent? Let’s start by talking about the innocent lives crushed under decades of occupation and bombings.
The "Star of David" Coin Argument: You’re really going to pull out this ancient coin thing as proof that only Jews have the right to this land? Nice try, but Palestinians have lived there for centuries, and your attempt to rewrite history by cherry-picking symbols just doesn’t cut it. The land isn’t just “yours” because of a coin that was minted thousands of years ago. You can’t claim moral high ground while ignoring the multicultural nature of the region. Jews, Muslims, Christians—they all lived here for thousands of years.
The "Palestine" Word is an Insult Claim: Here’s a reality check: Palestine wasn’t a "term to insult Jews." The Romans used it to suppress Jewish identity and erase their connection to the land after crushing the Jewish revolt in 135 CE. You can’t rewrite history and pretend that only Jews had a claim to the land, and that everyone else—like the Palestinians—were just occupying it for fun. The term "Palestine" wasn’t made up to mock Jews. It was an attempt to erase the people who were living there. But history doesn't disappear that easily.
King Herod and the Quran: You want to talk about King Herod and twist the narrative about the Jews being the victims in their own land? King Herod’s brutality was against his own people and others, and to claim that the Jewish people were somehow the sole targets under his reign is utter garbage. You can’t just toss out these historical figures to fit your agenda.
And as for what Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said in the Quran, you’re completely misrepresenting the message. The Quran is clear—it acknowledges the shared history of Jews, Muslims, and Christians. There are verses that praise the Prophets (including Musa and Dawood (AS)) and their people. So don’t try to reduce everything to a few cherry-picked verses to push a narrative of hate. The Quran doesn’t paint all Jews with the same brush, and neither should we.
Who Was There First? "Who was there first?" is a pointless question when you're ignoring the centuries of shared history. Jews, Christians, Muslims—they’ve all lived on that land for centuries. Your narrative isn’t about "who belongs," it’s about who’s willing to use violence and lies to keep power. If your argument is "we were there first," that’s not a moral justification for oppression. If we’re talking about justice, then the focus should be on the human rights of people living today, not some selective reading of history.
Stop pretending that one group has an exclusive claim to this land and that everyone else has to suffer in silence. This conflict isn’t about who has the better historical claim—it’s about human rights, justice, and ending oppression. The Palestinians are not the villains, and the Israeli government's continued violence and occupation is what needs to be addressed. You can’t claim to have the moral high ground while denying people their basic rights based on a twisted version of history.
Gazan citizens, including men, women, the elderly and even children, accompanied Hamas on Oct. 7. They brought…
This is nothing more than hateful propaganda built on baseless stereotypes, outright lies, and an appalling attempt to dehumanize an entire population. The idea that entire families, including children, gleefully engaged in atrocities alongside Hamas is not only unsubstantiated but outright absurd. It reflects a deliberate effort to strip the Palestinian people of their humanity and justify their suffering under the guise of self-defense.
Gazan Civilians ≠ Hamas: Claiming that every Gazan supports Hamas because they "voted for them" is ignorant of both the political reality and the basic principles of democracy. Gaza's last election was in 2006, nearly two decades ago. A majority of its population today are under 18 years old and had no say in electing anyone. Even if they could vote, living under siege and occupation limits any "free choice." Voting under duress isn't an endorsement.
Children are NOT Combatants: Accusing children of taking up arms and being "even more cruel than terrorists" is disgusting and an attempt to justify their deaths. Children in Gaza are victims of unimaginable trauma, displacement, and violence, not perpetrators of war crimes. The actual statistics show that over 50% of Gaza’s population is under 18, and countless children have died in airstrikes that flatten homes, schools, and hospitals indiscriminately. Who’s gleeful now?
Weaponizing Aid Lies: The "Hamas steals all the aid" trope is a lazy excuse to cut off humanitarian assistance, leaving millions of innocent people without food, water, and medical supplies. Independent organizations like the UN, Red Cross, and Oxfam monitor aid distribution and have repeatedly condemned claims like this as politically motivated misinformation. People are dying not because aid is "stolen," but because of deliberate blockades.
Human Shields Rhetoric: The "human shields" argument is an oft-repeated justification for indiscriminate bombings. Let’s get something straight: Gaza is one of the most densely populated places on Earth. Where are people supposed to go when airstrikes are obliterating entire neighborhoods? Hamas is no saint, but to absolve those bombing civilians en masse by blaming the victims is peak moral bankruptcy.
Dehumanizing Palestinian Society: The sweeping generalization that Palestinians are raised to "hate Jews" through their textbooks is a racist trope used to paint a people oppressed for generations as inherently violent. Palestinian children learn survival under brutal occupation, not hatred.
#FreePalestine Your entire tirade reflects the mindset of someone desperate to villainize an oppressed population instead of acknowledging the power imbalance and decades of systemic suffering. Opposing Hamas does NOT justify blaming 2.3 million Gazans—half of whom are children—for the actions of a militant group. If you think murdering children, flattening homes, and besieging millions is "defense," the moral compass is broken. The real outrage should be at the war crimes and the genocidal rhetoric cloaked in "security."
"From the river to the sea" isn’t some cryptic puzzle. It’s a call for justice and liberation in a land where Palestinians have been oppressed, displaced, and dehumanized for decades. So, instead of acting clueless or pretending you don’t understand, maybe take a moment to actually learn something about the ongoing struggles of an entire people.
The "Star of David" Coin Argument:
You’re really going to pull out this ancient coin thing as proof that only Jews have the right to this land? Nice try, but Palestinians have lived there for centuries, and your attempt to rewrite history by cherry-picking symbols just doesn’t cut it. The land isn’t just “yours” because of a coin that was minted thousands of years ago. You can’t claim moral high ground while ignoring the multicultural nature of the region. Jews, Muslims, Christians—they all lived here for thousands of years.
The "Palestine" Word is an Insult Claim:
Here’s a reality check: Palestine wasn’t a "term to insult Jews." The Romans used it to suppress Jewish identity and erase their connection to the land after crushing the Jewish revolt in 135 CE. You can’t rewrite history and pretend that only Jews had a claim to the land, and that everyone else—like the Palestinians—were just occupying it for fun. The term "Palestine" wasn’t made up to mock Jews. It was an attempt to erase the people who were living there. But history doesn't disappear that easily.
King Herod and the Quran:
You want to talk about King Herod and twist the narrative about the Jews being the victims in their own land? King Herod’s brutality was against his own people and others, and to claim that the Jewish people were somehow the sole targets under his reign is utter garbage. You can’t just toss out these historical figures to fit your agenda.
And as for what Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said in the Quran, you’re completely misrepresenting the message. The Quran is clear—it acknowledges the shared history of Jews, Muslims, and Christians. There are verses that praise the Prophets (including Musa and Dawood (AS)) and their people. So don’t try to reduce everything to a few cherry-picked verses to push a narrative of hate. The Quran doesn’t paint all Jews with the same brush, and neither should we.
Who Was There First?
"Who was there first?" is a pointless question when you're ignoring the centuries of shared history. Jews, Christians, Muslims—they’ve all lived on that land for centuries. Your narrative isn’t about "who belongs," it’s about who’s willing to use violence and lies to keep power. If your argument is "we were there first," that’s not a moral justification for oppression. If we’re talking about justice, then the focus should be on the human rights of people living today, not some selective reading of history.
Stop pretending that one group has an exclusive claim to this land and that everyone else has to suffer in silence. This conflict isn’t about who has the better historical claim—it’s about human rights, justice, and ending oppression. The Palestinians are not the villains, and the Israeli government's continued violence and occupation is what needs to be addressed. You can’t claim to have the moral high ground while denying people their basic rights based on a twisted version of history.
Gazan Civilians ≠ Hamas: Claiming that every Gazan supports Hamas because they "voted for them" is ignorant of both the political reality and the basic principles of democracy. Gaza's last election was in 2006, nearly two decades ago. A majority of its population today are under 18 years old and had no say in electing anyone. Even if they could vote, living under siege and occupation limits any "free choice." Voting under duress isn't an endorsement.
Children are NOT Combatants: Accusing children of taking up arms and being "even more cruel than terrorists" is disgusting and an attempt to justify their deaths. Children in Gaza are victims of unimaginable trauma, displacement, and violence, not perpetrators of war crimes. The actual statistics show that over 50% of Gaza’s population is under 18, and countless children have died in airstrikes that flatten homes, schools, and hospitals indiscriminately. Who’s gleeful now?
Weaponizing Aid Lies: The "Hamas steals all the aid" trope is a lazy excuse to cut off humanitarian assistance, leaving millions of innocent people without food, water, and medical supplies. Independent organizations like the UN, Red Cross, and Oxfam monitor aid distribution and have repeatedly condemned claims like this as politically motivated misinformation. People are dying not because aid is "stolen," but because of deliberate blockades.
Human Shields Rhetoric: The "human shields" argument is an oft-repeated justification for indiscriminate bombings. Let’s get something straight: Gaza is one of the most densely populated places on Earth. Where are people supposed to go when airstrikes are obliterating entire neighborhoods? Hamas is no saint, but to absolve those bombing civilians en masse by blaming the victims is peak moral bankruptcy.
Dehumanizing Palestinian Society: The sweeping generalization that Palestinians are raised to "hate Jews" through their textbooks is a racist trope used to paint a people oppressed for generations as inherently violent. Palestinian children learn survival under brutal occupation, not hatred.
#FreePalestine
Your entire tirade reflects the mindset of someone desperate to villainize an oppressed population instead of acknowledging the power imbalance and decades of systemic suffering. Opposing Hamas does NOT justify blaming 2.3 million Gazans—half of whom are children—for the actions of a militant group. If you think murdering children, flattening homes, and besieging millions is "defense," the moral compass is broken. The real outrage should be at the war crimes and the genocidal rhetoric cloaked in "security."
Im plannig to watch it
go back and cry in the corner hun