jplaizure

Not all middle easterns and arabs are muslims, plenty are Christians or other religions, implying its racist because its islamaphobic is implying all middle easterners and arabs are muslim which they are not. "Jizya" is a tax that is imposed on all non muslims, so it's not like they don't treat non muslims differently, if you are not muslim then the quran says they can tax you for not being one as the only reason, so they have their prejudices as well.

They have bars in muslim countries....they only serve alcohol to foreigners....also the great thing about NOT being a subject of the royalty of a foreign country is, you can say what you want about it, apologizing is basically genuflecting to the saudi royalty, why not just become their subjects?

Islam is not a race also funny how you claim Islamophobia when your religion imposes jizya on the kafir 🤣

funny how you claim Islamophobia when your religion imposes jizya on the kafir 🤣

I hope there is a season 2! it had action, comedy the story was interesting, I think people don't like it because it was not P.C or modern enough. they expect avengers cgi and every color under the rainbow flag if perverts to have 30 minutes plus of screen time to even consider something average these days.

Phobic? i am not afraid of perverts. That's a word the alphabet people made up to try to make themselves sound tough. You also contributed nothing to the debate, refuted zero of my points as well as just blurted your own opinion like a child declaring yourself correct. All of the things you stated have not had the impact you say, while my claim does, guns? only when they are used by criminals which unless you are going to live in a police state (which would still need guns) you cannot stop criminals from using. War? That protects peoples and nations, undeclared battles that start with invasions, do what you are talking about, War is when the defending side DEFENDS their own people, but i guess letting a bunch of people who want to take you over and step all over you is some sort of bottom fetish for yourself? Close minded idiots? how would they destroy a country, they are idiots, you can distract them with bread and circuses. Intimidation? That is subjective, or do you think Arnold Schwarzenegger is intimidated by the same things a random weak citizen is? As for the "just living your own life, i already refuted this, EVERY country this perversion takes place in is never just "two or more peoples who want to live their life" Take ALL of Europe and the United states for example, how many drag shows with trans people stripping occur EVERY week now? That is not just "two or more peoples living their life" That is them grooming and forcing people to accept them because their dad would not hug them or some B.S. You refuted NOTHING just like the last person. Not one single country has prospered because of accepting these people across nations, political ideologues such as monarchies, democracies or republics, not one country in time, at all. In fact the MAJORITY collapse when they give in to a free for all sex fest. The Chinese, The Romans, The Indian and Middle eastern empires all FELL when they were indulging in whichever sex act they wanted outside of HETEROSEXUAL marriage. Like i also previously stated, there are PLENTY of millionaire and billionaire alphabet people, more than enough to get the Chinese or whomever to build them an artificial archipelago where they can live far away from people you falsely call scared of them, but they never do? Why? Not because of lack of resources or money, bu because the smart ones know, they leech off of heterosexual people, if you have a society only interested in sex, they will never work, they wont maintain an electrical grid or sewage system, they won't build anything, they will engage in their perversions every day, and have infighting like they do everywhere else. They have the choice right now, even if they are not as wealthy as say Ellen DeGeneres, to sell their homes, or save money from their jobs, pool it together and create an alphabet person paradise, they CHOOSE not to. You proved nothing. Finally, You all can make your own t.v networks or streaming services as well, you mix it in to networks created by Heterosexuals and streaming services created by Heterosexuals. If you think a billionaire like Ellen DeGeneres can't make an alphabet person streaming service with all her money, that says a lot more about you than I. I believe you can all build your own paradise of artificial islands, someplace safe for every person of legal age from any country to go to, to be far away from those that would hurt them, you do not believe they can, so who thinks they are less human? Myself? Or you?

Cowards run when they can't refute points made in debates, tell me again, who do you think wins? the billions of Christians and Muslims in the world or a small minority of perverts? they lose in a popular vote and they sure as water is wet would not be able to win a war. The alphabet people cannot survive without our tolerance. I tolerate them like i tolerate a cold or migraine, i will never however condone their life choices.

You started with me, a simple web search can show things you thought to be illegal, have become legal. Bestiality did become legal in the states after gay marriage, just like it depended on which state homosexuals could be wed, so does the legality of bestiality today. For example Wyoming, New Mexico, Hawaii, and West Virginia do not have laws prohibiting the sexual assault of animals. As well as you can just search children being taken to drag strip shows, or do you thinks having a transsexual strip and twerk in front of children is teaching them chemistry? Funny you call me a bigot, i suppose those previous comments were too tedious to read, yet you still felt the need to join in like a fool without getting all the information. If i was a bigot, why would i want them to stop? According to my religion they would go to hell and i would never see them again after i die, if i try to get them to stop, i am trying to give them eternal paradise. So bigoted, i remember that time in history where that ruthless dictator gave those he hated paradise. Oh wait.....

People like you are why the west created the first amendment in the first place, you seriously think if the first amendment were taken away, your kind would thrive? all of the alphabet people put together, plus their supporters are still a minority, who loses in a democratic election? the minority vote. Nobody gives "AF"? How about the billion Catholics worldwide, the other billion Christians, then the billion Muslims worldwide? We make up half the global population, not to mention even all the people outside of our religions that find it disgusting. As for you thinking the U.S has laws against those things, pit depends state by state, bestiality is legal in some states and pedophilia is not far behind considering all the drag strip shows where liberals take their kids too these days.

Wow you must have done bad in school if you think that was an essay? Not surprising considering the side you are on in this debate.

You do have the same rights, a company representing your demographic is not a right, it's a choice of the company. You say because i have not proved how they correlate so all you'll give me is the benefit of the doubt, when you were 3 years old and did not understand how a bath made you wet, were you oh so righteous and give them the benefit of the doubt even though you did not understand it? You say "I find it hilarious that you dare criticize me for assuming your feelings, then immediately proceed to commit the same action you were once condemning me for doing" My condemnation comes from the oh so tolerant left saying doing so is bigoted evil behavior than proceeding to do the same exact thing, for example, if i told a black person in america what their words meant in a statement they made about being black in america, it would be shot down because there is noooo possible way i could understand! I do not believe in this, the left does, so to be on their side you cannot tell anyone what their words mean, or according to the same people you are defending, you are a bigot, but they'd never admit that and stay true to their own logic when it bites them in the butt, because that would be mature and not hypocritical. You ask how i can't hate them because i called them a name, it is simple, if i hated them i would not want them to go (which is my religious opinion on the afterlife) to heaven, i would stay silent, let them burn in Hell and stay away from me and my family. How can i hate a people i want to go to Heaven and be reunited with their family and God in the afterlife? Exactly you could care less, thats the difference between us, i care about your opinions and religion, you do not mine. You say you reject the premise of humans not accepting each other fundamentally, yet you also say you are irreligious, that leaves science, tell me what happens when a bengal tiger and a korean tiger meet? Do they sing a song and form a lifelong bond of friendship? According to science the same thing happens whether it be a tiger or a homo sapien and for good reason. If you have no interest in being saved because you don't believe in it, i can't force you to that would deprive you of heaven as much as your sins you choose to commit, having no interest in it? Then again you are being ignorant in the context of this discussion considering all of the western world are Christian countries, founded by Christians, maintained by Christians, It's called biting the hand that feeds you, in a family if a 5 year old says "i dont respect you or your values but keep feeding, clothing and sheltering me" how long until most parents kick the kid out? Your asking for a specific number and trying to use that as a "sticking it" point? Tell me how many victims of sexual abuse come forward on average? Do you expect me to interview the 7 billion plus human on the planet, somehow make sure they are all truthful and then get back to you? Your making demands like a child. Your citing the "jew york times"? run by the people who call you and all these korean alphabet people you love "soulless animal goyim"? Now i understand why you are the way you are, you learned all of this you are parroting from jews, who are the longest lasting, most hateful racist people on the planet, saying everyone who is not born of a jewish womb, is a soulless animal for the past 7000 years. No wonder you are the way you are. Yes plenty of people on the left are pushing for parents not to be able to "force" their kids to attend church. just like how they tell teachers not to "report" children to their parents for "coming out as homo or transexual" and in some places, even pushing for legislation so they child who can be as young as 5 gets an irreversible surgery to "correct" their gender. I'm not certain you understand the separation of church and state or why it was implemented, but seeing as you were educating in an american public school system, it's not hard to see why you don't understand. "sodomy as i like to call it"? Thats the word for anal sex between any humans....not a big difficult SAT level word...."like my "rich church officials"? you mean the ones who have no job and make less money than a 16 year old working 1 shift a week at a mcdonalds? You are talking about the church's cumulative wealth...the whole catholic institution pays for the upkeep and food of churches and priests....you say ti is a fact red states are more dependent on federal aid, tell me how much federal aid was given to red states after the BLM "riots" which were really domestic terrorism, California alone with their illegal migrant and homeless problems take in more than the entire south......New jersey depends and leeches off of NYC btw -_- . My island proposition is not ridiculous, it could be a glorious utopia far away from all the "bigots" as you like to call them (I'd love to see you preach all of this in a mosque in Iraq btw) they could live free from the shackles that supposedly hold them back and do whatever they want without judgement or legislation stopping them. They choose not to. Like i said plenty of millionaires are alphabet people, they need to pool only a little of their income together to get the Chinese to make them a few island paradises for the alphabet people. "Mess with your first amendment?" You really don't know your own rights but as an american that is not surprising, you know walking around naked is a "form of expression" as well correct? Are you demanding that right? to walk around naked in public? And you think you are on the "just" side of things? Civilized people don't want to see naked people, simulated sex etc out in public.....Also people like you love to say things like that but i doubt you've gotten the proper certification for a gun and the hours of classes you need to operate one practically...alot of your people have died because they think they can pick up a pistol like they do in a video game...Pride month? it isn't pride month its the sacred heart of Jesus month....it's a month the alphabet people specifically chose to shame Christians (because that's what well adjusted adults do) and the rainbow? that's God's promise to mankind never to flood the earth again like he did in Noah's time, (which is a symbol for Christians, jews and muslims) so again another thing they appropriated as a puerile "gotcha" like you just tried to do.

So you are going to go around anything i say to try to justify your answer? every society i mentioned fell, saying something like "morals are subjective" is one of the worst things you can do, and has already shown you are brainwashed. there have been things across nations, religions, empires and time periods where that every society has decreed to be immoral, for example cold blooded murder. Morals are not subjective, even the largest religions in the world all agree murder is wrong, while they disagree on so many other things. You say the western world is not on the brink of collapse, which is foolish, in every sense, they are. Every crime statistic has been multiplied by more than ten in the past 20 years. Murder, theft, assault, rape; the list goes on and on. I never said they were destroyed, they are on the path to destruction, the only thing in the world that has a chance of destroying a civilization in a day, is nuclear war and even that would be tough to commit in one day. You use bigot like a curse word and assume my feelings, (which just shows how ignorant you are, i doubt you would assume a woman's feelings or your elders let alone one of the alphabet people, but with me you seem fine to do so? Your morals are already on the decline and you just proved it. I am not a bigot, i do not hate them, i think what they are doing is wrong and i want them as a Catholic to join me and all of humanity in heaven, just like a want a murderer to repent, realize their crime and beg forgiveness so we can all be reunited. There is a problem teaching children, fundamentally humans do not accept eachother for good reason, the same reason chimpanzees that live 5 miles away from eachother do not tolerate and accept another group, it is a natural protection mechanism so you are not hurt. Adults can be taught what you are suggesting, not children since children rely more on instinct than intellect because they lack 20 years of being on Earth, which is precisely why they are children. You say they are scapegoats, do you know the statistics for how many alphabet people abuse minors versus catholic priests? here in the states the number for abusers of children that are alphabet people is almost 1/3rd and that is with the government protecting them, The catholic church? less than 1% and we have over 1 billion in population. using statistics like you are is a straw man argument and a false equivalency. I took law and philosophy in university as my majors, you aren't going to win by using tactics a high schooler knows. You completely moved on without refuting my previous points, so after you do so, i will answer your ending questions.
But to make it easier for you i'll give you an example of why your argument makes no sense, in school here in the states teaching religion is forbidden, but teaching 5 year olds about anal sex is not. The church is already under legislation, so your argument makes no sense. Finish my previous question of telling me one society, just one that did not suffer from within by legalizing the alphabet people, as well as tell me how they are not parasitic when they take in more money and resources than they produce. Like i said before, there are plenty of them who are millionaires, the Chinese and Arabs are making artificial islands anyone can buy, that fall outside of their court of law, which means easily, very easily, all of a great amount of the alphabet people could live on a tropical island, drinking and engaging in their sexual desires daily, far away from "the bigots" but they do not. Like i also previously stated they are too concerned with sex to build or maintain any kind of society, look at the east or west, do you think either of them could eb as great as they are today, if not for thousands of years of the leaders telling them to not just drink and have sex everyday? But to work, learn in school and get married? Plenty of civilizations where the heterosexuals engaged in debauchery daily, fell within a few generations, the societies that engaged in chastity until marriage, discipline of the mind an body, are the ones who prospered. Not a single society of even straights just having unbridled intercourse whenever the desire struck them, has made anything of themselves in history.

"Years" is less than 2 generations, tell me how many problems for a society do you consider fine by using less than 2 generations as a sample size? What am i talking about? The middle eastern empires, the European empires, the oriental empires. Every single one. You can use ambiguity in your country by using part of what i have said then laughing to make yourself feel better, or validate your own opinion in your own mind and get lazy people to validate you. All of the countries which you did not even name, again using ambiguity to make it so you have a wide net to cast for your argument, instead of being specific like an adult, all of those countries gave the alphabet people their "rights" well after they were already developed, their infrastructure, their wealth, their military, every single thing had already been established decades beforehand. As for "they seem to be doing fine" In the U.S we have school teachers showing children as young as 4 illustrated books showing simulated sex between homosexuals and transsexuals, while hiding it from their parents and telling their children to lie to their parents about it, "Pride" parades with children present, with men with dildos on their head and only wearing a thong dancing on a float down the public quarter. Children being taught that they not only need to accept these people, but celebrate them or they are a bigot and will be punished accordingly.
Billions of dollars that should be being used for people on welfare who are starving or homeless, being used to make grown men feel validated and accepted for sticking their genitalia in another man's butthole. The internet, modern cell phones, HDTV almost everything you use in your life daily came out before These people got rights, tell me; how many new and what invention(s) do you use since 2010? 15 years and barely anything has been made. we had more progress in the 1820s than we do today. As for my statements on it never working in history or not preceding the downfall of great countries or empires, it is one of the only things the east and west have in common, when the Korean kingdoms, Chinese, Japanese, English, French or Roman empires started resting on their laurels and letting these "people" gain rights and run rampant instead of hiding in their closets, their empires fell within a few generations. Not a single one of you have proved me wrong, you use speech like a middle schooler to question me, but never refute me. Because you think you are progressive and benevolent, when in reality you are ignorant and malevolent. Again like i have suggested at least here in the U.S their are homosexuals with BILLIONS of dollars, the Chinese make artificial islands for pennies compared to that, they could hire the Chinese to make a new country for themselves, one where no one can say anything wrong or bad about them, but they don't they live their lives full of debauchery and victim hood, because they know no way to live without breastfeeding from the metaphorical teat of already established societies.

Is English not your first language? Because i do not want to be mean to someone who learned it as much as you have. But if it is your first language then i feel bad for your parents. It's in the word, homoSEXUALITY. You use the same arguments as an American liberal such as "why do you feel the need....and woke people are sexualizing everything?" Why do i feel the need to speak about these things you ask? I already stated why, it has been the downfall of every, single, civilization. There is not one place on Earth in any time period where these people and their "sexual revolution" did not cause the downfall of great empires and republics. Not one example. People in the west like to cry "It's because of Christians! They hate gays! They persecuted them so of course everyone suffered!" But this is not the case, plenty of empires before Christianity even existed had these alphabet people and every single one fell. I could go on about why it is bad in a religious sense, but if you ore the OP cared about that, you would go to a Priest yourself to learn why and possibly repent. I never condoned straights who only think about sex, it's just straights have the option to think of sexual intercourse as more than just intercourse, it leads to building a family of your own blood and making children. A homosexual can have sex all they want and it will be nothing more than sex. Going on about asexuality to try and bring validity to your argument is sad, that is a tacitic children use to try and validate their opinions. You say the majority of alphabet people are not obsessed with it. Maybe that is your personal experience, but in mine and history's that is not the case. It's one of the only things that connects to western and eastern history, people whether they be homo or heterosexual who are obsessed with sex, bring the downfall of those around them. You say i have a distaste for homosexuals, why is that supposed to be insulting? According to myself and a BILLION other Catholics as well as another BILLION Christians of different sects as well as another BILLION Muslims on the planet, we all have the same distaste. Thats 3 billion people who agree with myself. They are on the same level and comparable as to those who commit pedophilia or bestiality it is called "Paraphilia". You call them gross while saying you are a person who is not heterosexual, you are a pot calling the kettle black. At-least be consistent with your opinions, so i can try to have an iota of respect for them. Your last sentence is complete nonsense, what heterosexual person commits homosexual intercourse? some random outlier who told you they were straight and continue to do so then engage in homosexual intercourse? I never said they were those things, i said it leads to it. Then you try to bring race into this, you are reaching very far to try and make your point all based on your personal opinions, mine are opinions based on religious texts that have existed for over a millennium and every single empire that has existed in recorded history, there is not ONE example where the empire did not fall soon after allowing "free love".
Here is a haiku of what i think about yourself, please read my previous rebuttal and try to have a coherent one of your own.

"Chittering monkey, in the spring he climbs treetops, and thinks himself tall."

lmao the fact you thought the infection I was speaking of was homosexuality proves my point 🤣 you provided no rebuttal for my original point, then had a childish outburst and made it all about you and sex. I said wokeness was the disease. people like you are just a symptom of it. crying about everything and not even comprehending a middle school level English paragraph. you never refused my original point, all of you have never been a boon to any society you infect, since before Christianity was even a rhing, in empires where your kind were not persecuted but treated as any other. Everyone with a working brainstem knows why, as you just proved all your kind think about is yourself and your orgasms.

Baseless accusations meant to insult without a rebuttal or any statement refuting my points, yup you're already infected by the disease known as wokeness. Seek help from your elders who have not been infected as well.

Horrible, Netflix and the west are promoting this gay stuff to do to South Korea what they did to North America and Europe, disgusting gross propaganda to normalize sodomy. There is no place in the world this has made things better, it is the first step in destroying a country. Next like in the states and Europe they will try to make pedophilia and bestiality normalized. Only by destroying a country's morals can they take control. They will make the two sides fight against each other to make money off of both of them, then bleed them dry and move on.

I agree I'm going to use your logic to get any and all male characters written by women banned. how could a woman understand what it's like to be a man?

Woah are you being anti semetic and islamaphobic? Thats a no no for netflix. it doesn't matter if the show was about a different planet with no native muslims and only koreans, Netflix doesn't allow that kind of talk otherwise you're a bigot. And as for your "Buddhism doesn't have a similar structure as Christianity" Yes it does lol, you have to be moral to achieve nirvana, not someone who gives into their base desires or causes negative karma. For example, sleeping with someone outside of marriage, being promiscuous in public or another place of worship. They are very similar in morality as most religions outside of Judaism are in Eurasia. But please continue to try and debate me on the topic, i assure you i have never read the bhuddist sutras, the koran or the torah, i'm just a simple american boy who don't know nothin about any stupid non muricans or their beliefs or t.v shows and movies but somehow watch kdramas...... -_- And finally as for your "using the religious rites made the scene possible" Totally i mean there is no way if her father was a politician giving a speech and they were out in public doing the same exact thing it would have a negative impact on him or make him uncomfortable as well as others right? Teenage Korean girls go out in wet shirts with no bra all the time in public? Please you're not even defending anything except your own like of the show, which if it is invalidated by someone having qualms with a company that promotes films like "cuties" of literal prepubescent girls dancing like whores in tight clothes, and several films making fun of specifically Christianity like that film they made about Jesus being a gay hippie. Then do your research. The problem is Netflix itself and unless you're the heir to the founder of the company and have nothing better to do than argue horrible points on a message board, i have no idea why you are being so defensive of teenage girl characters showing their nipples in wet tshirts on a kdrama, perhaps because you are some sort of pervert and want more content like that?

Yeah i totally couldn't tell they were disrespectful or immature when they used a hair straightener on the main character, or when they stole her money, i needed it to be cemented by making fun of a religion and sexualizes characters below the age of consent. You wanna watch stuff like that? Pull an Epstien and buy a private island and bring girls there. Also like i said beforehand, i DOUBT Netflix has the courage to pull off a story where girls or even women pull that in a Mosque, Jewish temple or a Buddhist one.