Well, that's why I said that I'll try to keep it short. It can be trained but I highly doubt normal users have the time or the need to do that. Let's say, you'll always sound like an aristocratic prick, sipping on an afternoon tea, reading from Encyclopedia Britannica.
You're welcome! I'm sure there are a ton of articles on the internet on how Ai affects people from the art world. For one, they spend hours in creating those so generating it with a tool and claiming authenticity and originality is just morally wrong.
In the BL world, not to bore the audience here any further, it also has a very dark side. People often generate images of their ships/favorite couples, which are borderline fake and can hurt the reputation/image of actors to say the least. Not sure how it is in other countries, but in the EU, it's punishable under certain Ai regulations and restrictions.
This could turn into a very long conversation, which I'm sure, I'll enjoy but I'll try to be short. Any Ai tool similar to ChatGPT, Gemini, etc. sources from texts (in your case as it can be image, sound, code ...) which were written by people somewhere, whether on paper in books, encyclopedias or on the internet (Wikipedia for example). It depends on what the model was "fed" with, the outcome can vary.
Why I pointed out that your reply (part of it) is Ai generated? Because the problem with ChatGPT is that it always uses a language, which can sound a bit academical and for now, it doesn't provide an alternative. It cannot mimic your writing and is instantly noticeable.
With thus said, if you need a grammar/spelling tool, Grammarly (also an Ai tool btw) works better than ChatGPT as it doesn't alter your text by adding additional bits and basically rewriting it for you.
As for the art, there are image/video generating tools who work similarly to the text generating ones. These tools are using databases that include images and also descriptions. Depending on what you ask for: colors, style, etc they generate a new image by taking bits to fill in the pixels, so to say.
The issue is that it can never be unique as it uses existing art, someone, somewhere already drew it and also can be seen as violating copy rights.
It was! I was searching for one comment and stumbled upon yours in the process. 😁 It's been 7 freaking months! I was happy to read how right we were in all our predictions for them. Bring us WU! 😁
3 
4 
In the BL world, not to bore the audience here any further, it also has a very dark side. People often generate images of their ships/favorite couples, which are borderline fake and can hurt the reputation/image of actors to say the least. Not sure how it is in other countries, but in the EU, it's punishable under certain Ai regulations and restrictions.
Why I pointed out that your reply (part of it) is Ai generated? Because the problem with ChatGPT is that it always uses a language, which can sound a bit academical and for now, it doesn't provide an alternative. It cannot mimic your writing and is instantly noticeable.
With thus said, if you need a grammar/spelling tool, Grammarly (also an Ai tool btw) works better than ChatGPT as it doesn't alter your text by adding additional bits and basically rewriting it for you.
As for the art, there are image/video generating tools who work similarly to the text generating ones. These tools are using databases that include images and also descriptions. Depending on what you ask for: colors, style, etc they generate a new image by taking bits to fill in the pixels, so to say.
The issue is that it can never be unique as it uses existing art, someone, somewhere already drew it and also can be seen as violating copy rights.
I hope that explains a bit how these tools work.
As for Shell, I did, unfortunately, even before he was sacked. There are some serious allegation against him. It will be the court to decide, not me.