aghhh, isn't the case of zhang zhehan a little bit more complicated than reducing it to your list. I get you though…
Wikipedia says In 2021, Zhang faced severe criticism in China after being involved in a controversy over photos taken years earlier in Japan at a spot near the Yasukuni Shrine and Nogi Shrine due to the shrines' honoring of imperial Japanese military officers who invaded China. This criticism resulted in the removal of his online social media accounts, movies, television shows, and music. In December 2022, Zhang returned from a year of domestic boycott with the release of new music on international platforms outside of mainland China.
They were acting, they dont date for real or have sex. There is nothing moraly wrong.
First of all, who appointed you to be the protector of the children? And where is the protection supposed to be here? You use very strong and powerful words, but have no content. Whoever makes laws and regulations must also justify them, but you refuse to do so by only focusing on the age difference and then not even tolerating a spectacle. How old can an actor be who plays the leading role with a 16-year-old? Or are minors not allowed to accept such roles at all, because in real life they are allowed to fall in love with another 16-year-old, but as an acting role it is forbidden? I would like to exchange ideas but we don't do that right now, you slam your conviction around my ears and when I ask and insist on mistakes, then you want to end the conversation. That's not good style and that's not how you protect children. As I said, in Germany we assume that there is not a bang at 18 and then you are done growing up, but that it is a process in which young people must also be given freedom to mature and develop. I take it from you that you really only want to protect here, but if you are serious about it, you have to ask yourself where the protection ends and where you overstep the mark.
They were acting, they dont date for real or have sex. There is nothing moraly wrong.
in this case you better call it the ancient prudish world. And if you look, so much supporter of your Opinion are not seen- And you told us just your Opinion, but never justivy it. And again especially when its just acting and more acting love between 2 minors. we are far away from child abduction. Its ok, when you dont like it, i think just you should accept, that other countries have better laws and social standards
My problem is not a sad ending, my problem is when they torment us with the tragedy over an entire episode and show all the people from all angles in their pain. Romeo and Juliet ends with their deaths, there is no switch to the funeral and the parents are filmed crying at the grave. This is unnecessary and unimaginative. Especially since this was only supposed to be a show for the second season anyway. If it's going to be a sad ending, then it's short and straightforward. Anyone who has ever buried loved ones is sad at the thought and does not need more than 50 minutes of tutoring. I've only experienced such crap before at the Miracle of Teddy Bear, where they torture you with grief and funeral for almost an hour, then put in 15 minutes of slapstick and then explain in 15 minutes that everything is fine again and everyone is happy and satisfied. Corrosive
They were acting, they dont date for real or have sex. There is nothing moraly wrong.
Germany, Our sexual criminal law is based on the idea that it must also be possible for minors to approach partners without them having to fear making themselves liable to prosecution. We do not want to enable older people to approach minors, but minors to discover / develop their sexuality without obstacles from outside. Therefore, criminal liability is immediately given if it is not consensual or if the consent is bought. So prostitution with minors is always punishable.
They were acting, they dont date for real or have sex. There is nothing moraly wrong.
Nonsense, its al love story of 2 Minors, Therefore, it is not inappropriate to cast these roles with a minor. It's also not porn or erotic thriller. And the 28-year-old also only plays one role, it's acting. And the role is a relationship between two people of the same age. In my country, by the way, the relationship between a 16-year-old and a 28-year-old would not be punishable as long as it is consensual and based on free will. I don't want to be rude, but it seems to me that the problem is more likely to take place in many minds.
That was a real roller coaster of emotions, you have to process that first. I found it interesting that each of the group actually embodied certain characters. Especially Fluke, the opportunist who always looks away and thinks only of himself. He may not be the main culprit, but he is the one who has always had the chance to interfere and prevent the drama. Next to Top, they are actually the most despicable characters, because they had nothing to fight with and were not in any constraints.
Yuan Danop looked at the forever unfinished show that was the turning point for Chinese BL being censored and…
the main thing is, he did a really bad job. Compared to stay with me, the script is worse, the Characters are worse, the chemistry is not so good as between Wu Bi and Su Yu. While there was always a mood, here everything seemed so played out without any depth.
i come to peace with the ending because of the clip on youtube,, the deleted scene. Also if they ended the seson after the beach trip and you think thats an happy end, you dont knwo whats happens tommorrow. So all you presumed happy ending are just a snapshot, the seen luck could always gone away the next day.
They set a better endindg as Stay with me, but thats all. The serios is ok, but not really god. Stay wiht me has a bettter development, of the characters and the relationship of the ML is much mor understanble and uneffected. I think my problem is, that i fistly watchted stay with me 3 weeks ago for the fist time and then watched this.
after looking the thai adaption of addicted, they had the better idea for the Season final. Just end ist after the trip to the beach. The cliffhanger was to big. i was really shoked and angry after fist watching. But in rewatch and the deleted scenes i become clear that the series is one of the best ive ever seen. And also if they ended before the cliffhanger at the beach, you dont know what future comes. Only in fairy tales the lovers live happy until their live ends. So i find my piece and hoping for seaseon 2 but in fact i dont need it not so much as before
An actually nice series that is fun, you just can't think about the story because it's mostly idiotic. More detailed…
As some have already written, there is a lot you can't understand, the two don't talk about a desire to have children for 6 years, because she once overheard at the birth of her godchild that he wants to wait and he doesn't say 6 years because he expects her to express the wish first? You can also overdo it with the Green Flag. The fundamental misunderstanding is also hard to understand. Where did he confess his love to her? On a scrap of paper that he has put in a book. And then simply asked if she had read the book and had something to say. Then she says no and he thinks she has rejected his declaration of love? Even the declaration of love itself was already a bit weakly formulated. And the story gets completely out of hand after the breakup, you don't want a fake relationship anymore and then get married to continue living as a fake, no intimacy, no kiss sleeping in separate beds. He doesn't want to tell her that he loves her and she thinks that she doesn't need to say anything because he doesn't love her anyway. And everything changes when you read the old school newspaper.
An actually nice series that is fun, you just can't think about the story because it's mostly idiotic. More detailed justification in a spoiler. Nevertheless, you can look at them well.
an old Law sentence is There is no equal treatment in injustice. The double standard is yours, cause you decline injustice because others doing also injustice.
AF wouldnt get Jail in Germany, the things he commited are not so crimimal and he did active repentance, he was…
Ok i forgot the lockup, thats indeed is a deprivation of liberty. But also this was enough for jail. i unterstand your point, but as long the People who knows about his crime doesnt tell anyone there are no more consequenses than apologize to cake
a Roman legal There is Ubi non est iudex, ibi non est querens. Where there is no plaintiff, there is no judgeAnd…
In Germany, it is even a prerequisite for minor offenses, with a few exceptions, that the person concerned files a complaint at all. Only in the case of serious crime is the investigation carried out ex officio. Whereby this is because rape and coercion were to be committed. To me, the storyline does not seem to be an advertisement for such an approach. People need to realize that forgiveness is a highly personal matter to which the guilty person is not entitled. In this respect, the description of such an event is not a yardstick for other cases
Thats classic censorship
How old can an actor be who plays the leading role with a 16-year-old? Or are minors not allowed to accept such roles at all, because in real life they are allowed to fall in love with another 16-year-old, but as an acting role it is forbidden?
I would like to exchange ideas but we don't do that right now, you slam your conviction around my ears and when I ask and insist on mistakes, then you want to end the conversation. That's not good style and that's not how you protect children.
As I said, in Germany we assume that there is not a bang at 18 and then you are done growing up, but that it is a process in which young people must also be given freedom to mature and develop. I take it from you that you really only want to protect here, but if you are serious about it, you have to ask yourself where the protection ends and where you overstep the mark.
I don't want to be rude, but it seems to me that the problem is more likely to take place in many minds.
The fundamental misunderstanding is also hard to understand. Where did he confess his love to her? On a scrap of paper that he has put in a book. And then simply asked if she had read the book and had something to say. Then she says no and he thinks she has rejected his declaration of love? Even the declaration of love itself was already a bit weakly formulated.
And the story gets completely out of hand after the breakup, you don't want a fake relationship anymore and then get married to continue living as a fake, no intimacy, no kiss sleeping in separate beds. He doesn't want to tell her that he loves her and she thinks that she doesn't need to say anything because he doesn't love her anyway. And everything changes when you read the old school newspaper.