Sterile mastery that needed to breathe to get the full points
Let me be honest.
Nirvana in Fire and I didn’t exactly get off on the best foot. I gave it a try a while ago, got to episode 20, and tapped out. Why? Because it felt sterile. No x-factor. Just... flat. I couldn’t for the life of me understand why it needed nearly 20 hours to build its world. That’s practically a whole K-drama length just to get going! And to me, that was too long a wait for something that didn’t feel like it was giving enough in return.
But then came a rewatch—this time with my mom—and I have to say, the experience was completely different. Watching Nirvana in Fire with someone else makes it a much easier watch. You can pass the time together, bounce theories around, and discuss the tangled web of court politics and family trees that the show throws at you. I also started following along with FangirlVerdict’s blog, which was a lifesaver. With so many characters, titles, and interwoven backstories, having a guide is almost essential. Pro tip: if you're going to tackle this drama, I highly recommend (1) watching with someone, (2) using a blog or guide, and (3) joining an online watch party or discussion forum. You’ll thank me later.
Now, even during my first attempt, I could tell Nirvana in Fire was objectively very good. The writing is sharp, the storytelling tight, and the character work? Phenomenal. Everyone is well-developed with clear motivations, and the emotional arcs especially the themes of justice, loyalty, and redemption are noble and deeply rooted. The acting is also top-tier. Seriously, some of the best performances I’ve ever seen.
But still… it’s sterile. There’s no warmth, no spark, no organic emotional pull. It's odd because it should have that as it’s got the cast, the production, the gravitas and the music but it’s almost like the script was so focused on elegance and restraint that it forgot to breathe. It’s as if the writers were so reverent of the original novel that they got scared to add any texture. And 54 episodes of that sterile, ultra-controlled tone? Whew. That’s a lot. Hence an 8 to what is a 10/10 show.
All that said, I’ve changed my stance. I used to have Nirvana in Fire on my “not worth the hype” list. But after rewatching with new context and appreciation, I get it now. It’s a cerebral, restrained, and beautifully crafted historical that takes its time—maybe too much time—but delivers in its own way.
So yes, I stand corrected. It’s worth the hype… just make sure you’re in the right mindset (and maybe bring a buddy and a blog along for the ride).
Nirvana in Fire and I didn’t exactly get off on the best foot. I gave it a try a while ago, got to episode 20, and tapped out. Why? Because it felt sterile. No x-factor. Just... flat. I couldn’t for the life of me understand why it needed nearly 20 hours to build its world. That’s practically a whole K-drama length just to get going! And to me, that was too long a wait for something that didn’t feel like it was giving enough in return.
But then came a rewatch—this time with my mom—and I have to say, the experience was completely different. Watching Nirvana in Fire with someone else makes it a much easier watch. You can pass the time together, bounce theories around, and discuss the tangled web of court politics and family trees that the show throws at you. I also started following along with FangirlVerdict’s blog, which was a lifesaver. With so many characters, titles, and interwoven backstories, having a guide is almost essential. Pro tip: if you're going to tackle this drama, I highly recommend (1) watching with someone, (2) using a blog or guide, and (3) joining an online watch party or discussion forum. You’ll thank me later.
Now, even during my first attempt, I could tell Nirvana in Fire was objectively very good. The writing is sharp, the storytelling tight, and the character work? Phenomenal. Everyone is well-developed with clear motivations, and the emotional arcs especially the themes of justice, loyalty, and redemption are noble and deeply rooted. The acting is also top-tier. Seriously, some of the best performances I’ve ever seen.
But still… it’s sterile. There’s no warmth, no spark, no organic emotional pull. It's odd because it should have that as it’s got the cast, the production, the gravitas and the music but it’s almost like the script was so focused on elegance and restraint that it forgot to breathe. It’s as if the writers were so reverent of the original novel that they got scared to add any texture. And 54 episodes of that sterile, ultra-controlled tone? Whew. That’s a lot. Hence an 8 to what is a 10/10 show.
All that said, I’ve changed my stance. I used to have Nirvana in Fire on my “not worth the hype” list. But after rewatching with new context and appreciation, I get it now. It’s a cerebral, restrained, and beautifully crafted historical that takes its time—maybe too much time—but delivers in its own way.
So yes, I stand corrected. It’s worth the hype… just make sure you’re in the right mindset (and maybe bring a buddy and a blog along for the ride).
Was this review helpful to you?
