His personality is typical of the authors MLs. Very intrusive and meddlesome with a lot of free time.
Oh, I'm not unfamiliar, so much as just tired of the trope's overuse!
I think I'd forgive it more if he were given at least some personal quirks or interests, like teasing his subordinates, having a dog, or playing an instrument, or just something that indicates a personality. Something! Instead he's only ever laying around with seemingly nothing to do other than sometimes striking a dramatic pose after cartwheeling through the air.
You'd think head of special police would at the very least be drowning in paperwork, right? The result is he appears to have oodles of time on his hand and nothing better to do than get in her way. Or strike dramatic poses.
Four or five episodes in, and this Duke Su is really starting to bother me. Are we supposed to find him attractive for being so goddamn nosy about something that really isn't his concern? He's established she's irrelevant to his main mission, yet he continues to act like he's quite free to interrogate on things that are not only none of his business, but equally irrelevant.
Does he turn out to not be the main love interest, or does he get knocked down a few pegs (or more like a whole ladder) at some point? Because right now he seems more like a stalker, if the stalker's a cop with all the power and none of the oversight.
Not even halfway through the first episode, and clearly they'd rented the wirework system and by golly they were gonna get their money's worth. Along with the blowers (for those wonderful wind-blown twirling shots) and the dust/smoke effects (makes kicked-in doors all that more impressive), and boy are the foley guys hard at work, too.
I personally think it's a bit much by my taste, but I do have to give the filming crew props for fully committing to the bit.
Enjoying this series for the third time. Love binging this on weeknds. Absolutely my favourite ZLH & EY drama.…
Re-watching while I'm waiting for FoF to finally drop, and despite knowing the answers this time around (as to the various schemes, I mean), there are parts that make even less sense, now. Especially when characters stay 'in character' even when no one's watching -- even our intrepid little spies drop the act when they're alone or it's just the two of them.
But the cinematography's still so well-done, the actors are all pretty, the clothing and sets are gorgeous, so who cares about logic anyway? >.<
I’m just going to pretend that the last few minutes of the drama didn’t happen and everyone got their happy…
Personally, I recommend just stopping at the 3rd-to-last episode, or around there. The last two episodes seem to mostly be a whole lot of bathos and exposition, including for characters who were never onscreen. (Looking at you, extended cameo.) And the second half of the last episode is utterly pointless.
ususally Yang Mis acting is hella stiff but I will gave this a try anyway
I've seen her be more lively in some roles, so seems like she chooses these flat-affect roles on purpose. Maybe she just finds them more fun, easier, idk. Y'know, the way LYN likes to die before the end. Guess everyone has their own quirk.
I finally figured out the one word that fits the director's style for the vast majority of his work in the past ten years: PORTENTOUS. He's quicker to fall down than to get up when it comes to payoffs, but boy is every work stuffed to the gills with hints and insinuations. Absolutely portentous.
Well, seeing how I know I've seen at least two dramas that were finally released years after being ready (went back & checked: ~3 yrs and ~5 yrs), it's always possible at some point this might be trotted out. But at least in the mid-term, I'm not betting on it.
Yes it does sort of remind me of GBU - it was a Clint Eastwood classic I studied in a summer school class ages…
Ugly got shot during that threeway and died, while Bad couldn't shoot b/c Good had removed the bullets from his gun. In the end, Good and Bad each get half the gold.
I'm just waiting for someone to say the line, "There are those with guns, and those who dig. You dig."
So far, pretty skillful retelling of The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly but set w/in run up to and/or ongoing internal Chinese strife (not unlikes GBU's setting being mid-Civil War). GBU is three men looking for stolen confederate gold: Ugly learns the name of the guy who knows the gold's location; Bad learns the location; Good learns which grave it's in. So Good and Bad have to cooperate, while Ugly is right behind them. Also, Bad and Ugly both have gangs, while Good is working solo. Any of this sound familiar?
As for the soundtrack, that echoes of Morricone's iconic theme show up when the little constable arrives on the scene, seems to me he's clearly the Good. Except that in this case, he's not the Man With No Name, he's the Man Whose Name No One Seems To Care About. Being a backwater hick from the Chinese equivalent of Podunk, Kentucky.
So I guess that makes Mu Qing the Bad, and Bufan the Ugly? Problem is I can't remember which of them actually does want to get the treasure to Sun Yatsen (Wen). If the storyline doesn't break too far from its inspiration, then Good and Bad should split the treasure and part ways, after they both take down Ugly. Frankly, GBU is three guys very much each in it for himself, while Heroes is three guys, none of whom are doing it for themselves.
Episode 4, at around the 15-minute mark, there's a fight scene. It starts like usual bgm, and quickly includes a bit of Chinese opera, very faintly, blending in... and then it segues around the 16-min mark, and stg that's the opening theme to Good, Bad, and the Ugly. Wanh-wanh-nah-nah, once or twice, and then a bit of the guitar lick that follows. It's not loud about it, but it's unmistakable, and it absolutely cracks me up that when we get it is when our beleaguered but determined little constable is kicking someone's ass. Fistful of Dollars, you betcha.
anyone knows who wrote this show? i do love guo jingming directing tho his slow motion and close up preference…
Sadly, he usually writes his own stuff ... theoretically. He has a bad history of plagiarizing works (usually lesser-known, and frequently Taiwanese and thus less familiar to most mainland audiences). I think that also includes plagiarizing his own writing team, at some point. He's been dinged on it repeatedly, which is why I remain surprised he's even allowed to continue directing/writing. (All this before we even get into his long-held pattern of sexually harassing and/or humiliating young actresses.)
I mean, when just a _hint_ of tax wrongdoing can derail a person's career permanently, you'd think _multiple_ plagiarism cases, _proven_ cases, would at least make someone persona non grata in the industry. He was black-listed for a time, and eventually did write a public letter of apology, well, technically. (According to friends, the letter's tone was more of a "geez sorry if you were offended" kind of non-apology.)
I do like his cinematographic style (in terms of lighting and framing but agree with you on the over-use of slow motion) but ethically there are days I'm really uncomfortable with enjoying his work. Honestly, I'd enjoy it more if a screenwriter with credibility -- who wasn't him -- got sole credit. Then we might also get an ending that actually works.
And now it (and Emperor's Love) are both gone from IQiyi's Coming Soon lineup. Part of me wonders if they're doing it to see who notices, and see how loud fans scream.
Looking at the trailer, I see Guo remains in love with one specific tracking shot, where it starts on the MC and pulls back to reveal one by one other characters, standing between the MC and the camera's eye, then stops on the fixed tableau. There are worse signature moves, I suppose.
Don't underestimate the value of the villa with large garden in the center of ShangHai. Someone on Douban said…
Yeah but if those pearls were real, at that size? The pink necklace -- round pearls in large size -- would start at 7500 USD. It's only "a few pearl chains" if they're fake or cultured. If they're real, and saltwater, three or four like that might would be a nice-sized trust fund on their own.
I think I'd forgive it more if he were given at least some personal quirks or interests, like teasing his subordinates, having a dog, or playing an instrument, or just something that indicates a personality. Something! Instead he's only ever laying around with seemingly nothing to do other than sometimes striking a dramatic pose after cartwheeling through the air.
You'd think head of special police would at the very least be drowning in paperwork, right? The result is he appears to have oodles of time on his hand and nothing better to do than get in her way. Or strike dramatic poses.
Does he turn out to not be the main love interest, or does he get knocked down a few pegs (or more like a whole ladder) at some point? Because right now he seems more like a stalker, if the stalker's a cop with all the power and none of the oversight.
I personally think it's a bit much by my taste, but I do have to give the filming crew props for fully committing to the bit.
But the cinematography's still so well-done, the actors are all pretty, the clothing and sets are gorgeous, so who cares about logic anyway? >.<
I'm just waiting for someone to say the line, "There are those with guns, and those who dig. You dig."
As for the soundtrack, that echoes of Morricone's iconic theme show up when the little constable arrives on the scene, seems to me he's clearly the Good. Except that in this case, he's not the Man With No Name, he's the Man Whose Name No One Seems To Care About. Being a backwater hick from the Chinese equivalent of Podunk, Kentucky.
So I guess that makes Mu Qing the Bad, and Bufan the Ugly? Problem is I can't remember which of them actually does want to get the treasure to Sun Yatsen (Wen). If the storyline doesn't break too far from its inspiration, then Good and Bad should split the treasure and part ways, after they both take down Ugly. Frankly, GBU is three guys very much each in it for himself, while Heroes is three guys, none of whom are doing it for themselves.
*ponders*
I mean, when just a _hint_ of tax wrongdoing can derail a person's career permanently, you'd think _multiple_ plagiarism cases, _proven_ cases, would at least make someone persona non grata in the industry. He was black-listed for a time, and eventually did write a public letter of apology, well, technically. (According to friends, the letter's tone was more of a "geez sorry if you were offended" kind of non-apology.)
I do like his cinematographic style (in terms of lighting and framing but agree with you on the over-use of slow motion) but ethically there are days I'm really uncomfortable with enjoying his work. Honestly, I'd enjoy it more if a screenwriter with credibility -- who wasn't him -- got sole credit. Then we might also get an ending that actually works.