She was a huge hypocrite who kept claiming she's a girl's girl, but ended up sending a bunch of guys after Nanno…
I really hope you are not defending Blossom, she basically hinted to men to gang-rape Nanno cause she felt jealous of her success. Even before that she turned on her "ideals" by reporting her to the principal the second she saw her as competition hence not really caring to defend women's rights as she was pretending to.
It's always been Nanno's thing to do things that trigger others to act out their worst sides. That's the whole point.
Kinda feel like I'm being baited every EP. I will have some expectations based on the clips but will then get…
While I think people should do whatever they want it's also good to be aware how it can unfold in reality. I think it's meant to represent that even if it starts with the idea of being free, the competition makes it so you don't really have a choice if you want to make any profit. Having rose-tinted glasses on reality wouldn't really be feminist.
I disagree with someone here complaining that this season is more realistic. It's nowhere near realistic enough!! They are still not doing enough to display the amount of danger that they are putting themselves in with prostitution. It was actually season 1 that did more in that area and it was just 2 minutes of seeing some of Yuki's clients' behaviour. Yuki was lucky that she got away from those guys. Women are on average not as physically strong and being in a dark area like that they could have just ignored her and proceeded to do whatever they wanted. They are almost portraying prostitution as something empowering and what does that teach young impressionable viewers? Yuki could have been stalked, raped, killed. We didn't get a single story that portrays the danger enough. Unfortunately I know people that would for sure not care even they have seen that, because they want to minimise the danger in their head and focus on the instant gratification and that's even sadder. That doesn't mean it's not important to display the negative aspects of a dangerous job like that.
Never understood why something like Emi's case is not considered delusion. It's straight up a type of delusion believing you can affect your life circumstances with wishful thinking. She spent millions (in euro) over that. She also just let that guy touch her?? I would have made sure everyone knew what he did. I could understand freezing up and saying something later, but why did she not do anything about it? I would genuinely appreciate if someone explained this kind of thinking.
Watched the first episode. So far it feels like they are misunderstanding the character.
The suicide scene was... eugh. She has never made a point to mock someone who hasn't done anything wrong or displayed potential for wrongdoing. Really bad first impression.
Original Nanno would highlight the absurdity of human behaviour and feeling and the focus was on them. This Nanno seems too attention seeking idk how else to put it.
Admitting who she is also feels wrong. She would find a way to go around it.
I don't agree with the ending message. Not everyone who has been hurt will turn out the same way.
If someone tell you have a "wicked disease" and "terrible disease" and you are rejected by society to have some…
These things do happen and people who act wrong might understand how wrong their behaviour is if they see it from another perspective. Showing bad things that happen is about developing empathy in people by showing them what life is like for others. If you don't want to feel bad about disease you shouldn't watch a whole show about disease, it's obviously not going to be a pleasant thing to watch.
It's always been Nanno's thing to do things that trigger others to act out their worst sides. That's the whole point.
Never understood why something like Emi's case is not considered delusion. It's straight up a type of delusion believing you can affect your life circumstances with wishful thinking. She spent millions (in euro) over that. She also just let that guy touch her?? I would have made sure everyone knew what he did. I could understand freezing up and saying something later, but why did she not do anything about it? I would genuinely appreciate if someone explained this kind of thinking.
The suicide scene was... eugh. She has never made a point to mock someone who hasn't done anything wrong or displayed potential for wrongdoing. Really bad first impression.
Original Nanno would highlight the absurdity of human behaviour and feeling and the focus was on them. This Nanno seems too attention seeking idk how else to put it.
Admitting who she is also feels wrong. She would find a way to go around it.
I don't agree with the ending message. Not everyone who has been hurt will turn out the same way.