Barbarela

I can see you had a ready-made message and a vocabulary to match your level of education. I do not need a response from you, because you are saying nothing relevant.
According to your “intelligence,” everything is corrupt, and the law in Korea is merely formal. Yet everything that circulates online, even if unverified, automatically becomes “documented.”
In your “logic,” KSH has remained defamed for a year simply because he is rich. Then I do not understand why he did not use that wealth to cover everything up more quickly, but is still waiting for his criminal complaint to be resolved.

One thing is certain about you: you lie even about your own posts. It’s not the first time I’ve noticed that you edit your comments many hours after you’ve already received a reply. You should reevaluate your treatment; maybe then you’ll remember better what you say and what you do. Under these circumstances, a real dialogue with you is not possible. I’m waiting for you to get well… if that miracle will ever happen.

It would be better if you didn’t rush your responses so much and paid more attention to what you read. You jump to your own conclusions and then respond off-topic. Tell me clearly: where in my comments did you find the questions “Tell me what he did” or “But what did he do?” You talk about desperation, but your tone shows exactly that. Before trying to correct others, it would be wiser to check your own statements so you have a basis for what you’re claiming.
You said that “KSH’s crimes have been publicly documented and that’s still not enough for idiots like you.” Fine...documented where exactly? Posted online? Who verified the authenticity of that “evidence”? I suggest you read Article 307, paragraph (2). KSH requested a forensic examination of the evidence presented by KSR family and Garosatan. For this reason, his criminal complaint was filed under paragraph (2). That means he asked for all the photos, screenshots, messages, and recordings used to accuse him to be OFFICIALLY VERIFIED.
So don’t come here acting loud and trying to “educate” others without understanding what has already been written. Wait for those “evidence” you invoke so confidently to be presented to the authorities and subjected to an OFFICIAL EXPERT EXAMINATION. If they are authentic, they will be able to support a legal accusation against Kim Soo Hyun. He has clearly given those accusing him the opportunity to bring all this evidence before the police and prove its validity.
What else should he have done KSH? If the evidence were real and incriminating, he could have simply filed a defamation complaint under paragraph (1) and won. Instead, he requested official verification of the evidence. This points to something quite obvious: he has nothing to hide and chooses to defend himself through legal means. Neither you nor others relying on a YouTuber’s claims will establish the truth. The competent authorities will do that.
Until then, we wait for the results of the investigation. And those who made the accusations should present that evidence officially, not just spread it online.

This person ( sankk...h) edited her comment and removed the part where she said the new government would exonerate him. She often does this, changing her posts after receiving replies.

She seems very knowledgeable about stimulants and sedatives, a subject she appears to have studied extensively.However, it seems that her current treatment is not helping. She may need a higher 💊 or something stronger; perhaps then she will recover… if she does.

@Dss There's no point in paying attention to her. Apart from barking and keeping an eye on KSH page, she doesn't know anything and can't make any arguments... just woof, woof. The only thing she can accurately tell you is who's posting here. So you can't expect much from her.

You can’t have a conversation. You’ve already proven that. I’ll let you talk to yourself , it’s the only level you can reach.

You are ignorant. You have no arguments, you only attack and hide behind meaningless words.

I think you’re talking about yourself, and you seem quite interested in this page. You came here to throw accusations, and now that you don’t have arguments anymore, you’re trying to twist things around.

Clarify this for me. You made a statement, now support it.

Can you also tell me why he has to pay money, and why he needs to be saved?

I am writing this for those who are still trying to label KSH as guilty without an official decision or verdict. The actor has already filed a lawsuit in which he calls on those who made accusations online to support their claims officially before criminal investigation authorities and the court, with verification of the authenticity of the messages and photos.
If those accusations were real, the risks for him would be very serious:
1 👉 He risks losing the case in court if the evidence confirms the accusations made.
2 👉 He may face criminal charges if the alleged facts prove to be true.
3 👉 He could be forced to pay significant damages.
4 👉 He would suffer major consequences for his image and career.
5 👉 He has already incurred very high legal costs, which could become total losses if he loses the case.
That’s why you should understand that 👉 in court and in criminal investigations, rumors do not matter, only officially verified evidence does. Only in this way can the truth be established.
➖️ An essential detail: if he had been guilty and knew that those accusations were true, he would have chosen the simplest option 👉 a strict defamation case 👉 without filing a complaint for defamation based on false information, a dispute in which evidence is demanded and verified.
The fact that he chose this path sends a clear message:
👉 “PROVE IT OFFICIALLY.
👉 Present the PHOTOS and MESSAGES you used to accuse me online and show that I am guilty.”


https://kisskh.at/people/424-kim-soo-hyun#comment-22983834

If those “pieces of evidence” are real and truly prove what is being claimed, then he is doing himself the greatest harm by asking for them to be brought into court. Because there, it’s no longer about posts or opinions, it’s about officially verified evidence.
In that case, he risks losing the trial, facing criminal issues if the accusations are confirmed, having to pay damages, and most likely completely destroying his career.
The court examines everything: whether the evidence is authentic, the context in which it was created, and whether it actually proves anything.
Therefore, requesting that this evidence be brought before the court is a risky decision, especially if there is a possibility that it is authentic and incriminating.

I don’t think you understand how things legally work, and your “evidence” doesn’t really mean anything. Kim Soo Hyun has requested that the exact “evidence” you are presenting, the same ones the accusations rely on, be brought to court, not just photos or conversations posted online.
In a defamation case, those making the accusations must prove them with real, verifiable evidence. The court does not take everything found on the internet at face value; it verifies whether that evidence is authentic and whether it actually supports the claims.
And honestly, think about it for a moment: if he were guilty, why would he officially ask for all the evidence to be brought before the court? That would mean exposing himself.
By doing this, he is clearly saying: bring the evidence and prove it.

I just asked you to prove why you obsessively hate a person you don't know, but you talk dirty about him without being able to argue. From our entire discussion it is clear that, apart from the insults you proudly utter, you have no support. So which one of us is out of his mind and needs psychological help?

Is this real? https://www.threads.com/@visualloopstudio/post/DVMmSg7DBaz?xmt=AQF0QwFsPjB68rP5Lm8aVjhVIatD6FFOcMX7iz1qrS-fxcWYTBV-gjO_SoRYHe-6gIs9ONa2&slof=1

This is how things are online...nothing is verified. That's why there are laws, so people like you can't vilify just because they saw something on YouTube.

My dear, I asked you for evidence for your claims, and you come up with the line “even if the evidence was in front of you”. That doesn’t justify your actions. Who do you think I am? Do you think I base my thinking on everything that appears online?
I asked you for one very simple thing: to tell me where you get your information about Kim Soo Hyun and his agency. Please show me the official accusations that support everything you claim. If you follow the news, you will see that even brands are not winning their case at the moment, precisely because they were based on rumors. The truth always has the last word.
You are defaming an actor without being able to clearly demonstrate the reasons for doing so. You should be more restrained, because such accusations made without evidence damage a person’s reputation. It is not right to tarnish someone’s work just because you take the liberty of accusing without letting that person defend themselves.
What country do you live in? Is guilt determined online in your case? If you're right, prove it with arguments supported by facts and an official verdict. That's the only way you can show that you're in good faith

They are tiresome and illogical. They harass online, but they can't explain or prove why they do it. They repeat words whose meaning I don't even understand, but they insist on defaming an actor without any responsibility. When you ask them for explanations, they disappear like donkeys in the fog or resort to verbal aggression, because they can't back up their claims.

I can be on this profile because it is a public profile, not your personal one. I replied to your message to clarify certain aspects related to her death and I repeat: the culprits for her death are her family, online bullies like you , and her own bad choices.
Don't try to implicate other people.
Show me official evidence for all the accusations you are making. What are the legal documents or court decisions that support your claims?
Sae-ron was married and divorced (divorced in 2024). There are official documents that confirm this.
Kim Soo-hyun sued everyone who defamed him and demanded in court that the evidence of the accusations be presented. If he were guilty, why would he ask for evidence himself? Would he have incriminated himself? He chose the legal path, not the scandal and all the media madness
In all his years of career, he has not been involved in any scandal.
No photo that has circulated online confirms a relationship with Sae-ron from when she was a minor. All the images that have appeared publicly are from when she was an adult. What do you base your claims on?
Apart from insults, you do not present any concrete evidence. Without evidence, all you do is slander.
When you respond to this comment, please provide clear legal evidence for your accusations, not just words. I am waiting for the evidence.

You copy and paste the comments of haters, repeating the same miserable things and insulting an innocent person. Try to understand once and for all: the fact that the date of d...h was recorded on a certain day does not automatically mean that that is the day the d..th occurred.
Give me legal proof for all the statements you make. Is there a note explaining her actions? You don't even know for sure if it was su!c!de. There is no autopsy made public, and the TRUTH could contradict your assumptions.
She was married. Where was the husband in all this? Furthermore, her family neglected her and, in many ways, exploited her for financial gain.
Whether you like it or not, Kim Sae-ron did not live the "saintly" life you are trying to portray. Stop using the term "p3do" because you have no evidence to support such an accusation.
Regardless of your opinions, Kim Sae-ron was no saint. She had relationships with many men and suffered because of haters like you and the wrong choices she made. Turning everything into a story that you can't prove is just slander. PROVE WHAT YOU ARE STATEING, don't just attack to cover up the responsibility for the statements you are making.

Provide evidence, not insults. I didn't ask you for anything out of the ordinary.
You published a message in which you make serious accusations, so it is natural for you to explain what you are basing your statements on and support your statements with evidence.
It's very simple.