A legal show that deserves all the attention
This show was so fun and engaging, i found myself at the end wishing it was longer than just 12 episodes.However, the writing could have benefited from a few changes. I could tell some of the legal aspects of the trials were not as credible, and i’m not a legal professional.
likes:
- the main characters and their storylines
- the comedic timing of this show was A+
- i appreciated the lack of romance
- i loved seeing queer and disabled representation, especially in a kdrama
dislikes:
- the last trial felt rushed
- the initial cases felt too over the top melodramatic and felt unrealistic in a way that you could tell they were written for a show
- i didnt like what they did to Jung-in’s storyline in the end
Was this review helpful to you?
Love it or hate it
I started watching this with goodwill, but it got more ridiculous for me. It pulls out all stops with sentimentality and the practice of law became more and more unbelievable. This would suit audiences who are able to suspend their beliefs and buy into the miraculous defense lawyers who are able to turn all cases their way, if not immediately then through appeals. Also, it cheapens the complexities of issues by making the opposition an incompetent lawyer cardboard bad guy who apparently is high up on the professional tree. It works for some people especially those who are passionate about the raised issues. The drama works less well for those interested in exploring complex issues through thoughtful engagement. There are other K dramas that do that better.Was this review helpful to you?
Serious Topics Meet Safe Storytelling
Before starting, this looked like a drama I would love: found family, case-to-case structure, emotional stories, and an actor I enjoy watching. And while I do think it’s a decent watch and I don’t regret starting it, it didn’t fully hit the way I expected.One thing I noticed is that the show often starts cases very strong, targeting serious social topics that really should be talked about, and the first half of each case usually gets me emotionally invested. But then, instead of following through with that same seriousness, the second half often pulls back into unrealistic, overly dramatic or convenient resolutions that avoid dealing with the real systemic problems. It feels like the drama wants the emotional impact of heavy topics, but not the responsibility of fully committing to them.
The show tries to sell found family, but I personally never fully felt it. There was always someone hiding something, people being annoyed with the MC, and even major conflicts later on that made the group feel more like coworkers than a real family.
I’m all for comedic relief in heavy shows, but the comedy here is often too over-the-top and cartoonish for my taste. It sometimes broke immersion and reminded me that I’m watching a drama instead of pulling me into the story. The same goes for the constant “villain of the week” antagonists who act unrealistically in court, it simplifies complex social issues into just fighting bad people instead of bad systems.
One thing that personally disappointed me was how carefully the show handled LGBT topics. There were supportive visuals and moments, which I appreciated, but the show never actually centered an LGBT person’s real legal struggle as a case. It felt more like symbolic support than real storytelling, which as an LGBT viewer felt a bit safe and surface-level.
Overall, I think Pro Bono has a strong premise and good intentions, and some moments really work emotionally. But for me, the combination of exaggerated comedy, unrealistic resolutions, and shallow character exploration keeps it from becoming as impactful as it could’ve been. Still a decent watch, just not the emotional hit I was hoping for.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
The Most Important Law K-Drama of 2025 (and to date?)
much like user @/eighthsense, i feel that many of the ratings have been lazy, hateful slop. i want to promote more critical analyses and media literacy that don't come from a point of hate and close-mindedness.if you are turning on a show called PRO BONO and hoping for anything less than a raw fight for marginalized communities, i really don't know what to say other than to please learn about the world around you..
what should the law and those expected to uphold it stand for if not human rights? that is the very essence of what a pro bono lawyer fights for. i do not want to engage with anyone who does not have basic empathy and tries to cut down this show using terms like "too woke", genuinely refers to the lgbtq+ community as the "alphabet community", etc. and there's been way too much of that in this review section. and no, i will not have a discussion with someone that believes using very clearly harmful language is a human right lmao.
•
Pro Bono is a show that does well in many aspects at confronting social issues and injustices affecting South Korea. I do not believe that it is a perfect show, and I actually do have quite a few issues with it—but many of the things it stands up for, and how strongly it does so, in comparison to many of the other law dramas I've seen—is something that i can get behind despite its imperfections.
i have never seen a more outspoken law drama than this one and that goes to how it has brought attention to not only marginalized communities, but the social issues/injustices plaguing them.
the sheer amount of representation (while it is not perfect) of communities like: the physically disabled, Deaf and HoH community, immigrants and foreign workers, abortion and reproductive rights, teenage mothers, impoverished individuals and families, family abuse & violence, sexual abuse against children and adults, predatory contracts and business practices, child workers and unfair wages, the list goes on and on! ^i personally believe that it is commendable to see such a wide variety of people represented, but that is Not to say that we should settle for what we got. Pro Bono was successful in many ways, but also fell short in others. I personally agree with @/eighthsense in that they presented progressive ideals and abandoned them in a way that may have upheld neutrality as the aim. as someone who is well-educated on the topic of abortion, i was not personally swayed by such "neutral" resolutions, and i agree that it is important to see such ideas through-- that a teenage girl forced to give birth is not a throwaway plot point, but also something that deserves a real fight. much like the lgbtq+ representation, which was something i was excited about- only for it to barely be featured despite repeated visual references. i would have greatly enjoyed and appreciated a case on lgbtq+ rights, but i can acknowledge the minimal representation it did receive.
representation matters. and stopping here would be foolish. Pro Bono is a great stepping stone for the fight for marginalized communities in South Korea. in recent years, we have seen a bold increase in media representation and depiction of marginalized communities, yet still so many Koreans (and people internationally) shiver at the mere mention of "lgbtq+" of "women's rights". not to mention that same-sex marriage is not even legal in South Korea, further outlining the need for the acknowledgment and protection of queer people under the law-> something this drama highlights on a mainstream stage such as Netflix with famous actors.
continuing the fight, appreciating the effort that was made to uplift such communities, and to be able to engage in productive conversations as to how it can be improved, is how we can take strides forward. forward to a day where it is not seen as a "too woke agenda" for literally just people being shown on screen. (and people who use woke as insult are just 🤦 .... another conversation)
Pro Bono is a great drama that skillfully spotlights those in the dark. In a way that calls us out of passiveness and into action, especially in Kanghoon and Kaya's respective cases. They are my personal favorite cases simply because of how real they are for many people. They are very dynamic cases and I could tell that Pro Bono did not run from illustrating the huge mental toll that these issues cause and perpetuate.. I could rave about them so much for great storytelling and a raw confrontation of how things really are, But also! they sre Not devoid of their flaws (such as: the aforementioned instance of abortion rights for a teenage girl playing only a minor part in the case).
I was truly feeling alongside the characters. Such real and unfortunate events are not things that exist only in media. There are countless people who face these hardships every single day and are forced to accept them, because they are not receiving the attention, respect and justice they deserve. Shows like this that work to destigmatize such communities and their lived realities, is how we can begin to draw that attention. Aaand continuously fighting for them, making media that properly highlights them—without pulling any punches—is how we can maintain and expand that attention.
I highly highly recommend this show in sincere hopes that those who watch are able to interact and engage in such media without sacrificing empathy nor critical thinking. many of us are so extremely privileged who see the problems depicted as nothing more than a show, it is something we can turn off, and for some, it is even something that can be reduced to some kind of "shady agenda."
Pro Bono is an amazing drama and I have so much love for those represented, so many feelings and a deep and renewed sense of inspiration to fight for others, but it is also a drama with its shortcomings--none of which are for being "too woke" but for actually not being woke enough.
very brief definition of "woke" to clarify what I mean when I use it: (woke originates in AAVE meaning to be aware and alert of racial injustices against the African American community, and has expanded/ been co-opted(?) to include a broader scope of social injustices--which is the context in which I use it in this sentence above.)
other things that rubbed me the wrong way that i have not seen mentioned by others, random unnecessary parts of the script such as: ["Dawit? Are you from Israel or something"] --rough quote-- and the random inclusion and presentation of AI-generated/altered videos as a good tool? among other glaring issues mentioned by users like @/eighthsense
needless to say, Pro Bono is not the show to turn to for a "fun", "lighthearted" legal drama. And for those who only look for that, I ask you to re-evaluate yourself and your priorities.
it is impressive that people will turn on a law drama and not only expect, but demand only palatable, "non-heavy" topics that reinforce their privileged ability to ignore real world issues and stay in their bubble of "tis folly to be wise".
they hide behind statements like "intense division is not what i want to watch in a kdrama, i'd rather see neutrality" when in reality they're uncomfortable with the mere idea of representation for marginalized communites, much less a deep dive into the REALITIES of how they are treated in the same korea they routinely consume and expect 'mild', 'lighthearted' media from.
it is one thing to want an escape from reality, a silly show you can turn on to laugh at and mindlessly enjoy. but it is another to bash on one that sheds light on the same ideas you refuse to acknowledge as MILLIONS of people's realities.
i ask those of you living in your koreaboo fantasy, expecting korean media to cater to you and your ignorant worldview, to wake up. South Korea is not all rainbows and sunshines, and yes! there are Queer Koreans, there are disabled Koreans, there are muslim Koreans, there are Koreans who are the bad guys you so badly want to ignore, and there are Koreans who dedicate their whole lives to fighting for the world you wish to ignore and boil down to "K-Dramas".
I have many many many thoughts on this drama and as an inexperienced reviewer, I apologize if my thoughts were a bit all over the place, but I hope it was clear that: I stand by the overall positive message of always fighting for human rights, but not the specific ways in which it was poorly executed and the backpedaling that was employed to pacify certain audiences.
Pro Bono was a big step forward in many ways, but there are still countless steps to take!! Do not turn a blind eye to injustices and always carry empathy and kindness in your heart. before accepting a review's words, please first reflect on whether or not it is centered on humanity and compassion.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
A Meaningful Law Drama
The main reason I decided to give Pro Bono a try was Jung Kyung Ho. I’ve always enjoyed his acting and consistently liked his past dramas, so there was really no reason not to check this one out as well. Overall, Pro Bono is a fairly decent take on the legal system in South Korea. What stood out most to me was its focus on pro bono side of the legal world that many law kdramas don’t usually place at the center of the story. The various cases, usually spanning two or so episodes, were quite unique and sometimes unexpected, which did keep me engaged.That said, the comedy didn’t always work for me. Some of the loud, exaggerated moments felt a bit forced honestly. They often came across as unnecessary and occasionally even annoying. But can be avoided by skipping through those scenes (atleast that's what I did).
Kang Dawit's transformation from a career-driven, self-focused lawyer into someone genuinely shaped by the clients he represented was the most compelling part of the drama. His growth felt gradual, believable, and well-earned.
Jang Yeongsil’s quieter arc was another highlight. Watching him grow into someone courageous felt very real. SPOILER STARTS: The scene where he confronts his estranged and abusive father, struggling to gather the courage to speak up, was raw and emotional. I found myself truly rooting for him in that moment, and the actor delivered it well. SPOILER ENDS
All in all, Pro Bono feels uneven at times, but it’s a drama I don’t regret watching. If you’re drawn to legal dramas that prioritize social issues over spectacle, this one is still worth your time.
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
One of the Best Legal Dramas in 2025!!
Jung Kyung Ho really seems to be settled in, portraying characters from the legal field!This was my second time watching him in a legal drama after “Oh My Ghost Clients” and I really loved watching him spout legal expertise in both shows. Of course, both shows portray him with an antagonistic vibe and a redemption arc. Although I’m a huge fan of Jung Kyung Ho, I went into the show with zero expectations. It was mainly because I had never heard of pro-bono lawyers. In short, they are lawyers who represent low-income class victims with low or, in most cases, zero fees. I’m not sure if it happens in most Asian countries, because the legal field never offers anything for free. It is as cutthroat as other fields. So, watching this show was like a fresh breath of air. I have lost count of the number of times, I cried whenever any of the team members made a convincing overture to prove their client’s point in court; impoverished victims looking for someone to represent them and seek justice. The entire legal team in this show gels well; they do have their disagreements initially, especially Kang David who isn’t impressed with joining a pro bono team that makes no money. But slowly they evolve together, he begins to train them to win cases, albeit using his time & tested tricks. They learn to respect him, despite the shady choices he makes at times, because David’s heart is at the right place.
Read the complete article here-
https://kcdramamusings.wordpress.com/2026/01/13/pro-bono-series-review/
Was this review helpful to you?
Light-hearted and Easy-To-Watch Legal Drama
Jung Kyung Ho is great. He mixes comedy into his acting very comfortably. However, the rest of the Pro Bono team was a bit theatrical for me. I might just have watched too many Kdramas and am getting tired of this style of comedic acting. Otherwise, a light-hearted, easy-to-watch law drama. You can feel the sincerity through each actor's portrayal and the cases.Was this review helpful to you?
A intriguing courtroom drama with unique perspective
I've seen many courtroom dramas in all sorts of languages but this one definitely gave me a new perspective after watching it.Let's start with the positives:
1. The script- I think this is one of the most well written scripts I've seen in this genre. Sometimes concept dramas often fall into the trap of having dialogues that sound like textbooks. Like the character is speaking directly to the audience to deliver a message. But this drama perfectly balanced the message delivery with hints of realism that it mostly felt natural
2. The characters- I liked that we had an imperfect character. Without his imperfections, I don't think I would've liked him as the lead. Even the background characters had distinct personalities and interesting character arcs.
3. The acting performance- Jung Kyung Ho pulled off such a complicated character with such realism and ease that I felt like he was a real human being. Even the other main characters and supporting characters (special shout out to the minors and extra actors) did such an amazing job is portraying complex emotions.
4. The different legal concepts- This show delt with new and interesting legal issues that is often overlooked like animal abuse, medical autonomy, crime against immigrants, filial crimes etc in a sensistive and bold way. Other shows often focus on sensational topics and major crimes that it felt refreshing to see these topics that are often overlooked.
Now let's move onto the negatives
1. The revenge arc- I was looking forward to Dawit's revenge arc the most and it was interesting but it did feel slow compared to the other episodes. They focused too much on the moral dilema and backstory, whereas I wanted to see more of the legalities surrounding the case
2. The pacing- The first half had amazing pacing. The balance was right for me, nothing felt too fast or too slow but the second half definitely felt slower.
3. The tone shift in the second half- I understand that the cases delt in the second half were more serious but the reason why I was hooked in the first few episodes was because of the humor and lightness irrespective of the case seriousness. It kind of dried up in the second half and even the comedic relief chracters didn't have humorous scenes which was a little disappointing
Overall, I liked this drama and would recommend to anyone who likes this genre or even a beginner who wants to explore courtroom dramas. 8 stars 🌟
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
From the stars to the stables
I love Jung Kyung Ho's character, cunning and intelligent, yet playful.It's a shame that because of a video showing him being corrupt, he's demoted from a prodigy judge to the newest addition to a small, dank "PRO BONO" law firm.
Far below his expectations, he makes a deal to work there for only one year, after which he'll be nominated for chief judge. Since the agreement stipulates a 70% success rate, he'll give it his all.
The cases he'll take on are truly unique, but with his acumen and the cooperation of his team, they'll achieve good results.
Unfortunately, the video circulating about him reaches his colleagues, who begin to doubt his actions.
At that point, the man who wanted to frame him turns to his own team to defend him.
So he finds himself in court having to defend himself against his own subordinates.
From episode 9 onwards, the situation becomes even more interesting. The ending is consistent with his personality, and I could see a future "Pro Bono 2" coming up.
Was this review helpful to you?
Beautiful stories
This was the perfect ending. I don't know what else to say. I had the time of my life watching this show. It was amazing to watch a show that made me laugh, cry and scream. I literally got to watch the characters go through so much growth, and what can I say, man, the main character was so well written. Honestly, all the characters were exceptionally well-written. I loved watching each story unfold, and it's just beautiful to watch people getting their well-deserved justice. There are new characters every episode, and yet the main characters will still always have your heart. Just perfect.Was this review helpful to you?
A mix between Vincenzo and Oh My ghost Client !
Pro Bono, it's the last flower to conclude 2025 on a good note, the story is good well made, we got a mix of interesting client and character and our two main lead are really funny.Without giving a spoiler, the show depict the day of "Pro-bono" lawyer. Which for a mysterious reason, are joined by a former popular judge.
Each episode is 1h, which is quite long since, the format on each episode is totally different from the previous one.
We can have 20 min about an hearing but 40 min painting the consequence or lack of consequence that the case can have. Or we can have 1h episode about an hearing, and a second about the appeal.
My only downside, with the show, is how the time is portrayed, it's a legal show but like Extraordinary Attorney Woo, the pass of time seems unrealistic. Or they don't show what happens during the time where they get the case and have the hearing.
Also what happens for the main character story during this time.
Update :
Honestly, I think the show, needed to have 16 episode. And not 12, because the last 4 episode was sort of a rush.
The acting are still fantastic, but the character development, was the biggest flop on my part.
Was this review helpful to you?
