Saints2727

I actually understand where you’re coming from, and I don’t think your frustration is invalid at all. The tonal shift with the FL can feel jarring, especially when you look at what she was involved in and how serious those actions were. From a purely emotional standpoint, it makes sense to feel like the banter and light moments came too easily, especially considering what happened to Father Gabriel.

That said, I personally interpreted her character a little differently. To me, the show wasn’t trying to excuse or erase her past, but rather show that people who’ve done wrong aren’t automatically beyond redemption. The drama leans heavily into the idea that everyone in the story is morally flawed — including the priest himself — and that change doesn’t always come in clean or perfectly paced ways.

I don’t think the intention was “you must like her because she’s funny,” but more that her humor and awkwardness were defense mechanisms not redemption itself. Her growth wasn’t instant or noble, and I agree the execution wasn’t always perfect, but I saw it as the writers showing someone slowly confronting guilt rather than being instantly forgiven for it.

For me, the heart of The Fiery Priest was never about moral purity — it was about grace. That even people who’ve done ugly, selfish, or cowardly things aren’t necessarily beyond saving if they choose to change. I can totally understand why that didn’t land for everyone, especially with how heavy the crimes were, but that theme is what made the story resonate with me personally.

So yeah, I get the criticism — I just think the intent was less about whitewashing and more about showing redemption in an imperfect, uncomfortable way.

Honestly, same 😭💛 This is such a comfort series for me. I actually came back for a rewatch and I can’t even explain how much more I loved it the second time around. Knowing where the story goes makes you notice all the little emotional details, the quiet moments, and the growth that you kinda miss the first time.

It hits so differently on a rewatch — everything feels more intentional and meaningful. I’d honestly recommend giving it another watch if you ever feel like it. It made me appreciate the story and the characters on a whole new level 🥹✨

I totally get why you’re frustrated — that ending annoyed a lot of people 😩 But for me, Rikokatsu was never really about “learning how to live together” in the practical sense. It felt more like a story about learning how to love someone not because they fit neatly into your life, but despite the things that make it difficult.

The whole drama kept showing that love alone isn’t enough if two people can’t accept each other’s values, timing, and personal paths. The separation wasn’t meant to be romantic or ideal — it was frustrating on purpose. It showed that sometimes love means letting someone walk their own road, even when it hurts and even when it feels unfair.

I agree the “career separation” trope is exhausting, but in this case I think it was less about glorifying sacrifice and more about showing how incomplete their emotional growth still was. They wanted to be together, but hadn’t yet learned how to truly meet in the middle. In that sense, the ending looping back to uncertainty kind of fits the message: love isn’t a finish line, it’s something you keep failing at and relearning.

That said — I 100% feel you 😤 I also wish Japanese dramas would stop relying on long separations and work-first endings. Sometimes we just want to see people actually choose each other and make it work for once.

I get what you’re saying, but I think Rikokatsu wasn’t really trying to clearly condemn or promote patriarchy. To me, the drama’s main focus was more about learning how to love someone despite their differences, flaws, and upbringing — not because of them.

The story showed how deeply ingrained values, especially in traditional families, can cause emotional distance and misunderstandings. The female lead’s reactions, including how she dealt with her father-in-law and her own family, felt less like endorsement and more like a reflection of emotional exhaustion, cultural pressure, and trying to keep peace rather than “winning.”

Rather than being a feminist statement or a critique of patriarchy, Rikokatsu felt more like a quiet, realistic portrayal of marriage, compromise, and emotional growth. It showed how messy relationships can be when love exists but communication and expectations don’t align.

And honestly, the leads carried the entire drama — plus Pale Blue by Kenshi Yonezu added so much emotional weight to the story. 🎵💙

P.S Watched this Drama two years ago and came back for a rewatch and its still SOOO GOOD!!!

What are you on????

No, not at all, especially when every comment about his statement on respect is based on assumptions rather than facts. When he mentioned respect, it doesn't automatically mean he condones his grandfather's actions. So, while your comments may be true in some situations, this isn't one of them.

Following** but we get it great comment

Having completed the series, I can confidently say it's a beautiful work, despite a few plot holes in the timeline towards the end. Every aspect of the show is captivating. It begins as a lighthearted romantic comedy, exploring the intriguing concept of our female lead traveling to the future and navigating a repeat of historical events she experienced in the past—only this time, 200 years later. Unsurprisingly, around episodes 10 to 12, the series takes on a more serious tone. However, this transition is executed seamlessly, making the series a must-watch. It’s definitely going on my list of comfort shows.

At no point did I find it boring or slow-paced. I recommend not paying too much attention to negative comments; instead, experience the series for yourself. It's better to watch it and decide for yourself than to miss out on a potential gem.

Please take a moment to read my message again. At no point did I mention that we must respect his grandfather. It seems there's been a misunderstanding of my words. The issue isn't about hiding his background; there's no need for secrecy. However, you're making assumptions about knowing his grandfather, which may not be accurate. The anger you're expressing isn't healthy, and it seems like my words aren't being fully understood. Once you've calmed down and have a clearer understanding of my comment, we can continue this discussion. However, if you choose to keep misinterpreting and altering my words to fit your narrative, then our conversation ends here. Blessed Day.

Firstly, I urge you to have another read of what I wrote and think about the definition of “pure evil.” At no point did I mention sympathising with Nazis. My focus was on discussing the concept of respect and how it doesn’t imply agreement with everything someone has done, like his grandfather’s actions. Your perspective is from behind a screen, without truly knowing him. The points you raise don’t align with the issue I was discussing, aside from illustrating what I was explaining. For example:

“Wow... what you wrote is pure evil. So we should sympathize with Nazis? With Japanese occupying and torturing Koreans for like 50 years? No way, dude. What is bad, is bad, and there can be no respect whatsoever for evil.”

Your comment involves making assumptions about me, much like what others are doing with Sota. This tendency to assume reflects a narrow viewpoint, as you mentioned earlier. It’s important to consider multiple perspectives rather than focusing solely on one narrative.

I understand your point, but it seems that nothing particularly significant occurs in those scenarios. Just seconds after the female lead meets the stepmother, the male lead arrives, warning her not to proceed for her own safety. However, when she decides to meet the stepmother a second time, the male lead overcomes his trauma of the annex to reach her. The stepmother intervenes in business matters only once, and she knows precisely when to assist the company. This is why the grandfather mentions how he kept her around; because she's good at doing business.

I’m currently watching the series and just reached Episode 10. As I reflect on the negative comments I've seen, I can't comprehend why some people find it boring or the characters' actions baffling. The ending of Episode 9 featured an incredible plot twist that has me even more engrossed in the series. Don't let the negative feedback deter you; with only 12 episodes, this series is sure to captivate and surprise you. I'm genuinely thrilled to see what unfolds next!

It seems there might be a misunderstanding about the concept of respect. Respect is about recognizing and admiring qualities such as courage, loyalty, or selflessness in someone, even if you disagree with them on many issues. For instance, during a war, each side believes they are the "good guys," fighting for a just cause. While one side may see themselves as saviors of their country, the opposing side might view them as invaders or killers. The key point here is that expressing respect for someone, like a grandparent, doesn't necessarily mean endorsing all their actions or beliefs, especially in complex historical contexts. It's important to remember that respect can coexist with disagreement, and sensitivity shouldn't overshadow the nuances of such discussions.

It seems there might be a misunderstanding about the concept of respect. Respect is about recognizing and admiring qualities such as courage, loyalty, or selflessness in someone, even if you disagree with them on many issues. For instance, during a war, each side believes they are the "good guys," fighting for a just cause. While one side may see themselves as saviors of their country, the opposing side might view them as invaders or killers. The key point here is that expressing respect for someone, like a grandparent, doesn't necessarily mean endorsing all their actions or beliefs, especially in complex historical contexts. It's important to remember that respect can coexist with disagreement, and sensitivity shouldn't overshadow the nuances of such discussions.

It seems there might be a misunderstanding about the concept of respect. Respect is about recognizing and admiring qualities such as courage, loyalty, or selflessness in someone, even if you disagree with them on many issues. For instance, during a war, each side believes they are the "good guys," fighting for a just cause. While one side may see themselves as saviors of their country, the opposing side might view them as invaders or killers. The key point here is that expressing respect for someone, like a grandparent, doesn't necessarily mean endorsing all their actions or beliefs, especially in complex historical contexts. It's important to remember that respect can coexist with disagreement, and sensitivity shouldn't overshadow the nuances of such discussions.

Yes sir another favorite of mine

People have been mentioning how annoying the recaps are every episode and I understand that it would be for people who like to beige watch but as someone who watches while doing other things such as Drawing, Projects , chores, etc. I find it as a perfect break that allows myself to focus on what I'm doing before the episode begins. I am only halfway through the series never read the webcomic but am extremely enjoying this series thus far.

Light romance but its hinted its better you watch to understand what i mean i love the series though in my opinion its worth the watch

Dont know if you started this already but this is definitely worth the watch

Have watched this series 5 times already so safe to say it's one of my comfort series