i was wondering how there were 7 voters within 5 minutes of creating the list ðŸ˜
Your votes are normal, I think people are voting to see if the list goes to feature list or not because on 6 votes list goes to feature list I voted for the same reason. But featured is occupied by a hacker I think my list also went to featured just for a minute ðŸ˜
Trying not to judge but the interviews of cast arr getting weird especially it is all about bed scenes recently. In a recent interview Park Ji Hyun said she grew up watching Song Seung Heon and at that time she was just five years old but the film they are interviewing for they literally have all kind of explicit and erotic scenes together. I don't know if other also find it weird or just I'm the weird one.
why the fuck are people still watching this show knowing lee jin wook( the main lead) is a rapist??
Why the f*ck people keep coming back to this page knowing that he was proven not guilty. If you think otherwise then you are free to skip it but stop with your misinformation, it's enough already.
I don't find Kim Soo Hyun, Byeon Woo Seok and Park Hyung Sik as handsome as other as other actors. Acting wise maybe but not looks wise especially when they are above Nam Joo Hyuk.
I don't think it's going to work American shows always try to just put characters from every community, race and minorities to build some image and ends up creating a mess.
Lol SANOYA I think we were having a healthy and reasonable argument what happened all of a sudden that you had to block me? Are you really that desperate to have the last word? Lol then go for it I don't think you even care about the case anyway you just want to get feeling of a right person while making other person seem like bad buy who couldn't even answer your argument, ATTENTION SEEKER.
Your test case isn't making much sense. Are just the things found with the missing persons blood and not any part of the body or some kind of footage? What did the witness witnessed? Just things covered in blood? Who is even the convicted person, is he proven to be a kidnapper?
I did my research and found everything reasonable. He agreed that there was no VERBAL consent which doesn't mean he forced through it. The case was already all about what he said and what she said he could have just said that there was verbal consent but he spoke truth because he knew he was not guilty. There is not proof that police officers forced her beside her claim. The judges said a rape can be possible not that thay had HIGH suspicion but also said that there also be no rape and as there is no evidence they declared him not guilty.
I don't know if other also find it weird or just I'm the weird one.
Are just the things found with the missing persons blood and not any part of the body or some kind of footage?
What did the witness witnessed? Just things covered in blood?
Who is even the convicted person, is he proven to be a kidnapper?
He agreed that there was no VERBAL consent which doesn't mean he forced through it. The case was already all about what he said and what she said he could have just said that there was verbal consent but he spoke truth because he knew he was not guilty.
There is not proof that police officers forced her beside her claim.
The judges said a rape can be possible not that thay had HIGH suspicion but also said that there also be no rape and as there is no evidence they declared him not guilty.