This is the misunderstanding in episode 11:đ„đ„đ„Even though she sees him splattering blood and saving her.…
that was before she knew about the golden lotus thing. she prob thought she was gonna die or prob wonât see him again. not sure but it was pretty stupid of her to do the dangerous thing that could kill her instead of patiently cultivating to marry the ml.
This is the misunderstanding in episode 11:đ„đ„đ„Even though she sees him splattering blood and saving her.…
actually, she jumped into that cycle because it would separate golden lotus from her body. she found out that he saved her with it so she was trying to give it back to him to keep him from getting into trouble.
but I read other comment state that the deceased family were the ones asking for money and threatening the actor…
it doesnât matter if she was dating another person or not. it doesnât change the fact that ksh dated minor ksr. please stop replying to me and this is my last reply. bye.
but I read other comment state that the deceased family were the ones asking for money and threatening the actor…
âFirstly, we want Kim Soo Hyun to acknowledge that he was dating Kim Sae Ron from the time she was a minor, as well as a public apology from him.
Second, from the agency Gold Medalist, we request an official apology for media manipulation over the past three years where they claimed that the two have never dated, and again when they stated three days ago that they have never dated too.â
these are first two statements from the family that i found in a mdl article. if you still want to defend ksh after all these proofs online from many sources outside mdl, i am sorry but go find another person. i will no longer argue with ksh defenders because i am tired. good luck and praying for you!
but I read other comment state that the deceased family were the ones asking for money and threatening the actor…
no, ksr family wanted sincere apology from ksh but he refused and denied dating minor ksr. thatâs why the family revealed photos, letters and text messages.
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
As I mentioned, if his rebuttals come with evidence, I will listen. I already listed the types of evidence he could provide. I also mention how you can find out what year these photos are taken approximately. I feel like I am repeating my self at this point. I never said her mother or aunt is a good person. All the adults in her life failed her. But the fact still stand that he groomed her.
We got the dates from kim sae ron text message. Her mother found out in 2017 but by that time, 2 years passed. I agreed that they should have done something at that time so I never defend her mother. Two people can be wrong at the same time and severity of wrong can differ.
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
But they did not show âmeta-dataâ of these photos and you already suggest that ksr side lied based on this IF.
Also, if they didnât expect her to pay them back, why not explained to her what their intention is with certified document? they never replied to her messages of begging them to give her time to repay the debt, otherwise, they should have just showed us their text. if they did call after receiving her text, there should be call log to her as well (even though, this is not concrete evidence, at least itâs something). These are such easy things to give evidence for what gold medalist are saying but they didnât. Why should I believe them when they didnât give any evidence behind what they say?
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
not everyone has money and power to sue for defamation. well if he has evidence to prove his innocence, then people will listen. not our fault for not believing him when he doesnât give any evidence or refute any evidence by other party properly.
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
â The crime of cyber defamation (ìŹìŽëČ ëȘ ìíŒììŁ) is defined in the Information and Communications Network Act, which establishes a maximum term of imprisonment of three years if the insulting information is true and seven years if it is false.â so in south korea, even if information is true, you still get punished, therefore, him suing does not mean anything. you should also know as a lawyer that those with money and power has more advantage even if they are in the wrong.
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
i am not basing my judgement from her motherâs mouth, I am basing it on text messages kim saeron sent, the pictures and letters by KSH - his fans confirmed his handwriting and he never refute it. you should search up kim soohyun mole and you will see proof that those pictures are taken before 2019 and also there is comparison of kim saeron hairstyles in one of the picture and public appearance in 2017 matching.
edit: also if these are not true, he should be addressing all these proofs one by one and give us the exact time stamp, as well as explain his side. but he didnât because he canât explain them.
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
so you will believe his statements that are contradictory but questions multiple pictures of them together when she was a minor, postcard and letter written by KSH and questionable statements by him during past interviews?
grooming does not need to have sexual relationship, the fact that he waited for her to become adult says more…
itâs not gossip. there are proofs that he groomed a minor. i donât condone people wishing death but i will also not feel sympathy if he made extreme choice. his action ultimately led a poor girl to make an extreme choice.
i also thought they would do the usual misunderstanding thing when it started but was relieved when she realized in the next scene.
Second, from the agency Gold Medalist, we request an official apology for media manipulation over the past three years where they claimed that the two have never dated, and again when they stated three days ago that they have never dated too.â
these are first two statements from the family that i found in a mdl article. if you still want to defend ksh after all these proofs online from many sources outside mdl, i am sorry but go find another person. i will no longer argue with ksh defenders because i am tired. good luck and praying for you!
We got the dates from kim sae ron text message. Her mother found out in 2017 but by that time, 2 years passed. I agreed that they should have done something at that time so I never defend her mother. Two people can be wrong at the same time and severity of wrong can differ.
Also, if they didnât expect her to pay them back, why not explained to her what their intention is with certified document? they never replied to her messages of begging them to give her time to repay the debt, otherwise, they should have just showed us their text. if they did call after receiving her text, there should be call log to her as well (even though, this is not concrete evidence, at least itâs something). These are such easy things to give evidence for what gold medalist are saying but they didnât. Why should I believe them when they didnât give any evidence behind what they say?
edit: also if these are not true, he should be addressing all these proofs one by one and give us the exact time stamp, as well as explain his side. but he didnât because he canât explain them.