In the early episodes of this show, I couldn't stand Han Mo Ne , but now I'm ready to bump off Dami for her! she's…
da mi was the light. she was a happy, bubbly person. ra hee took her away from her loving adoptive parents, and mo ne framed her to deflect blame onto an easy target and get off scot-free. they were the darkness that blocked out da mi's light
the sociopathic six's contributions to da mi's darkness are too significant to count as legally or morally irrelevant variables. we can't allow ra hee, joo ran, mo ne, jin mo, myung ji and chul woo to escape liability
this, "desire" and "couple or not" shouldn't see the light of day due to their scandalous content. i won't be…
are you okay? do you have trouble understanding the meaning of the words or passages you read? i said mainland china bans, and japan rarely acknowledges, gay content. gay existence is invisible in japanese society. any gay japanese person would tell you that japan or japanese media doesn't value diversity
my japanese friends were and are fearful to come out to their loved ones, classmates, or employers. are you denying that there's animosity toward gay people?
homophobia is a global epidemic. western and non-western mainstream productions shy away from gay content and "straightwash" their characters to appeal to the wider homophobic audience. the more conservative the production, the more "straightwashed" their characters are
"they were destined to meet each other" (episode 8, 51:04)
a provost/religious specialist warned yai's "father" that the heavens tied a red string around yai and jom. their hands hold memories of meeting and loving in a thousand other lifetimes. the "god" of this story is telling his people that, "gay isn't a sin," and his people are still compelling their children through threats into a "straight" conjugal association that goes against "god's plan"
homophobia isn't "the word of god." it's the word of people. people created a "god" in their own image and callously expressed their indifference to "human life" after birth. it's gay? they marry it off and/or make its life a living hell
marriage is to be entered into with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. ueangphueng doesn't want to be with robert the rapist. yai doesn't want to be with busabong. their "marriages" lack or will lack the free consent of one of the parties, elevating them to a crime against ueangphueng and yai. the crime is sexual assault, and the "parents" are complicit in it
people call something overrated when they refuse to comprehend anything aside from romance and cutesy stuff.
the "romance" genre is garbage 99% of the time. mysteries and thrillers are different. they are written with tremendous sweep and power. by twists and turns tender, despairing, passionate, and wry, dark genres reveal to us the dark corners behind society's calm façade
average "romance" fans don't have an appetite for those powerful and complex stories
Why is this comment still here? Does this site just not have moderators anymore?
"Why did you now?"
i'm bored?
"... have failed at every single turn"
i won two months ago
"... i mean the institution of sexual "education" in books meant for 5 year olds"
children's stories are overwhelmingly "straight." you teach children about "sexuality" and "sex acts"
"... how is it sickening when every other species on the planet can understand that"
other species don't "understand" what they are doing. they don't "reproduce" to "maintain a population." you're attributing human intentions to non-human entities
you said, "if someone dies from a shark attack ti is not murder"
the legal mental element of "murder" includes the intention to "cause grievous bodily harm." non-human entities don't "intend" to "cause grievous bodily harm." laws can't prove that non-human entities had "criminal intent" to accuse them of "murder." how could non-human entities "intend" to "maintain a population?" they don't see their children as replacements. they don't see them as anything
"... take away someone's civil liberties based on their..."
you want to take away gay people's civil liberties based on their sexuality. what stops you from doing that to poc?
"... the legal definition defines whether it was murder or not"
that's right. the definition of "murder" is the "crime of unlawfully killing a person." laws define whether or not it was "murder"
"Educational neglect is a concept found in family law. It can be defined as the failure of a parent (or legal guardian) to provide for their child’s basic educational needs. For instance, when a child reaches a certain age (usually mandated by the laws of their state), that child must be either enrolled in school, homeschooled, or given necessary special education training
According to the law, it is illegal to not send a child to school. Again, while these requirements may differ based on the state, every state has a law that requires children to attend school"
"When creating the U.S. Department of Education, the United States Congress enacted statutory law that states, “parents have the primary responsibility for the education of their children,” and that states, localities, and private institutions have the primary responsibility for supporting that parental role"
the laws of other western countries would agree that giving children the tools they need to read, write, and succeed academically is part of a parent’s job description
"... if an african american was killed by a human being, it would not have legally been murder"
you're racist, and you act like you care about poc?
laws didn't recognize poc rights. what happened to them wasn't "murder"
Why is this comment still here? Does this site just not have moderators anymore?
what's your job? you're a construction worker, garbage collector, farmer, or something? you don't sound like an important person
"Well i never asked you to pay for my house, food, electricity etc!"
children didn't ask their "parents" to meet their emotional and physical needs. their "parents" had them. they have "parental responsibility" to provide for their children
"We allow you to exist in our societies"
you didn't build this society. your ancestors did
"... if someone dies from a shark attack ti is not murder"
your "god" isn't a shark...
"... murder is defined by one human being killing another"
"murder" is the illegal "killing" of one human by another. legal abortion can't be "murder"
I mean he said he would keep quiet about it. They should have just let him live as a “single man”. In a perfect…
in a perfect world, yai would dance with jom and ask for his hand in marriage. everyone would support them. they wouldn't have to fake "marry" women to conceal their sexuality
gi woo is a worse parasite than gi jung. he's a man in his mid-20s* fooling around with a high school girl. this isn't "romance." it's sexual assault. the high school girl is a minor below the age of consent. he should have been arraigned on sexual assault charges
*gi jung, gi woo's younger sister, was 22 years old. gi woo would be 23+ years old
the sociopathic six's contributions to da mi's darkness are too significant to count as legally or morally irrelevant variables. we can't allow ra hee, joo ran, mo ne, jin mo, myung ji and chul woo to escape liability
he has a brain. he used it to entice ra hee into his trap, and she fell for it
my japanese friends were and are fearful to come out to their loved ones, classmates, or employers. are you denying that there's animosity toward gay people?
homophobia is a global epidemic. western and non-western mainstream productions shy away from gay content and "straightwash" their characters to appeal to the wider homophobic audience. the more conservative the production, the more "straightwashed" their characters are
myung joon: drop the gun, jackson!
ro hee: it's jaden
myung joon: oh, right! jason!
ro hee: jaden!
myung joon: jaden? what a confusing name (episode 8, 4:12)
myung joon: jj? what was his name again?
ro hee: jaden
myung joon: oh, right! (episode 8, 6:15)
myung joon: you should go, i'll take jackson (episode 8, 17:06)
a provost/religious specialist warned yai's "father" that the heavens tied a red string around yai and jom. their hands hold memories of meeting and loving in a thousand other lifetimes. the "god" of this story is telling his people that, "gay isn't a sin," and his people are still compelling their children through threats into a "straight" conjugal association that goes against "god's plan"
homophobia isn't "the word of god." it's the word of people. people created a "god" in their own image and callously expressed their indifference to "human life" after birth. it's gay? they marry it off and/or make its life a living hell
marriage is to be entered into with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. ueangphueng doesn't want to be with robert the rapist. yai doesn't want to be with busabong. their "marriages" lack or will lack the free consent of one of the parties, elevating them to a crime against ueangphueng and yai. the crime is sexual assault, and the "parents" are complicit in it
average "romance" fans don't have an appetite for those powerful and complex stories
i'm bored?
"... have failed at every single turn"
i won two months ago
"... i mean the institution of sexual "education" in books meant for 5 year olds"
children's stories are overwhelmingly "straight." you teach children about "sexuality" and "sex acts"
"... how is it sickening when every other species on the planet can understand that"
other species don't "understand" what they are doing. they don't "reproduce" to "maintain a population." you're attributing human intentions to non-human entities
you said, "if someone dies from a shark attack ti is not murder"
the legal mental element of "murder" includes the intention to "cause grievous bodily harm." non-human entities don't "intend" to "cause grievous bodily harm." laws can't prove that non-human entities had "criminal intent" to accuse them of "murder." how could non-human entities "intend" to "maintain a population?" they don't see their children as replacements. they don't see them as anything
"... take away someone's civil liberties based on their..."
you want to take away gay people's civil liberties based on their sexuality. what stops you from doing that to poc?
"... the legal definition defines whether it was murder or not"
that's right. the definition of "murder" is the "crime of unlawfully killing a person." laws define whether or not it was "murder"
"It does not matter if you don't ask, you use it"
we are using it against you
"... something your kind can only do through grooming and again leeching off of what your kind cannot physically do"
you mean adopting the children you "straight" identifying people neglected or abandoned?
"... and provide replacements to maintain it"
children aren't replacements. it's sickening that humanity sees them that way
"... you don't even need to legally enroll your kids into school"
you do: https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/educational-neglect.html
"Educational neglect is a concept found in family law. It can be defined as the failure of a parent (or legal guardian) to provide for their child’s basic educational needs. For instance, when a child reaches a certain age (usually mandated by the laws of their state), that child must be either enrolled in school, homeschooled, or given necessary special education training
According to the law, it is illegal to not send a child to school. Again, while these requirements may differ based on the state, every state has a law that requires children to attend school"
https://thejusticefoundation.org/info/parental-rights/
"When creating the U.S. Department of Education, the United States Congress enacted statutory law that states, “parents have the primary responsibility for the education of their children,” and that states, localities, and private institutions have the primary responsibility for supporting that parental role"
the laws of other western countries would agree that giving children the tools they need to read, write, and succeed academically is part of a parent’s job description
"... if an african american was killed by a human being, it would not have legally been murder"
you're racist, and you act like you care about poc?
laws didn't recognize poc rights. what happened to them wasn't "murder"
"Well i never asked you to pay for my house, food, electricity etc!"
children didn't ask their "parents" to meet their emotional and physical needs. their "parents" had them. they have "parental responsibility" to provide for their children
"We allow you to exist in our societies"
you didn't build this society. your ancestors did
"... if someone dies from a shark attack ti is not murder"
your "god" isn't a shark...
"... murder is defined by one human being killing another"
"murder" is the illegal "killing" of one human by another. legal abortion can't be "murder"
"She's a high schooler and these men are several years older than her"
this isn't "romance." it's sexual assault. the high school girl is a minor. she can't legally consent to sexual activity!
*gi jung, gi woo's younger sister, was 22 years old. gi woo would be 23+ years old
you know what's more ridiculous? people expecting to see every boy with a girl, every man with a woman
why are you shaming anti-romantic opinions? that's okay, and shaming "romance" or "cutesy stuff" isn't?