Mods what are you doing, not taking the trash out *slurps tea*
mods didn't delete the homophobic comments i reported on this website. refer to the "kill boksoon" and "uncanny counter season 2" comment sections. why would they delete my comments? i didn't call you trash. i criticized a/b/o, and expressed my dislike. shouldn't your offensive comment be taken out?
a/b/o is misogynistic. the fandom is uncomfortable with the fact that only women can get pregnant, that only men…
ironically, many "trans" identifying people accuse a/b/o of "transphobia." they believe, "it's transphobic that a cis man gets pregnant when you could have imagined a trans man"
Im so confused in why we are hating on omegaverse?Is this rooted in internalized misogyny or what.
a/b/o is misogynistic. the fandom is uncomfortable with the fact that only women can get pregnant, that only men can impregnate, or that omegas are women because they can get pregnant. they fetishize pregnancy, project their fetishes onto the gay community, and believe a "man-identifying" humanoid alien literally shooting babies out of its ass is a better mother than women have been
it's not even the weirdest thing out there, tbh. 😅
it is one of the weirdest, craziest, cringiest things out there. furries wouldn't be able to keep up with the a/b/o fandom's cringe, not by a long shot
this is happening (please don't), because "omegaverse/mpreg" isn't bl or gay. it's "straight" with extra steps.…
"... so it's not entirely straight thing with extra step"
it is ...
"... and the rape thing is huge on bl in genral"
did i say that's not toxic? i said "omegaverse" is more toxic
dependency and unhealthy power dynamics are well-established adverse effects of pheromones and heat. like incapacitating drugs, they deprive alphas and omegas of their free will, and produce withdrawal symptoms upon abrupt discontinuation of "mating"
alpha/omega interactions are always rapey. they can't "lean to good relationships"
Listen,it's ok to not like anything and there's one solution to it not getting involved with it,You can't just…
"... yeah it might be homophobic or kinky or even a fetish ,so what"
it's okay to be homophobic? why isn't it okay to be "straightphobic?"
what if i were "straightphobic?" so what? the gay community has faced severe and systematic mistreatment at the hands of "straight" identifying people. they and their "straight" lifestyle aren't eligible for redemption. a/b/o was the final nail in the coffin
respect is a privilege granted based on one's character and conduct. i won't give it freely
i regard a/b/o creators, actors, and consumers as having forfeited all respect. you haven't given me a reason to roll out the red carpet for you
gay relationships are erased from cultural, historical, and fictional narratives. a/b/o, a "straight" trope disguised as a bl trope, raises serious moral questions. it's not "straightphobic" to invest efforts in combating a/b/o's woke gay erasure
"They can't top rapes"
a/b/o is generally rapey and significantly worse than cheating
just when I thought this show couldn't get better, the copycat comes in saying "he's like a quote generator, how…
don't forget episode 4 where joon hyuk (kang ok) said, "i'll be frank, i like the vigilante. there's no reason. i just like him"
the honesty of his words is everything i'd want in a declaration of love. joon hyuk (kang ok) and joo hyuk (ji yong) are pieces of a puzzle that fit together. i ship
I also end up thinking about the moral values of it. Should the Vigilante be punished for his killings? I mean,…
"If we support the Vigilante, we are basically supporting murder"
"murder" is defined as "the unlawful killing of one person by another"
something unlawful isn't necessarily immoral. the belief that people have fundamental rights to life, liberty, etc, that "every human life is sacred," is embedded in culturally and historically specific western moral language-games. it doesn't feature in the moral language-games played by people at other times and places
the popular opinion isn't that "killing a person is always immoral." there are exceptions (e.g. self-defense). why wouldn't "killing" the criminals who escaped prison be an exception? they didn't compensate the survivors or the wider public
the law doesn't aspire to provide a balance more favorable to the survivors. shorter sentences don't reduce crime or assuage the wounded feelings and bodies of survivors. aren't law enforcement officials committing a crime against the public? why would anyone obey or respect their immoral law?
"... which actually isn't all much better than the original ones in my opinion"
it's his thought that counts
"the one who broke the law is protected by it. the one who obeyed the law isn't protected by it. some crimes should be punished by crimes" ― ji yong, episode 3
a wise man once said, "if only the time spent on protecting the judicial system was spent on protecting the victims, it wouldn't have come to this" ― ji yong, episode 3
law enforcement officials shouldn't blame the vigilante. they didn't foster public safety. someone had to do their job
vigilantism amounts not to a wholesale abandonment of the state’s enforcement of law, but rather to a reimagining of the responsibilities of that enforcement. ji yong wished for a state that prosecutes and punishes criminals fairly. his heart is in the right place
I would rather someone take out a rapist or pedophile.
many survivors of rape are suicidal. they don't want to be given "a chance at life again," and we can't tell them how to feel about their situation. it's not our place
if the survivors developed severe post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, the punishment should be as severe as "murder"
it is that serious. it's ruining the bl genre
"adam ruins everything" addressed the myth: https://youtu.be/YTyQgwVvYyc?si=eKVeQ87XKShzUJEo
do other animals live by the system? that's a reason to avoid a/b/o. it's bestiality
don't be so open (broad?)-minded that your brains fall out
it is ...
"... and the rape thing is huge on bl in genral"
did i say that's not toxic? i said "omegaverse" is more toxic
dependency and unhealthy power dynamics are well-established adverse effects of pheromones and heat. like incapacitating drugs, they deprive alphas and omegas of their free will, and produce withdrawal symptoms upon abrupt discontinuation of "mating"
alpha/omega interactions are always rapey. they can't "lean to good relationships"
it's okay to be homophobic? why isn't it okay to be "straightphobic?"
what if i were "straightphobic?" so what? the gay community has faced severe and systematic mistreatment at the hands of "straight" identifying people. they and their "straight" lifestyle aren't eligible for redemption. a/b/o was the final nail in the coffin
respect is a privilege granted based on one's character and conduct. i won't give it freely
i regard a/b/o creators, actors, and consumers as having forfeited all respect. you haven't given me a reason to roll out the red carpet for you
gay relationships are erased from cultural, historical, and fictional narratives. a/b/o, a "straight" trope disguised as a bl trope, raises serious moral questions. it's not "straightphobic" to invest efforts in combating a/b/o's woke gay erasure
"They can't top rapes"
a/b/o is generally rapey and significantly worse than cheating
the honesty of his words is everything i'd want in a declaration of love. joon hyuk (kang ok) and joo hyuk (ji yong) are pieces of a puzzle that fit together. i ship
"murder" is defined as "the unlawful killing of one person by another"
something unlawful isn't necessarily immoral. the belief that people have fundamental rights to life, liberty, etc, that "every human life is sacred," is embedded in culturally and historically specific western moral language-games. it doesn't feature in the moral language-games played by people at other times and places
the popular opinion isn't that "killing a person is always immoral." there are exceptions (e.g. self-defense). why wouldn't "killing" the criminals who escaped prison be an exception? they didn't compensate the survivors or the wider public
the law doesn't aspire to provide a balance more favorable to the survivors. shorter sentences don't reduce crime or assuage the wounded feelings and bodies of survivors. aren't law enforcement officials committing a crime against the public? why would anyone obey or respect their immoral law?
"... which actually isn't all much better than the original ones in my opinion"
it's his thought that counts
"the one who broke the law is protected by it. the one who obeyed the law isn't protected by it. some crimes should be punished by crimes"
― ji yong, episode 3
― ji yong, episode 3
law enforcement officials shouldn't blame the vigilante. they didn't foster public safety. someone had to do their job
vigilantism amounts not to a wholesale abandonment of the state’s enforcement of law, but rather to a reimagining of the responsibilities of that enforcement. ji yong wished for a state that prosecutes and punishes criminals fairly. his heart is in the right place
if the survivors developed severe post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, the punishment should be as severe as "murder"