Anonymous

Again, just because there are worse characters doesn't mean he's not still bad and that we should just brush off what he did. I don't know why people seem to think they're obligated to choose one to root for.

It wasn't genuine. Daon initiated it while drunk and was so out of his mind that he said someone else's name. We don't know what could have happened if he hadn't said that out loud.

Just because one isn't as bad as another doesn't mean he's not still bad. They can all be considered problematic.

No, it has nothing to do with who's playing the character. Nothing I've said has ever indicated that it does. But he did take advantage of a drunk person because he reciprocated something that couldn't be considered consensual due to the other person's state of mind. The character is clearly obsessed with Daon but viewers seem to find it cute rather than creepy.

I don't know how you could assume I'm a child when most of the other comments here sound like they're written by actual children or teenagers. This show was definitely made for a younger audience since it's giving cheesy teen drama vibes. People who lack the ability to think critically will eat up anything, apparently.

I don't care for any of the characters since we haven't been given any reasons to like them. I mean, Seonghyeon doesn't even know why he likes Daon, lol. It just seems like I'm coming after Seonghyeon since I'm shocked at how many people are acting like he's an angel.

Whether it's fictional or not, it's disturbing how many people are defending that type of behavior. It says a lot about their morality and what they must be like in real life.

Did you not read my whole comment? That is not what I said.

I'm watching it for one of the actors. Also, if I'm ever asked why I don't like it, then I can't be told I don't know what I'm talking about if I've actually seen it.

If you are on his side, I don't trust you. He's a shallow, obsessive person who takes advantage of drunk people.

It is a type of laughing emoji. It's obviously someone giggling with their hand over their mouth.

As an example, I saw the movie Mufasa and it has great visuals but I would never call it "good" due to the multitude of plot issues. When judging something, all aspects should be considered. And again, people have admitted that this drama makes no sense and yet they still think highly of it. A plot can't be both confusing and good at the same time. That's a contradiction.

I haven't seen anyone recognizing the humanity of either the characters or the actors. Everyone just wants to talk about their appearances and see them get physical with each other no matter how bad the plot is. And then they say the show is one of the best ever and give it a high rating even though it doesn't make any sense and they know it doesn't.

In other words, you believe it's fine to objectify people for entertainment. That's quite a regressive way to think.

You used laughing emojis.

Not funny.

I haven't actually seen anyone discussing the flaws in any meaningful way. Because even the people who admit that it's confusing have still said they like it just because they think the cinematography is nice and the actors are good-looking. Everyone's as shallow as the characters in the story, it seems.

I disagree, because they would be able to recognize that abuse isn't love.

It technically doesn't have to have a happy ending. It would actually be more interesting if the plot twist was that no one ended up together. And then maybe it could teach a meaningful lesson to the audience.

I'm obviously not talking about supernatural or fantasy concepts. This drama is clearly meant to take place in the real world. But no matter the setting, the characters are still way too over-the-top as if this is a parody of a drama rather than a serious drama.

"Barge in" as if I don't have just as much of a right to be here as everyone else? People have admitted that the drama is confusing and braincell-damaging, so is it that shocking that I showed up and criticized it? Are only positive opinions allowed? If so, then there shouldn't even be an option to give things low ratings.

I think you missed my point somehow.