Details
- Last Online: 54 seconds ago
- Gender: Female
- Location: Brussels, Belgium đ
- Contribution Points: 38 LV1
- Birthday: January 04
- Roles: VIP
- Join Date: January 30, 2023
- Awards Received:
17
40
3
1
1
7
2
1
17
40
3
1
1
7
2
1
Thank you, sir. May you rest in peace đđť
Itâs true that bullying can appear more visible or "imminent" in certain countries, especially when social structures, expectations, or pressures create environments where competition, hierarchy, or conformity are very strong. Social values, the way respect is taught, and the emphasis placed on success can definitely influence how young people interact and how conflicts develop.
At the same time, personal experiences with bullying vary enormously from one school, region or generation to another. Some people go through their entire education without ever witnessing it, while others encounter it early and often, even within the same country or school system.
For example, I personally experienced bullying several times during my school years in a European environment that was 95% caucasian (like me). So experiences can differ widely, even in places that might seem âsafeâ or familiar.
Because of this, itâs difficult to draw broad conclusions about entire cultures based only on individual cases, even though those cases are meaningful.
I agree that longâterm social values shape behaviour, and that unhealthy competition, rigid hierarchies or pressure to âget aheadâ can contribute to harmful dynamics. But these mechanisms exist in many places, not just in a few countries. Different societies simply express them in different ways; some more publicly, some more quietly, some more dramatically amplified by media.
In the end, bullying isnât a ânational traitâ. Itâs a complex human issue influenced by social norms, family structures, education systems, media, and generational changes. The roots can be cultural, psychological, structural, societal⌠often a mix of all of these.
And like you said, it takes years of shaping values (good or bad) to create the environment young people grow up in.
But if it were true, it could quite possibly have influenced or helped things for veteran actor Lee Kyungâyoung, indeed. đ
Too bad Ji Soo canât really benefit from it.
School violence cases in Korea get a lot of media attention, and the Ji Soo case brought the topic back into the spotlight.
But I donât think itâs accurate to say that Korean schools are âfull of antisocials and bullies.â The issue exists, yes, but itâs not representative of the entire system.
And itâs important to remember that these problems arenât unique to one country or culture. Bullying and social pressure exist everywhere, though they take different forms.
Several factors help explain why bullying cases in Korea seem so visible or common, and why they can feel unfamiliar/surprising or hard to fully understand for many of us in Western countries:
⢠Strong academic pressure and competition
⢠Group dynamics and conformity norms
⢠Hierarchical social structure
⢠Media amplification (K-dramas, Korean & Int'l social media)
⢠Public shaming culture
These elements can make certain situations feel harsher or more dramatic from an outside perspective. But again, no country is exempt from these issues; theyâre just expressed differently depending on social norms and media practices.
As for the entertainment industry, itâs true that Korea has a very hierarchical and reputationâdriven system. Power imbalances, agency control, and public opinion can play a huge role in an actorâs career. But this isnât unique to Korea either. Industries built on visibility, branding, and public image often have similar dynamics worldwide.
What can make the Korean case feel more intense is the combination of:
⢠strong seniority culture,
⢠tight agency contracts,
⢠extremely fast public reactions on social networks,
⢠and a media environment that amplifies scandals very quickly.
So yes, the Ji Soo case was messy and very painful, but I wouldnât say it âprovesâ anything about an entire culture or industry.
Itâs more a reminder that no system is perfect, and that individuals can be harmed by rumors, power imbalances, or public opinion anywhere in the world.
Koreaâs issues are not unique, sadly. Theyâre just more publicly exposed and culturally handled in a very different way.
I genuinely enjoyed your review. Your enthusiasm and analysis are great. Your effort to stay spoilerâfree was clear, and I appreciated it.
All good, Kes! đ
I just wanted to mention something very gently: for me, a few parts of the review still felt a bit spoilerâish. Not in a âplot revealâ way, of course, but more in terms of character development and how the narrative unfolds.
For example, you talk about Ji Hyunâs personal evolution, her longâterm relationship, and Si Wooâs backstory being stretched until the end of the show. These arenât explicit spoilers, but they do reveal the direction the story takes and how certain mysteries or dynamics are handled. Some MDLers prefer discovering those elements on their own, so I thought Iâd let you know.đ
Friendly reminder: don't forget to use the Spoiler Tag đ
PS: don't forget to use the Spoiler Tag! đ
What I meant is that, in South Korean public perception, some offenses are seen as âprivate wrongdoingâ (something terrible but viewed as an individual matter, often including sexual crimes), while school violence is treated as a public moral failure tied to youth and education.
So the social reaction ends up being very different, even if legally both are crimes.
âPersonal crimeâ isnât a legal term. I simply used it to describe how SK public opinion tends to separate scandals. I probably should have used âPRIVATE wrongdoingâ (instead of âPERSONAL crimeâ) from the start. It would have been clearer.
Actor Lee Kyungâyoung was actually convicted in 2002 for sexual offenses involving a minor, but he returned to acting after only 2 years.
His comeback was possible for several reasons:
- he was already an established veteran actor,
- he didnât rely on a âpureâ, romantic or youthâoriented public image,
- he mostly played authority figures or villains (roles that donât require moral innocence), and the industry has a strong demand for older male actors in those parts.
- his case was also perceived as a âpersonal crimeâ rather than a moral failing tied to youth or education; which makes a big difference in South Koreaâs public perception.
This cultural dynamic is difficult to understand (and accept) from a Western perspective, where the hierarchy of moral gravity is very different. But in South Korea, it strongly shapes how scandals are handled and how careers recover.
Thatâs why Ji Sooâs situation is treated much more harshly socially, despite the lack of any legal conviction. Sadly.
- The accusations against Ji Soo were never officially recognized as true by any court.
- There was no criminal conviction, no civil ruling confirming the allegations, and no legal decision stating that the claims of school violence were proven.
- The only judicial outcome was that the people who posted the accusations were acquitted of defamation â which simply means the court didnât consider their statements to be punishably false, not that Ji Sooâs guilt was legally established.
- Everything else (his apology, the controversy, the end of his contract, and the impact on his career) came from public and industry reaction, not from a legal confirmation of any wrongdoing.
In short:
đ legally, he was never found guilty;
đ socially and in the media, he was treated as if he were.
Because Korean society places a very strong emphasis on education, school violence is viewed almost as a moral offense. Even when accusations are unproven, resolved, or withdrawn, the label tends to stick and public perception can linger for a very long time.
Thatâs why a full comeback in the Korean entertainment industry is very unlikely for now; even though he has officially no legal dispute, conviction or ongoing conflict.
This also explains why Ji Soo hasnât returned to Korean projects, left (had to leave) his previous agency, and is now rebuilding his career abroad.
Btw, I started watching The East Palace. Still on episode 1.
I noticed your 5/10 đŻ
Without spoiling anything, could you tell me what didnât work for you? I'm curious.
âAsk your commanderâ was meant as a playful reference to military rules: since Kwak Dong Yeon is soon to be enlisted, the only (but unfortunately impossible) way to meet him would be to "ask someone higherâranked" in the army for permission.
The humor comes from the fact that's something nobody could actually ask in real life. Itâs the absurdity of the idea that makes the joke particularly funny (in my personal opinion).
Just to clarify: we weren't talking about your wish to meet him. Your first -very sweet and innocent- comment simply gave LucyL an opportunity to make her little military joke, that's all.
And of course thereâs nothing strange about wanting to meet Kwak Dong Yeon. Youâll just have to wait until he finishes his military service. Or hurry quite a bit before his enlistment. đ