The small argument in the comments below is kind of a donut and I just don't like seeing unfair things. I don't want to necroreply so I'll just put it here. The person technically still attacked him. It's wrong for you to say to emphasize you didn't attack him anyway when you used sarcasm ("Michael") to mock them. You were being obnoxious. If you left it at the simple statement, then your counterargument is true.
I'm on neither side but my side, I disagree that the comments below the original commenter were haters, but I also disagree that you supposedly didn't attack him in anyway. I was even confused at first by what they meant by 'haters' because I didn't see any and there were like one or two comments that are I guess, barely close, but they are just valid criticisms.
I just visited this page because I remembered this drama exists and then I read the comments out of curiosity. I also remembered this because I'm thinking of finally actually being committed to learning the language. I'm glad this drama exists. I've learned of this a few years ago, I just didn't watch it yet because I wasn't that - that interested despite my desires of being fluent in the language.
It was a nice watch. This is the first 16-episode kdrama I've finished in several years. Well that's because I barely ever watch kdramas because the plots aren't often as interesting or unique like jdramas are. Also because somehow, when I do find one interesting, the plot just becomes boring or annoying (uses too many common tropes, goal is achieved already, etc.) midway or near the end. If anything, I find myself asking, how could even the lawyer be in love with the heroine? I mean, the drama didn't really show any impactful or actual positive or healthy things the heroine did towards him... She is a psychopath, but still, it just had me thinking. I guess some of those ramyeon dinners was his romantic bonding time to her. And also that she helped him with his illness by showing him the reality of some cruelty that cannot be brought to law without any illegal intervention ; i guess?
I love the ending, I just don't like that the director was too playful with the last scene ; the dialogues. Anyway, this was a chef's kiss for me, I am now going to look for interesting dramas that Na-sa and Ringo are involved in
ahhh she looks interesting, and the guy too. The plot too isn't too typical. I wonder if there's going to be slight romance, uauauauaauua hoping for subs.
>be frowned upon >didnt get criticise at all.You do want 150 episodes of people meddling with someone else life,…
Yes immersion can be positively affected by less realism, but what happened is not the same with logic - it has to happen naturally, it has to make sense on why such happened.
Every show can be criticized for its logic, it doesn't have to suppose to be an actual case of reality. Expecting negative consequences for them being as 'siblings' since they were kids isn't genre-conditioned expectations because it actually exists in real life, whether from the internet or from close-minded individuals in real life.
Part of the comment wasn't ignoring but observing the effectiveness of the narrative and intent. Like they said, one of the main plot points was that they shouldn't have that kind of romance, but no one wrinkled their noses and mouths for it. The show was supposed to show that their romance was socially a bad thing, but it didn't show anyone that negatively cared on that aspect. That's not ignoring, that's stating one of the weaknesses of the 'narrative economy and intent'.
Their comment's section didn't need to curve this way. I was just countering you invalidating their skepticism with a rhetorical question that's based on preference and not from the comment's main point of logic. The drama doesn't have to be an asadora long, it can still be the usual jdrama length but it can highlight the glares of society in several scenes or in the middle of one or two episodes.
oh I thought two of my favorite actors (Nanao and Tanihara) were the focus because of the cast order here, but bruh I'm disappointed since it looks like according to the summary, Chikado and Junpei are.
>be frowned upon >didnt get criticise at all.You do want 150 episodes of people meddling with someone else life,…
What do you even mean. The aspect of realism and logic which affects the audience's immersion is being doubted here. There's nothing wrong with being disappointed on that if with reason.
I wish they could have done a sequel when volume two was released, then another when the last volume (3) was publicized during 2017, was released. I mtl'ed the reviews on the last volume, and Momoko and Sho ended up together. I love the going back on time criminal reveal thing but I would have loved the drama more if it showed the two really gravitating towards each other.
I have never actually watched the drama since the plot is uninteresting to me as it's a typical shoujo manga plot. But it's nice to read the comments again praising Oikawa Mitsuhiro's appeal, he really has that mature and serious look like the 4th prince in Scarlet Heart---sadly for me, I don't remember him being in any romcoms as the main lead or endgame.
What is Oikawa Mitsuhiro's role here? I learned of this drama a while back while I was looking for any romcoms he could be in but I just knew that the female lead would be subtly 'shipped' with your everyday ikemen
Can't ever complete this series. I watched the very first episode and I found the female lead annoying and her visuals not really matching the character's personality for me. I mean, I thought it was too far off. Also high necks don't really suit her.
There is one question I have though, I hope someone could answer. Who in the end was running those message in a bottles? In episode 8, what did the last message shown mean?
Just finished it. I think it's an unsatisfying watch to those who've never watched Twin Peaks I haven't and I was left puzzled and much saddened by the ending. More of that feeling is felt as you try to understand what was going on as you read more comments with 90% of first-hand explanations that it was similar to Twin Peaks.
It was a fun watch and this is the first drama I've ever watched that revolved on only one case. I only watch episodic dramas and this really left me impatient near the ending and realize that part of me about this genre. Still, it was an engaging watch and I watched it for the plot not for the artists---though I was only a bit interested initially since it was one case and not much lighthearted. I watched it in the end because I didn't have much to watch as others I'm more interested in either don't have subs or restricted to members only.
Again, I'm left discontent by the ending. I really was so I'm reiterating it again :(. Gosh I really wish I could just headcannon the opposite but facts are stronger to me.
Edit: I forgot to mention although I enjoyed it mostly, it was a struggle to watch. Most episodes I found had delayed subtitles and delayed audio. So at times, most often, I just turned off the audio, only putting it back up if I wanted to hear how the actors spoke their dialogues.
I'm currently half-in in the movie but I've been starting to find it uninteresting since I watched it from an AI narrated clip from another 'platform' beforehand and some top comments were negative on the female lead. I'm kind of saddened, those comments really made me mindful of her forceful behavior. There were times where she was like sure let's not do that, but then they include another scene where she forces something. I just keep interpreting that her actions were made with mostly selfish intentions and that's part of what irks me---making me lose interest in the movie. Additionally, I'd believe it if someone went to the other side just because of getting hit by 'pigeon dung'. I know this was made more than ten years ago, but still, I would just have thought that person was probably very allergic to 'pigeon dung' and not call the 'witness' a liar.
I found some parts funny but I just really don't like most of the female lead's selfishness and foolishness.
I'm on neither side but my side, I disagree that the comments below the original commenter were haters, but I also disagree that you supposedly didn't attack him in anyway. I was even confused at first by what they meant by 'haters' because I didn't see any and there were like one or two comments that are I guess, barely close, but they are just valid criticisms.
I just visited this page because I remembered this drama exists and then I read the comments out of curiosity. I also remembered this because I'm thinking of finally actually being committed to learning the language. I'm glad this drama exists. I've learned of this a few years ago, I just didn't watch it yet because I wasn't that - that interested despite my desires of being fluent in the language.
I love the ending, I just don't like that the director was too playful with the last scene ; the dialogues. Anyway, this was a chef's kiss for me, I am now going to look for interesting dramas that Na-sa and Ringo are involved in
Every show can be criticized for its logic, it doesn't have to suppose to be an actual case of reality. Expecting negative consequences for them being as 'siblings' since they were kids isn't genre-conditioned expectations because it actually exists in real life, whether from the internet or from close-minded individuals in real life.
Part of the comment wasn't ignoring but observing the effectiveness of the narrative and intent. Like they said, one of the main plot points was that they shouldn't have that kind of romance, but no one wrinkled their noses and mouths for it. The show was supposed to show that their romance was socially a bad thing, but it didn't show anyone that negatively cared on that aspect. That's not ignoring, that's stating one of the weaknesses of the 'narrative economy and intent'.
Their comment's section didn't need to curve this way. I was just countering you invalidating their skepticism with a rhetorical question that's based on preference and not from the comment's main point of logic. The drama doesn't have to be an asadora long, it can still be the usual jdrama length but it can highlight the glares of society in several scenes or in the middle of one or two episodes.
I haven't and I was left puzzled and much saddened by the ending. More of that feeling is felt as you try to understand what was going on as you read more comments with 90% of first-hand explanations that it was similar to Twin Peaks.
It was a fun watch and this is the first drama I've ever watched that revolved on only one case. I only watch episodic dramas and this really left me impatient near the ending and realize that part of me about this genre. Still, it was an engaging watch and I watched it for the plot not for the artists---though I was only a bit interested initially since it was one case and not much lighthearted. I watched it in the end because I didn't have much to watch as others I'm more interested in either don't have subs or restricted to members only.
Again, I'm left discontent by the ending. I really was so I'm reiterating it again :(. Gosh I really wish I could just headcannon the opposite but facts are stronger to me.
Edit: I forgot to mention although I enjoyed it mostly, it was a struggle to watch. Most episodes I found had delayed subtitles and delayed audio. So at times, most often, I just turned off the audio, only putting it back up if I wanted to hear how the actors spoke their dialogues.
I found some parts funny but I just really don't like most of the female lead's selfishness and foolishness.