atom951

I can't see Kim Ji-won as Doctor X.
Itashimasen.

That's called toxic positivity, what you said there. It matters.

If he was innocent he'd take questions and answer them diligently.
Imagine how cringe worthy it would be to see him try to answer just one of these.
If he goes ahead with his lawsuit against the family, maybe he'll have to face questions like these in court:
"What stopped you attending Sae-ron's funeral?"
"Why did you ignore her text messages?"
"Why did you harass her like a loan shark?"
"Were you afraid Sae-ron would talk about you after she leaked the photo?"
"Do you feel any responsibility for the plight of Kim Sae-ron?"
"Can you see why people might find your words and actions egregious?"
"Have you or your associates ever coordinated a hate campaign in the media?"
"What's your relationship to Kwak Tae-young?"
"What's your relationship to Lee Jin-ho?"
"What's your involvement in business affairs at Gold Medalist?"
"Can you think of anyone who would benefit from the permanent silencing of Sae-ron?"
"Why do you need Korea's most expensive law firm?"
"What's your history with Garosero Research Institute?"
"What's the age of the youngest girl you've been sexually attracted to?"
"Have you ever given a straight answer to a straight question?"

What is the literal evidence he produced?

I was a drama fan, now I'm fully consumed by this story. I'm glad MDL is covering it. Do you believe in free speech btw?

Bot

Bot

I like where you're going with this, is that true? Here's a list of associated cases to possible persons of interest where scandals were at the epicentre...

Hara (deceased)
Sulli (deceased)
Garosero journalist (deceased)
Ye-ji (survivor)
Sae-ron (deceased)
Sulli's brother (missing/in-hiding?)
...?

This is just a theory using names associated with this case from media outlets. It's worth noting that everyone has something to hide, not everyone's dirty laundry goes out to air in public.

Thanks for that. Yes, DNA results can be altered by bribing lab technicians. Digital footprints can be modified, so can meta data. Seems like they specialise in that field, no wonder his disgusting law firm knows them.

It does. I can talk to an AI if I wanted to, all day. The assumption is we're sharing what's in our own minds.

Dear users, I'm sorry for this distraction, but feel the need to speak up.

A user called YourLeftBooby has blocked me for noticing the following AI attributes to his comments:
Immediate upvotes.
Immediate replies to responders.
Supported by other users with very similar user-name and writing styles.
AI traits - anyone that's chatted to an AI knows it.

Here's an AI analysis of one haughty paragraph added by user YourLeftBooby, verbatim:
Analyzing the comment for traits of narcissism and sociopathy involves looking for specific characteristics associated with these personality traits.

### Narcissism:
1. **Self-Importance**: The commenter expresses a sense of superiority by suggesting that their well-structured argument is not being appreciated and that others should "raise their standards." This indicates a belief that their contributions are more valuable than those of others.

2. **Need for Validation**: The mention of "I appreciate the compliments" suggests a desire for recognition and validation from others, which is a common trait in narcissistic individuals.

3. **Lack of Empathy**: The comment implies that the reactions of others (questioning whether the comment is AI-generated) are not valid or worthy of consideration. This can indicate a lack of empathy for the perspectives of others.

### Sociopathy:
1. **Dismissiveness**: The comment shows a dismissive attitude towards others' opinions and reactions, suggesting a lack of concern for how others feel about the conversation. This can be indicative of sociopathic traits, where the individual may not fully consider the emotional responses of others.

2. **Manipulative Language**: The phrase "if that makes it sound ‘too structured’ for you, maybe the problem isn’t my writing" can be seen as a way to deflect criticism and manipulate the conversation to focus on the perceived shortcomings of others rather than addressing the content of the discussion.

3. **Lack of Genuine Connection**: The focus on the structure and formality of the argument rather than the content or emotional aspects of the discussion may suggest a disconnection from the social and emotional nuances of communication, which can be a trait associated with sociopathy.

### Conclusion:
The comment exhibits some traits associated with both narcissism and sociopathy, such as a sense of superiority, a need for validation, dismissiveness towards others, and a lack of empathy. However, it's important to note that a single comment cannot definitively diagnose someone with a personality disorder. These traits can exist on a spectrum and may not necessarily indicate a clinical condition.

That's true, good points - I was also pointing to the way both Ye-ji and Sae-ron got no support when their scandals blew up. It's alleged that GM was behind the spread of the scandals. It released single, terse statements such as "this is her private life and we will not comment". Big difference when KSH is the subject.
His silence during Sulli's bullying was also deafening, almost as if he wanted it to continue.

I think they are bot accounts, not worth engaging.
They respond too quickly.
Look at the number of similar styles of user names, wordings, upvote counts and timings of upvotes. It's all generic AI: "respond to this comment from mydramalist.com in the style of a narcissist: [comment here]".

This is AI generated, just ask any AI to "Describe clinical narcissism" etc. word it however you want, it will understand.
15 votes for the AI.
Don't get me wrong, it's truly amazing, but does it make for good comment?

The deceased.

Maybe the AI thinks it's learnt enough from humans, there won't be original thought for much longer.

At the moment AI doesn't understand irony, humour or art. Those human novelties will also die off. I wonder if it's because AI was programmed to be woke though. Woke people (narcissists) don't get humour either.

That was a turgid statement, here's my interpretation.

Kim Soo-hyun: "It has been said that something true is true but not untrue or contain no truth either, not that the untruths are not untrue they are not truthful enough to be true and therefore I cannot say it is not untrue when I don't not know what I'm not saying. It's not untrue to say it's okay not to be not untrue. It's not okay not to be not okay.

Kim Soo-hyun is sorry that you're hurting Kim Soo-hyun's supporters, Kim Soo-hyun is not hurting anyone, it's the bereaved family - what was their name again? Oh who cares, whatever.

Kim Soo-hyun is not presenting any concrete evidence that will exonerate me (err... I mean 'him') today, but as soon as the forensic team has manufactured it, bribes paid, threats issued, I'll be totally innocent, and I'll need my ₩12bn."

It's funny how GM couldn't lift a finger to support its other artists that got into scandals. This time it's almost daily statements and a huge law firm - I guess it wouldn't make sense to debunk scandals that maybe they themselves had planted and cultivated.

Totally. Good one.

He's doing the anguished cry from his repertoire. It was shit, that's how we know he's acting.

Sounded rude to me.