Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: 14 minutes ago
  • Gender: Male
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 24 LV1
  • Birthday: December 04
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: March 15, 2012
  • Awards Received: Finger Heart Award2 Flower Award1 Coin Gift Award1 Clap Clap Clap Award1
Replying to 9999775 May 6, 2025
I was predicting Kim Taeri to win Best Actress and IU to win Daesang, since Daesang is more of a cultural impact…
Really? So, you think Baeksang is not a cheating Award? Did you watch them in 2024? Like I said above, they gave 3 different Daesang that year in the TV Show category: 1 for a Variety "actor", Jaesuk, 1 for "Moving" and 1 for two cinematographers of a documentary!
1 1
Replying to 9999775 May 6, 2025
I was predicting Kim Taeri to win Best Actress and IU to win Daesang, since Daesang is more of a cultural impact…
Yes, I know, and Baeksang 2024 was even more ridiculous. You know why? Because not only Yoo Jae-suk won the Grand Prize, but the Disney show "Moving" and Kim Dong-shik, Im Wan-ho (cinematography) – "Whales and I" too, so they give 3 different Daesang that year in the same category!
1 0
Replying to Miiiii Sooo May 5, 2025
since best actress in baeksang is kim tae ri. tell me does this drama deserves . is it good . is there any boring…
It's not for the average Kdrama lovers, that I can tell. It's more like a Broadway drama than a Kdrama with masterclass acting by Taeri!
16 0
Replying to Tom May 5, 2025
My understanding is that the rookie award is open to actors who have not had significant roles in more than three…
What? There's literally zero difference between actual Rookie actors and Seniors. You can see 100s of rookies and seniors every year, but you still have to pick 4 or 5. If they did a good job, you can tell, just like you can tell with senior actors. You judge their performance the same way, so it's not more difficult.

That's why they should nominate THE BEST and not the MOST POPULAR ones, btw. Who cares about budget and popularity? If an actor is good, the rest doesn't matter. The fact that Lovely Runner actors were nominated proves my point. The only reason they were nominated because that show was the most mainstream last year.

I can tell by looking at their faces they don't know why are they even nominated. No offense to them, they're not bad actors, it's just their roles were bang average at best.

To be fair, I live in delulu land where these so called prestigious awards only nominate the best, and they don't try to include mainstream in the list for more views. Sadly, that's how this industry work all-around the world.
4 0
Replying to 9999775 May 5, 2025
I was predicting Kim Taeri to win Best Actress and IU to win Daesang, since Daesang is more of a cultural impact…
TV Shows and Variety are not the same thing. TV shows have a strict rule to follow the script etc. Meanwhile, Variety contents are much more free. This is not about where you can watch it. It's like comparing a painting with a sketch.

Variety is more about improv and following a basic plan/script! You have much more freedom.
4 5
Replying to 9999775 May 5, 2025
I was predicting Kim Taeri to win Best Actress and IU to win Daesang, since Daesang is more of a cultural impact…
I get that, I'm not saying it don't deserve the Award, but Variety shows shouldn't be in the same category with actual TV Shows. Like, if they do this, they could just put everything in 1 category, movies, shows and variety.
3 7
Replying to Tom May 5, 2025
My understanding is that the rookie award is open to actors who have not had significant roles in more than three…
It's still nonsense, tho. A Rookie Award should go to actual rookies who debuted that year with an important role. Main or Supporting.
11 2
Dojemi10 May 5, 2025
Overall, I think the winners deserved the Awards. My only complaint is that IU should've won the "Best Actress" and Kin Taeri the "Grand Prize (Daesang)".

I think Variety contents should have their separate category, because it's weird to give the Grand Prize to a culinary show. Even if it's that good.
16 12
Replying to makepetteri32 Apr 25, 2025
TBH first John wick movie was very good, almost realistic to some extent but after that they just became milking…
I think the first 2 was basically 1 story, so it was good, but the rest is what you said. This is what I hate about Hollywood. If they have a good movie, they think they have to milk it till it's became a joke. It's basically like any other Marvel movie.
1 0
Replying to Marwen Ricky Apr 25, 2025
Hollywood’s so creatively bankrupt, they’re rebooting reboots and calling it ‘meta.’ Next up: Fast & Furious…
More like MAINSTREAM Hollywood. There are a LOT of great movies and show in the West and we can say the same about basically every country. Even Kdrama land. The mainstream shows and movies are usually bang average at best.
18 0