She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
At its core, feminism is about dismantling the patriarchy, because only then can there be a world with equal rights, opportunities, and genuine free choice. Otherwise, itâs just âchoice feminism.
Seems like you don't get it eventhough I said it before. My critique is not about her choices but about her being non-existent if not for TLC as a character. She is not his equal as a character and not as a love interest. I really do hope that you understand it now. Her so called choices revolve around the male lead ONLY!
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
Exactly! Finally someone who understands me. It's just such a pity cause Ashui could have had that treatment too especially if she is the love interest of TLC.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
No dear, Feminism doesnât fight for women to simply make free choices, its goal is to dismantle the patriarchy đ€ hope this helps you more to understand đđ»
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
Ok you are 100% deflecting and minimizing my critique. Youâre redirecting the conversation to the identity of critics, past fandom behavior, production constraints, or genre conventions instead of engaging with the actual issue which is weak writing. Youâre framing my critique as "negative" or unfair, subtly tone-policing me and trying to discredit the argument rather than addressing it. I also noticed your repeated attempts to shade and imply things about me, itâs unnecessary and frankly childish. Thatâs exactly how underwritten female characters get dismissed instead of being properly critiqued.
Pointing out weak writing isnât negativity, itâs necessary if we want better representation and more complex female characters in dramas. Thereâs no need to continue this conversation if criticism is going to be constantly redirected or personalized. Seems like someone likes Ashui as a character despite her flawed writing and cannot accept different opinions about her. Hope you have a good day still đ
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
You are missing my point. My critique is about the bad writing itself, specifically how Ashui is written without independence from the male lead. XFT is independent, thinks for herself, and has her own motivations. Why should anyone even compare the two when they are so different from the start? Subtle hints, mysterious powers, or plot-driven abilities arenât the same as real character development, and framing the story as male-centric doesnât change the fact that the writing leaves her underdeveloped.
People are shying away from critiquing these issues, but it is necessary if we want better representation and more complex female characters in dramas. But let's agree to disagree.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
My critique is about her orbiting around TLC and not having real agency outside of him. Itâs already episode 18, halfway through the drama, and thereâs still no meaningful development for her. Personally, I would struggle to trust a story that hasnât introduced a convincing female character by this point, but you do you.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
And I am saying her "choices" and "motivations" revolve around TLC only đ that was what I was criticizing. Anyways I hope I will enjoy it too, thanks!
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
I think you are redirecting the conversation to context instead of addressing the actual issue. Explaining the system doesnât change what it produces and ends up protecting the structure that keeps women underwritten. Criticism isnât negativity; it is about calling out weak writing, which is still present here, not just for Ashui but for nearly every character besides Tang Lici. Letâs just call it by its name, itâs bad writing, no matter the genre đ€
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
My point isnât that she isnât strong or admirable as a person. The issue is how the story writes her. Right now, the narrative frames her almost entirely around Tang Lici, which limits her agency and makes her feel underdeveloped.
You can admire her strength and still expect the writers to give her choices, motivations, and scenes that define her outside of the male lead. Recognizing her personal qualities doesnât mean we shouldnât notice weak writing or missed opportunities for richer character development.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
I appreciate the context, but I want to address whatâs really being implied here. Suggesting that criticism of Ashui mainly comes from BL or danmei fans who donât want a female lead subtly dismisses valid critiques and implies that anyone pointing out weak writing must be biased. That is not true. Critiquing a characterâs lack of agency, motivation, or depth has nothing to do with fandom or genre preference. It is about the quality of the writing.
Even if Ashui is meant to be mysterious or miraculous, the writers could still give her choices, subtle motivations, and foreshadowing to make her feel like a fully realized character. Right now, she mostly exists to orbit Tang Lici, and that is what makes her feel underdeveloped.
Calling out these patterns is not anti-female or a double standard. It is about storytelling and representation. Excusing weak writing by hiding behind genre conventions or assuming critics are biased fans only perpetuates underdeveloped female characters. Discussions like this are important because they help us see how to write women with agency and depth.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
I see what youâre implying, but let me clarify something. My critique has nothing to do with disliking a female character or applying a double standard. Itâs about writing depth and narrative structure. Pointing out that almost every character, male or female, revolves around Tang Lici isnât bias, itâs analysis.
Suggesting that criticism of Ashui must come from discomfort with caring or dependent women is exactly the kind of framing that shuts down meaningful discussion. Iâm not against femininity or nurturing traits, Iâm against flat writing that defines a womanâs entire existence by a manâs storyline.
You can absolutely appreciate all types of women in fiction and still expect them to be written with agency, individuality, and purpose. Thatâs not a contradiction; thatâs a standard for good storytelling.
And honestly, it makes complete sense that women criticize Ashuiâs character more than the male ones. When youâve lived in a world that often limits womenâs voices and agency, you notice immediately when a female character is written as secondary, dependent, or without her own goals.
Real women donât exist to orbit men or to reflect their growth, yet thatâs still how female characters are too often written. Itâs not about "hating" her; itâs about wanting better representation. Women want to see female characters who are as complex, flawed, and self-driven as real women are. Thatâs not bias, thatâs awareness.
And thatâs exactly why conversations like this matter. Talking about how women are written, what patterns we see, and what feels outdated is important for feminism to grow. The more we discuss it openly, the clearer it becomes what real equality and nuanced female representation can look like.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
My point isnât that softness or dependency makes a character "useless".
What I meant is that, from a writing perspective, she hasnât been given much agency or inner motivation beyond her connection to Tang Lici. Itâs not about her being a homemaker-type or lacking ambition; itâs about her not having a personal arc that shows her inner world or her choices shaping the story.
Strength can absolutely be expressed through kindness, but even kind, nurturing characters can be written with depth, conflict, and individuality. Thatâs what I feel is missing right now. Iâd love to see the show explore that side of her more, so her warmth feels like a conscious strength, not just a trait in service of the male lead. BUT yeah that is my perspective, if you have less expectations regarding the quality so be it đ I personally want to see female characters that are equal to their male counterparts... not a side-character that is being used for the arc of the ml.
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good…
Weâre already at episode 18, and she still doesnât have distinct character traits or an agenda outside of TLC. Even if her backstory gets revealed later, itâs still weak writing not to give any clues by now.
I also said she feels useless, not that she is, but as a character, she revolves completely around TLC, and heâs her only focus. Thatâs not limited to her either; itâs the same with Chi Yun, Shen Langhun, and even Liu Yan. Itâs honestly disappointing because the show has potential for deeper, more layered characters but right now it just seems like your typical Liu Yun Xi drama... 90% at the center.
And about the idea that âpeople just donât want the ML to interact closely with women,â thatâs quite a dismissive and frankly misogynistic way to frame valid criticism. Many of us want to see strong, well-written female characters who can stand beside male leads as equals, not just orbit them. Wanting better female representation isnât about jealousy; itâs about wanting quality writing and agency.
The âdamsel in needâ archetype with no inner drive or unique identity feels outdated. Iâd love to see her and the other characters get more independent goals, choices, and internal struggles. Thatâs what gives characters real weight and makes dramas more meaningful too.
The hate on Ashui here is crazy. Well sorry to disappoint you, she is an important character. Her abilities to…
She feels so useless, because she as a character has no goals and needs other than Tang Lici... not a very good written character despite her abilities. It's a shame... without Tang Lici she would have nothing at this point đŹ
100% agree about everything you said and I am still at ep 20 so far... but how could people enjoy this drama so much honestly. It baffles me that this is considered one of the best Cdramas đ
Seems like you don't get it eventhough I said it before. My critique is not about her choices but about her being non-existent if not for TLC as a character. She is not his equal as a character and not as a love interest. I really do hope that you understand it now. Her so called choices revolve around the male lead ONLY!
Pointing out weak writing isnât negativity, itâs necessary if we want better representation and more complex female characters in dramas. Thereâs no need to continue this conversation if criticism is going to be constantly redirected or personalized. Seems like someone likes Ashui as a character despite her flawed writing and cannot accept different opinions about her. Hope you have a good day still đ
People are shying away from critiquing these issues, but it is necessary if we want better representation and more complex female characters in dramas.
But let's agree to disagree.
You can admire her strength and still expect the writers to give her choices, motivations, and scenes that define her outside of the male lead. Recognizing her personal qualities doesnât mean we shouldnât notice weak writing or missed opportunities for richer character development.
Even if Ashui is meant to be mysterious or miraculous, the writers could still give her choices, subtle motivations, and foreshadowing to make her feel like a fully realized character. Right now, she mostly exists to orbit Tang Lici, and that is what makes her feel underdeveloped.
Calling out these patterns is not anti-female or a double standard. It is about storytelling and representation. Excusing weak writing by hiding behind genre conventions or assuming critics are biased fans only perpetuates underdeveloped female characters. Discussions like this are important because they help us see how to write women with agency and depth.
Suggesting that criticism of Ashui must come from discomfort with caring or dependent women is exactly the kind of framing that shuts down meaningful discussion. Iâm not against femininity or nurturing traits, Iâm against flat writing that defines a womanâs entire existence by a manâs storyline.
You can absolutely appreciate all types of women in fiction and still expect them to be written with agency, individuality, and purpose. Thatâs not a contradiction; thatâs a standard for good storytelling.
And honestly, it makes complete sense that women criticize Ashuiâs character more than the male ones. When youâve lived in a world that often limits womenâs voices and agency, you notice immediately when a female character is written as secondary, dependent, or without her own goals.
Real women donât exist to orbit men or to reflect their growth, yet thatâs still how female characters are too often written. Itâs not about "hating" her; itâs about wanting better representation. Women want to see female characters who are as complex, flawed, and self-driven as real women are. Thatâs not bias, thatâs awareness.
And thatâs exactly why conversations like this matter. Talking about how women are written, what patterns we see, and what feels outdated is important for feminism to grow. The more we discuss it openly, the clearer it becomes what real equality and nuanced female representation can look like.
What I meant is that, from a writing perspective, she hasnât been given much agency or inner motivation beyond her connection to Tang Lici. Itâs not about her being a homemaker-type or lacking ambition; itâs about her not having a personal arc that shows her inner world or her choices shaping the story.
Strength can absolutely be expressed through kindness, but even kind, nurturing characters can be written with depth, conflict, and individuality. Thatâs what I feel is missing right now. Iâd love to see the show explore that side of her more, so her warmth feels like a conscious strength, not just a trait in service of the male lead. BUT yeah that is my perspective, if you have less expectations regarding the quality so be it đ I personally want to see female characters that are equal to their male counterparts... not a side-character that is being used for the arc of the ml.
I also said she feels useless, not that she is, but as a character, she revolves completely around TLC, and heâs her only focus. Thatâs not limited to her either; itâs the same with Chi Yun, Shen Langhun, and even Liu Yan. Itâs honestly disappointing because the show has potential for deeper, more layered characters but right now it just seems like your typical Liu Yun Xi drama... 90% at the center.
And about the idea that âpeople just donât want the ML to interact closely with women,â thatâs quite a dismissive and frankly misogynistic way to frame valid criticism. Many of us want to see strong, well-written female characters who can stand beside male leads as equals, not just orbit them. Wanting better female representation isnât about jealousy; itâs about wanting quality writing and agency.
The âdamsel in needâ archetype with no inner drive or unique identity feels outdated. Iâd love to see her and the other characters get more independent goals, choices, and internal struggles. Thatâs what gives characters real weight and makes dramas more meaningful too.