Some people say RanRan has been showing preference to SY and yet the drama has shown so far that that has not…
Agreed! I also think there have been small moments when she rebuffs him. Like, he’ll step closer to her and she’ll step back from him. I don’t see what others are seeing about her behavior.
You skipped episodes that you need to watch so you can go back and fix your review. You wrote, " ....No amount…
There is enough space in the comments section for fans and critics alike. I’ve already laid out what is factually accurate about the reviewer’s language. If you don’t like someone’s interpretation of the violent scene, just ignore it.
You skipped episodes that you need to watch so you can go back and fix your review. You wrote, " ....No amount…
It’s totally fine if you find the language of the review hyperbolic and those words aren’t the ones you’d choose to describe the incident in your own review.
But the terms “wife beater” and “beat until bloody” aren’t factually inaccurate. If a man beats his wife once, he’s a wife beater. He isn’t a serial wife beater but he is a wife beater. Similarly, he used enough force in his violence that it resulted in blood. The drama itself verifies this by including a close up of the wound while her maid attends to it later that same night.
And again, there’s nothing wrong with your feeling for this character or your choice to defend him. But the reviewer doesn’t need to “fix” their review or rewatch the drama because they’re examining a specific incident (when the character whipped his wife with enough force to make her bleed) when you’d prefer to discuss the character’s behavior in totality (he isn’t generally characterized as a violent person). You simply have a different interpretation of his violence than the reviewer did.
i agree completely and i'd go as far as to say the 4th couple is the only one so far that feels like they're having…
Yeah, I second ALL OF THIS. But I also wanted to point out that we’ve finally gotten a ML whose avoidance of women is built into his characterization in a persuasive way. His job is truly dangerous and it makes sense that he wouldn’t want to bring a vulnerable person into that orbit. It’s also been suggested via the cliff side scene that his relationships with his immediate female relatives have resulted in some sort of trauma. Interestingly, he’s the only ML who hasn’t expressed any sexism in the context of his relationship with a female partner. There’s been no sweeping and discriminatory generalizations about gender in his dialogue towards her, that I’ve noticed.
You skipped episodes that you need to watch so you can go back and fix your review. You wrote, " ....No amount…
Yes! Thank you for saying what I’ve been thinking for so long!!
That scene isn’t an accident in the sense that he tripped, the whip skidded across the floor, and somehow gave her a sizable cut on her shoulder. He raised the whip with violent intent and struck his wife, leaving a bloody wound. Those are facts. No one should be excusing his violence by claiming he had another (significantly more disempowered!) victim in mind.
I don’t think anyone is a bad person because they like or want to defend a fictional character. At the same time, I don’t think it’s kosher to label a description of something we’ve all seen happen onscreen as a misrepresentation of facts
I feel similarly! From the beginning, he never bullies her or gives her the cold shoulder or invents traps where…
Totally! I did not trust this drama enough to believe she was going to be honest and then she was…it took me a full minute to understand what had happened! 😂
I’ve written a lot of criticism of this drama and I stand by it. I still don’t think I’d recommend it to others, but MY GOD, this couple is THE CUTEST. Like you, I wish we hadn’t had to trek through the muddle of the previous episodes but I’m certainly content with where we are now and I’m crossing my fingers that it continues with the youngest sister.🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
Let me just preface this by saying that i've been silently lurking because i don't want to rain on anyone's parade.…
I feel similarly! From the beginning, he never bullies her or gives her the cold shoulder or invents traps where she’s meant to prove herself to him. Even when he was cold, he was still generous, well mannered, and honest towards her. His avoidance of women seems based in prior life experience, not just hand-waved away as “those were the times!”
Now, this couple is THE CUTEST. They work together, protect one another, and genuinely seem to enjoy an equitable level of intimacy and caretaking in their marriage. It’s clear he appreciates her and she’s kind and understanding towards him. I’d totally watch a drama all about them!!
You skipped episodes that you need to watch so you can go back and fix your review. You wrote, " ....No amount…
This is the same analysis of the whipping scene that I had.
It is correct to say he whipped her. That is what happened. Was she his intended victim? No. But who he was aiming for and his ultimate reason for the attempted assault on his servant are immaterial to the fact that he struck his wife with a whip and she bled from a gash on her shoulder. T
This is what the charge of manslaughter is for in the United States. If you drive after drinking and accidentally get into a car crash that results in another’s death, you still go to jail. The reason you were drinking and the destination you were intending to reach is immaterial to the crime. Of course, extenuating circumstances are factored into sentencing decisions, but they don’t negate the fact that a crime occurred.
I hate how they try to compare this "historically accurate" drama with Pride and Prejudice. Jane Austin was ahead…
That’s such a good point! I forgot the extent of Wickham’s womanizing and how closely it mirrors Fuhui’s husband. Jane Austen was ahead of her time which is ironic because this drama is so behind its own. It’s great to find another true fan of Pride and Prejudice here.😊
But the terms “wife beater” and “beat until bloody” aren’t factually inaccurate. If a man beats his wife once, he’s a wife beater. He isn’t a serial wife beater but he is a wife beater. Similarly, he used enough force in his violence that it resulted in blood. The drama itself verifies this by including a close up of the wound while her maid attends to it later that same night.
And again, there’s nothing wrong with your feeling for this character or your choice to defend him. But the reviewer doesn’t need to “fix” their review or rewatch the drama because they’re examining a specific incident (when the character whipped his wife with enough force to make her bleed) when you’d prefer to discuss the character’s behavior in totality (he isn’t generally characterized as a violent person). You simply have a different interpretation of his violence than the reviewer did.
That scene isn’t an accident in the sense that he tripped, the whip skidded across the floor, and somehow gave her a sizable cut on her shoulder. He raised the whip with violent intent and struck his wife, leaving a bloody wound. Those are facts. No one should be excusing his violence by claiming he had another (significantly more disempowered!) victim in mind.
I don’t think anyone is a bad person because they like or want to defend a fictional character. At the same time, I don’t think it’s kosher to label a description of something we’ve all seen happen onscreen as a misrepresentation of facts
I’ve written a lot of criticism of this drama and I stand by it. I still don’t think I’d recommend it to others, but MY GOD, this couple is THE CUTEST. Like you, I wish we hadn’t had to trek through the muddle of the previous episodes but I’m certainly content with where we are now and I’m crossing my fingers that it continues with the youngest sister.🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
Now, this couple is THE CUTEST. They work together, protect one another, and genuinely seem to enjoy an equitable level of intimacy and caretaking in their marriage. It’s clear he appreciates her and she’s kind and understanding towards him. I’d totally watch a drama all about them!!
It is correct to say he whipped her. That is what happened. Was she his intended victim? No. But who he was aiming for and his ultimate reason for the attempted assault on his servant are immaterial to the fact that he struck his wife with a whip and she bled from a gash on her shoulder. T
This is what the charge of manslaughter is for in the United States. If you drive after drinking and accidentally get into a car crash that results in another’s death, you still go to jail. The reason you were drinking and the destination you were intending to reach is immaterial to the crime. Of course, extenuating circumstances are factored into sentencing decisions, but they don’t negate the fact that a crime occurred.