Beautiful, sexy, cute FL and a very supportive, kind, caring ML. Very good, simple, no love triangles, no misunderstandings, no angst, and lots of romance. Enjoy.
Very good, i loved it. I have no complaints about the FL. Many are saying she's immature and childish, but i disagree. I think she's smart and cute. Why do we always want masculine, strong, badass, i don't need no man type FL's? The men are portrayed as traditional masculine characters. Therefore, FL's should be traditionally feminine to match the ML. A big win for the ML. He was smart, competent, and dedicated to the FL and always one step ahead of everyone. Reminds me of the ML in Refreshman. My god, episode 17πππ We need more of those scenes in Cdramas.
Depends if you're referring to chronological age or metabolic age. There are many people who are chronologically older than younger people but are fitter, stronger, and more muscular, making them metabolically younger, enabling them to do and achieve more.
Finally finished. Overall, i liked it, but I was too frustrated at times to the point that i had skipped to later episodes to find out how things turned out to reassure myself before going back to the earlier episode before skipping. This happened twice. Around episode 5/6, then again around episode 13/14. If I'm really loving a drama, this wouldn't happen. It's possible i may have dropped this around episode 6 if it wasn't for the actors and the hype. I loved episode 16, so at least it ended well, but i think they overdid the conflict and negativity between the leads, and that annoying SML didn't help either. I think he might be the most annoying SML I've seen in Kdramas. It's hard to say because usually SML's are the opposite. They're usually kind, caring, protective, and helpful towards the FL. The most annoying SFL I've ever seen would have to be Hong Se Na in Rooftop Prince. Does anyone agree? If not, who's yours?
No love triangle. Yes, main lead get divorced.There is 2nd ML that always disturb main couple. No 2nd FL.
Yeah, i understand that part. But in dramaland, it mainly involves 2 male characters and a female character, or 2 female characters and a male character. And in the majority of those, the second leads feelings are unrequited. So we label those situations as love triangles to define it and make it easier to understand. Love triangles can take on different forms. they can be on a spectrum, and it can involve multiple characters. In QoT, we have the typical love triangle between ML, FL, and SML, with the FL having feelings for only the ML. So that would be considered the most basic common love triangle in dramaland. When the question on love triangles is asked on MDL, that's usually what they're referring to. The answer would be yes, BUT you could also add the FL only loves the ML.
No love triangle. Yes, main lead get divorced.There is 2nd ML that always disturb main couple. No 2nd FL.
Then what's your definition of a love triangle? When you say "where i live, it's not a love triangle," that doesn't apply to most people because most people don't live where you are from. Therefore, when responding to people asking about love triangles, we have to use the general definition of love triangles. So, by definition, a love triangle is a situation in which two people both love a third person, regardless of whether that third person has feelings for one or both. That's the most common and widely accepted definition of love triangles.