What r u talking abt???? LMFAO js because some weird k pop fans decide to give hate to idols who announce a relationship…
Waste your time or not, in the future reply intelligently instead of talking nonsense. It's toxic when crazy idol worshipping fans get triggered when they see their celebrities they put on their pedelstals plastered all over the internet. Then they criticise writers on MDL like lo_ve for simply posting the news. Are you one of those toxic fans insulting writers on MDL?
What r u talking abt???? LMFAO js because some weird k pop fans decide to give hate to idols who announce a relationship…
Not good enough. If you don't want lo_ve posting articles about celebrities' lives other than their careers, then even if he made it public, you should be against this post. You can't have it both ways. Stop using journalists and paparazzi for your own benefit.
Bro chill, it's not that deep. It's not like the writer's spreading rumors.
But now you're contradicting yourself. So celebrities can use social media and the press to their own will and benefits, but when they're in public where they have no rights to privacy, they complain about the paparazzi who are legally in their rights. Then, when crazy idol worshipping fans see this in the media, they get triggered by these articles. You can't have it both ways.
This is where you are wrong. You have no rights to privacy in public. Let me explain. "Stalking" means to, on multiple occasions, threaten an individual, damage or unlawfully enter a persons real or personal property, maliciously harassing another person with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking. In order to be guilty of stalking you have to make the person afraid for their safety.
Paparazzi might be annoying but most people aren't worried for their safety around them. Most of them do not actually stalk. They do not follow someone with the intent to cause harm or to threaten them. They also generally take their photos from public property.
You have to remember they are public figures, they choose to put themselves in the publics eye. There are also times that celebrities really want the paparazzi to be filming them. Their careers sometimes thrive on the media attention and it helps their "brand". For some people this is a really big deal, like Paris Hilton who isn't really famous for much other than paparazzi attention. At the same time a celebrity may want to develop the image of being a sort of playboy big shot so being filmed at a club helps that. So they can use the paparazzi for their gain, but complain when the same paparazzi take their pics without their knowledge.
And just like you mentioned previously, "it does matter. You have no right to suppress freedom of speech." Remember that.
What r u talking abt???? LMFAO js because some weird k pop fans decide to give hate to idols who announce a relationship…
Exactly. Finally someone with common sense👏 You've just proven my point and agreed with what I've been saying all along. Do you think i was serious in my original comment?
It doesn't matter. It's adding fuel to the fire. If crazy fans go ape shit over dating rumours, then let's just stop with all news about their privacy.
He wrote that letter for his fans and he posted it on his Instagram, i don't see any problem.
It doesn't matter. It's still their privacy. Y'all go crazy when anything other than their acting career goes public. So why is this ok now? You can't have it both ways. You either accept the news about anything involving these actors, or you oppose any news altogether. All these crazy idol worshipping fans think they can pick and choose what they want to be revealed to the public. Hypocrites.
Please stop posting this nonsense. This is their privacy. You can write a lot on his career, but you insisted on posting this, which is useless. Not cool MDL. You should be ashamed of this post. Oh my god, really, a human being apparently marrying another human being? How dare they, who said celebrities are allowed to have personal lives?😤 Bro, why can't they just leave celebrities alone, like they have their own f*cking life and its none of their buisness to get involved with their private life.
Paparazzi might be annoying but most people aren't worried for their safety around them. Most of them do not actually stalk. They do not follow someone with the intent to cause harm or to threaten them. They also generally take their photos from public property.
You have to remember they are public figures, they choose to put themselves in the publics eye. There are also times that celebrities really want the paparazzi to be filming them. Their careers sometimes thrive on the media attention and it helps their "brand". For some people this is a really big deal, like Paris Hilton who isn't really famous for much other than paparazzi attention. At the same time a celebrity may want to develop the image of being a sort of playboy big shot so being filmed at a club helps that. So they can use the paparazzi for their gain, but complain when the same paparazzi take their pics without their knowledge.
And just like you mentioned previously, "it does matter. You have no right to suppress freedom of speech." Remember that.
Exactly right. This is what I've been explaining all along. But triggered crazy idol worshipping fans think otherwise.