Vincenzo Cassano

You're welcome. Enjoy🤌🇮🇹

Yes, this👏 Finally someone with common sense.

Still naive 🤪

I understand, and i agree that it's absolutely fine. I even agree it's fine to post this news even if he didn't reveal it. But if crazy idol worshipping fans get triggered when any information about their celebrities are posted on MDL, then this post is certainly not ok. You can't have it both ways. You can't pick and choose what journalists can report. It's called freedom of the press. For example, if a celebrity is photographed by paparazzi on a date in public and then posted on MDL, then fans can't be upset about it when the same journalists post an article on MDL of a celebrity confirming his/her marriage. You either accept all news, or only accept news on their careers. This article has nothing to do about his career, it's about his private life even though he made it public. So why criticise one article on a celebrities private life when others are congratulated when it's also about their private lives.

Yeah sure, whatever floats your boat. Remember, think outside the box, and don't be so naive.

So you don't understand. Got it. That's ok, not everyone is smart and quick-witted. Next time, calm down, take a moment to really think about it, and don't be so naive, ignorant, and gullible.

Do you really believe i was serious in my original comment? Have a really good think about it. Read also some of my responses, especially to oppa_. Then you'll realise how sharp you really are. Think outside the box. Don't be so naive.

Waste your time or not, in the future reply intelligently instead of talking nonsense. It's toxic when crazy idol worshipping fans get triggered when they see their celebrities they put on their pedelstals plastered all over the internet. Then they criticise writers on MDL like lo_ve for simply posting the news. Are you one of those toxic fans insulting writers on MDL?

Oh, ok. So when you're defeated, can't respond intelligently, and out of options, you resort to that reply. Got it.

Me too. Lo_ve's articles are informative and perfectly fine.

I'm just over halfway, but is the ML turning into a simp? Is that why she walks all over him?

Is she like this the whole drama?

Then that's not true love. You don't divorce your partner over something like that if you really loved them. You find a way, but you don't end it.

Not good enough. If you don't want lo_ve posting articles about celebrities' lives other than their careers, then even if he made it public, you should be against this post. You can't have it both ways. Stop using journalists and paparazzi for your own benefit.

No, not that either. Read my other comments, and you'll understand.

But now you're contradicting yourself. So celebrities can use social media and the press to their own will and benefits, but when they're in public where they have no rights to privacy, they complain about the paparazzi who are legally in their rights. Then, when crazy idol worshipping fans see this in the media, they get triggered by these articles. You can't have it both ways.

The teacup doesn't know what hit it.

I don't think you get it. Do you think i was serious in my original comment?

This is where you are wrong. You have no rights to privacy in public. Let me explain. "Stalking" means to, on multiple occasions, threaten an individual, damage or unlawfully enter a persons real or personal property, maliciously harassing another person with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking. In order to be guilty of stalking you have to make the person afraid for their safety.

Paparazzi might be annoying but most people aren't worried for their safety around them. Most of them do not actually stalk. They do not follow someone with the intent to cause harm or to threaten them. They also generally take their photos from public property.

You have to remember they are public figures, they choose to put themselves in the publics eye. There are also times that celebrities really want the paparazzi to be filming them. Their careers sometimes thrive on the media attention and it helps their "brand". For some people this is a really big deal, like Paris Hilton who isn't really famous for much other than paparazzi attention. At the same time a celebrity may want to develop the image of being a sort of playboy big shot so being filmed at a club helps that. So they can use the paparazzi for their gain, but complain when the same paparazzi take their pics without their knowledge.

And just like you mentioned previously, "it does matter. You have no right to suppress freedom of speech." Remember that.

"It is dramalist and news(gossiping) site."

Exactly right. This is what I've been explaining all along. But triggered crazy idol worshipping fans think otherwise.