I usually despise the whole 'seductive foxy sexy' act......its usually so cringe to me...but Mu Yumo is actually not annoying when she does it....It actually suits her
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who…
Precisely.
The only thing more pathetic than your critique is your retreat into condescension. You offer "advice on wording" because you cannot engage with the argument.
You dismiss a point as "philosophical" because you lack the depth to comprehend it.😂😂😂(makes sense cause that moronic comment that caused all this was a blaring signal)
You are a small critic with a smaller mind, reducing every challenge to "madness" because you are incapable of a real defense. This was never about the actor. It was about exposing the petty, envious core of your "impartial" judgment.
And you have done that beautifully( for you) . Now, by all means, run along. Your work here is done.
And thanks...my day has BEEN carrying on.....this has just been some minor toilet convo...no biggie.
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who…
The staggering lack of selfawareness it takes to call anyone else "frustrated" while you're the one having a full-blown meltdown because someone had the audacity to dissect your precious "critique." 🤣🤣🤣🤣You're not "clocking" shit.....you're being cornered by logic, and your only escape is to pretend this is about fandom.
You keep bleating "mad fan!" like a broken mantra, because it's the only card you have left. It's a pathetic attempt to dismiss any challenge to your poorly constructed arguments.
Let's be perfectly clear: I'm not mad you criticized him. I am contemptuous of the lazy, moralizing, and intellectually dishonest framework you used to do it. There's a difference, but I wouldn't expect someone of your caliber to grasp it.
You "gave up" because you realized you had no ground to stand on. Your "clarification" was a waste of time because you had nothing of substance to clarify.....you were just trying to backpedal from the nasty implications of your own words.
And the grand, hilarious finale of your little performance is this: "You know it like I know it." 😫😫😫😫😫 No, I don't know that. Because I'm not you, projecting my own bitterness onto a stranger.
I'm not the one seething because an actor I've never met succeeded through a risk I didn't take. This isn't about a "free world" or a "show I like." This is about calling out toxic, envious nonsense when I see it, and you, my dear, are a fountain of it.
But understand that every word just proves you're not a critic......you're just another bitter voice in the chorus, furious that the world doesn't have to perform gratitude for your approval.
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who…
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You've officially run out of argument and have resorted to the last refuge of the intellectually bankrupt: pretending that being called out is a personal emotional crisis for the person calling you out.
"Will you cry?" "Will you not sleep?" What are you, twelve? This isn't the playground. My sleep is perfectly sound, because unlike you, I don't derive my sense of purpose from crafting backhanded, morally-loaded "critiques" of strangers on the internet.
You talk about policing, but the only one desperate for control here is you. You want the power to frame an actor's entire career as a debt he owes to the less fortunate, and you want to be shielded from the consequences of that nasty little narrative. You want to dish out the "self-righteous hate"—and yes, you absolutely chose it—but you can't take it when it's reflected back at you.
You are not a critic. A critic engages with the work. You are a moralizer, using the language of critique to dress up a petty grievance about an artist not living up to your personal charter of gratitude. You're not mad I'm "policing" you. You're mad because I ripped away the flimsy veil of "impartiality" you were hiding behind and exposed your comment for what it is: lame, envious, and utterly devoid of any substantive point.
So by all means, keep writing your "critics." And I'll keep pointing out that they're trash. It's a free internet. But don't for one second think your condescending little jabs about sleep or tears land as anything other than the pathetic flailings of someone who has well and truly lost the plot.
Not only will i sleep...but I'll especially sleep with my ass out so you can come and kiss it😂😂😂
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who…
You're right about one thing....i would survive. Just like I'm surviving watching you try to backpedal from the core implication of your original statement.
Call it "context," call it a "regular critic," but you don't get to use the "tough unfair industry" as a backdrop for your disappointment and then act shocked when someone points out that your "context" is a loaded argument. The entire purpose of bringing up "opportunities that many dream of" is to weight your criticism with a moral charge...the charge of perceived ingratitude or squandered privilege.
You say you "alluded" to the industry. Fine. But you did so specifically to contrast his position with the less fortunate. That is not a neutral observation; it's a framing device designed to make your critique about more than just performance. It makes it about his character and his perceived lack of appreciation for his "luck."
And now you're resorting to "you're mad" and "you'd survive" condescension because your framing has been challenged. You can't defend the substance of the argument, so you're dismissing the reaction to it.
I guess my main mistake was not telling you what I've been trying to explain with so much nuance and semantics....your original comment was an incredibly moronic statement.
I should have just said it...that your entire sentence was stupid.....but i had to bore both of us with explanations....thinking you...the original moronic comment maker....would understand.....but that was on me....i was dreaming too beautifully.
So i guess we'll both be fine when i simply comment that your entire argument is moronic.
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who…
You're still missing the point. Completely.
You call it a "general comment" and "impartial criticism," but the entire foundation of your critique is this assumption of unearned opportunity. You said he "gets opportunities that many in the industry dream of." My whole point is that this framing is fundamentally flawed and dismisses his actual work.
He didn't "get" Word of Honor. He took it. When no one else would. He built that opportunity out of nothing a low-budget, high-risk project with zero guarantees. That's not being handed a dream chance; that's a gamble that paid off because of his work on that specific role. The success that followed was a consequence, not a privilege he was given for which he must now perpetually prove his worth.
Your "disappointment" is rooted in the expectation that because he is now successful, he must now meet a certain standard that you deem worthy of his position. But his position wasn't a gift. It was built. The directors and producers you allude to in the "harsh industry" are the very people who are approving his work now. So who is the real judge? You, or the professionals who continue to hire him?
You can say you're not personally asking for gratitude, but you are invoking the "less fortunate" in the industry to contextualize your disappointment. That is precisely the "he owes the universe" logic. It's not impartial; it's a value judgment loaded with a specific, and frankly unfair, perception of his career trajectory.
So critique the acting. Say you don't like it. But leave the "wasted opportunities" narrative out of it. That narrative is the "extra nonsense," and it's what I'm calling crazy.
And it may seem like I'm frustrated...but this isn't frustration....I'm just baffled by the fact that people can so self righteously hate instead of straight up dissing like everyone else....that's what the paragraph is for....
GJ’s voice acting for SMY is too low for me. I ‘d love him to speak a little bit stronger and enunciate the…
yes...i felt the same first episode too....but it got better. I donno if i just got used to it or it got better as the episodes went along...it sounded less awkward
Love gong jun in reality tv shows which prompted me to try to watch this but his acting hasn’t gotten better…
This is insane. So Gong Jun works hard, gets his spot at the top.. now he has to ensure that all the people who didnt 'get the opportunities' he did feel good?
Mind you 'the opportunities he got' was Word of Honor....the actual lowest budget show ever, no sponsors, no pushes, mediocre management too. He worked on that role, got his hit and achieved A-List status...He wasn't anyone's nepo baby or fave either...he took that role that no one wanted cause there was very little pay and a lot of risk.
Now cause that was a success every bum wants him to be so grateful and kill himself thanking them for the success by molding himself into whatever their standards are. Every time its the same shit 'blabla many others are homeless so he should be grateful and do what i like'....'blablabla'
All this work was approved by the producers, the directors and the investors. They okayed him. They told him how to do it and they passed it. They gave him the script!
Will you all be happy when he contorts himself privately at your homes for your pleasure? I don't know how a well known director can approve something ... as the DIRECTOR.....and you all blame him for it.
Just stop it. If you want to critique fine...say he sucks and you don't wanna see him act...but all this extra nonsense where you all act like he owes the universe for his success and should pay it back is CRAZY!
I'm quote honestly curious...like no shade at all......what exactly do you think he should be like?Like if you…
That's what I'm asking about the specifics of what you're not getting that you want to see since even in the source...his aura is said to be gentle and bland....
And you literally said its not the script....then how is the 'cringe' dialogue written in the script his fault then? Cause dialogue is part of the script....
But since you've clarified that the actor is not for you...that makes sense. Guess see you next time in his next drama then.
And we can only pray and hope you can be in charge of casting next time so those actors which you feel can portray this majestically can be cast....cause unfortunately the writers, the directors and producers decided on him. A shame.
Su Muyu is that one guy in class....who when you all agree to not write the very hard test or study for it....he'll study for it and even remind the teacherðŸ˜
ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜Changhe.....No guillotine could ever take away the head i would give you if could😓😓
The only thing more pathetic than your critique is your retreat into condescension. You offer "advice on wording" because you cannot engage with the argument.
You dismiss a point as "philosophical" because you lack the depth to comprehend it.😂😂😂(makes sense cause that moronic comment that caused all this was a blaring signal)
You are a small critic with a smaller mind, reducing every challenge to "madness" because you are incapable of a real defense. This was never about the actor. It was about exposing the petty, envious core of your "impartial" judgment.
And you have done that beautifully( for you) . Now, by all means, run along. Your work here is done.
And thanks...my day has BEEN carrying on.....this has just been some minor toilet convo...no biggie.
Good night. Don't choke on your saliva or..
anything...please!😘😘😘
You keep bleating "mad fan!" like a broken mantra, because it's the only card you have left. It's a pathetic attempt to dismiss any challenge to your poorly constructed arguments.
Let's be perfectly clear: I'm not mad you criticized him. I am contemptuous of the lazy, moralizing, and intellectually dishonest framework you used to do it. There's a difference, but I wouldn't expect someone of your caliber to grasp it.
You "gave up" because you realized you had no ground to stand on. Your "clarification" was a waste of time because you had nothing of substance to clarify.....you were just trying to backpedal from the nasty implications of your own words.
And the grand, hilarious finale of your little performance is this: "You know it like I know it." 😫😫😫😫😫 No, I don't know that. Because I'm not you, projecting my own bitterness onto a stranger.
I'm not the one seething because an actor I've never met succeeded through a risk I didn't take. This isn't about a "free world" or a "show I like." This is about calling out toxic, envious nonsense when I see it, and you, my dear, are a fountain of it.
But understand that every word just proves you're not a critic......you're just another bitter voice in the chorus, furious that the world doesn't have to perform gratitude for your approval.
You've officially run out of argument and have resorted to the last refuge of the intellectually bankrupt: pretending that being called out is a personal emotional crisis for the person calling you out.
"Will you cry?" "Will you not sleep?" What are you, twelve? This isn't the playground. My sleep is perfectly sound, because unlike you, I don't derive my sense of purpose from crafting backhanded, morally-loaded "critiques" of strangers on the internet.
You talk about policing, but the only one desperate for control here is you. You want the power to frame an actor's entire career as a debt he owes to the less fortunate, and you want to be shielded from the consequences of that nasty little narrative. You want to dish out the "self-righteous hate"—and yes, you absolutely chose it—but you can't take it when it's reflected back at you.
You are not a critic. A critic engages with the work. You are a moralizer, using the language of critique to dress up a petty grievance about an artist not living up to your personal charter of gratitude. You're not mad I'm "policing" you. You're mad because I ripped away the flimsy veil of "impartiality" you were hiding behind and exposed your comment for what it is: lame, envious, and utterly devoid of any substantive point.
So by all means, keep writing your "critics." And I'll keep pointing out that they're trash. It's a free internet. But don't for one second think your condescending little jabs about sleep or tears land as anything other than the pathetic flailings of someone who has well and truly lost the plot.
Not only will i sleep...but I'll especially sleep with my ass out so you can come and kiss it😂😂😂
Call it "context," call it a "regular critic," but you don't get to use the "tough unfair industry" as a backdrop for your disappointment and then act shocked when someone points out that your "context" is a loaded argument. The entire purpose of bringing up "opportunities that many dream of" is to weight your criticism with a moral charge...the charge of perceived ingratitude or squandered privilege.
You say you "alluded" to the industry. Fine. But you did so specifically to contrast his position with the less fortunate. That is not a neutral observation; it's a framing device designed to make your critique about more than just performance. It makes it about his character and his perceived lack of appreciation for his "luck."
And now you're resorting to "you're mad" and "you'd survive" condescension because your framing has been challenged. You can't defend the substance of the argument, so you're dismissing the reaction to it.
I guess my main mistake was not telling you what I've been trying to explain with so much nuance and semantics....your original comment was an incredibly moronic statement.
I should have just said it...that your entire sentence was stupid.....but i had to bore both of us with explanations....thinking you...the original moronic comment maker....would understand.....but that was on me....i was dreaming too beautifully.
So i guess we'll both be fine when i simply comment that your entire argument is moronic.
You call it a "general comment" and "impartial criticism," but the entire foundation of your critique is this assumption of unearned opportunity. You said he "gets opportunities that many in the industry dream of." My whole point is that this framing is fundamentally flawed and dismisses his actual work.
He didn't "get" Word of Honor. He took it. When no one else would. He built that opportunity out of nothing a low-budget, high-risk project with zero guarantees. That's not being handed a dream chance; that's a gamble that paid off because of his work on that specific role. The success that followed was a consequence, not a privilege he was given for which he must now perpetually prove his worth.
Your "disappointment" is rooted in the expectation that because he is now successful, he must now meet a certain standard that you deem worthy of his position. But his position wasn't a gift. It was built. The directors and producers you allude to in the "harsh industry" are the very people who are approving his work now. So who is the real judge? You, or the professionals who continue to hire him?
You can say you're not personally asking for gratitude, but you are invoking the "less fortunate" in the industry to contextualize your disappointment. That is precisely the "he owes the universe" logic. It's not impartial; it's a value judgment loaded with a specific, and frankly unfair, perception of his career trajectory.
So critique the acting. Say you don't like it. But leave the "wasted opportunities" narrative out of it. That narrative is the "extra nonsense," and it's what I'm calling crazy.
And it may seem like I'm frustrated...but this isn't frustration....I'm just baffled by the fact that people can so self righteously hate instead of straight up dissing like everyone else....that's what the paragraph is for....
Mind you 'the opportunities he got' was Word of Honor....the actual lowest budget show ever, no sponsors, no pushes, mediocre management too. He worked on that role, got his hit and achieved A-List status...He wasn't anyone's nepo baby or fave either...he took that role that no one wanted cause there was very little pay and a lot of risk.
Now cause that was a success every bum wants him to be so grateful and kill himself thanking them for the success by molding himself into whatever their standards are. Every time its the same shit 'blabla many others are homeless so he should be grateful and do what i like'....'blablabla'
All this work was approved by the producers, the directors and the investors. They okayed him. They told him how to do it and they passed it. They gave him the script!
Will you all be happy when he contorts himself privately at your homes for your pleasure? I don't know how a well known director can approve something ... as the DIRECTOR.....and you all blame him for it.
Just stop it. If you want to critique fine...say he sucks and you don't wanna see him act...but all this extra nonsense where you all act like he owes the universe for his success and should pay it back is CRAZY!
And you literally said its not the script....then how is the 'cringe' dialogue written in the script his fault then? Cause dialogue is part of the script....
But since you've clarified that the actor is not for you...that makes sense. Guess see you next time in his next drama then.
And we can only pray and hope you can be in charge of casting next time so those actors which you feel can portray this majestically can be cast....cause unfortunately the writers, the directors and producers decided on him. A shame.