Kaptan

You still think that I cannot distinguish between today and yesterday. You prefer not to get to the heart of the matter. I understand that.
Then let me give an example. The eldest female character and two sons of the Shen family. They were not relatives, just grown-up friends. One of the children was engaged. They canceled it. However, the children came and helped even though they were exiles. They didn't see that family as excommunicated people, but their daughter sees this and you call her NORMAL? Everyone was shy, but even the QUEEN MOTHER came to his funeral without hesitation. It is still impossible to understand your insistence on the same thing. We're talking about your daughter. He has an understandable excuse for being in a very bad situation. She wants to be respected and loved. I understand. Well, is this a reason for him to insult his mother, attack her, and play with the chastity of others? Why doesn't he behave more appropriately towards his family? If not, how can his family show him good behavior? Why did they even exhibit such a lame behavior? I don't even understand that.
I am very sorry to say that this is a sign that you do not understand the situation. Your perspective is different. That's why I don't want to extend it. In my opinion it is wrong. For no reason, even if we assume that your reason is normal, the reaction is wrong, and as a result, after the grandmother dies, the eldest daughter of the house kicks this woman out. It's embarrassing. She disowns him. She orders him not to be allowed into their house. So it means it's happening.

If you pay attention. I said that I found the series very excellent and I was also enjoying watching it. However, I did not find his insistence on wanting a maid reasonable. The reason I can't find it is because he has a maid. He takes one of his servants and makes him a concubine. There is no point in asking what will happen to a maid. Let's say he saw the maid. Where did he see it? I don't remember him saying he saw it. I guess they found out she made those cakes. They tried to take that maid as a concubine for money. This must be the reason why you insisted on that maid. However, it was not announced. I do not know.
Latter; If you think this is very logical, the man is spoiled and wants this and that's maid, he has a lot of concubines. If you look at it logically, this guy is like a hungry chicken. He needs a living. So he's a money-grubbing person. He's looking for money. He is not a very rich or well-off person. A servant from a fallen family is left begging. He beats his wife. This includes his wife and her husband. When his family was exiled, he never called his family, did not ask, did not ask if there was anything he needed. He saw that the family bought a house, a shop, they tended to fix themselves, he came home and directly blamed his mother and said, "Give me a maid." Where do you think the logic is in this?
Shouldn't he have asked about his mother's well-being first? Shouldn't he have asked "Do you have any needs?" Wouldn't it be more logical if you first offered support and then made a request?
What should have happened then? So what would logic require? If the person was spoiled, disrespectful to their mother, acted rudely, and never called the family, they should be fired. She should have said, "Go away, I don't have a daughter like you," without being crushed or embarrassed by them.
He cannot resist his daughter, who is on display here. The logic of whatever I do is to please him. However, the other person doesn't even question your illness. Mom doesn't say what's wrong. He attacks directly. Others are watching. Finally came to what I said. Mother died. The man who set up the plot in response to that concubine's unchastity was caught. It turned out that the person who did this was his daughter. After that, our daughter, the head of the house, kicked him out. She disgraced. So now he can be fired. Then why isn't he fired and why is he causing such a problem? If it is given, there should be a logical reason for it, but there is not. Not for me. The justification you give is simple and inconsistent. A reason that does not fit the conclusion.
-I want your maid.
- Hiccup. I can't give it. They are already free. Oh, what can we do?
-Okay, then you are dead, your concubine has lost her chastity. I displayed the underwear of the eldest daughter of the house. She can't find it in her husband anymore. He can't get married either. Finished.
Was it supposed to be like this???
However, I agree that the requirements of that time were complied with. Your explanation was also very good. It was satisfying. My different point of view is, wasn't there any respect for parents at that time? Why didn't he ask for his mother's well-being or call her, but came directly to ask for a maid? That I find this unreasonable. Come on, this was illogical. I do not think it is right for the other party to complain about all these actions, and I think that the reason does not lead to the result. Even at that time, when respect for elders was at the forefront, could the reckless actions of a daughter or groom be approved? That's how that woman was fired after the grandmother died in the 20th episode. The causes were found. So it's happening. It looks like there will be more to come. Enjoy watching.

Thank you very much for your interest.

I understand very well. What I don't understand is how they present this as a reason and go so far as to cause the death of the grandmother, accuse another concubine of unchastity with a conspiracy, and go as far as stealing a woman's underwear. If it was such a simple event, why did it take this long? It was an effect without a reason. That's why I said there was an illogicality.
If it's about a maid, she should take her own maid and make her a concubine. It's very easy for them too. But it seemed a bit inconsistent to me that he was being forced to ask for someone else's maid. It would have made more sense to me if he wanted to marry one of the other women there, not the maid. Because you have it. If you want it from someone else, there is an ulterior motive. Instead of waking up and fainting at the first request, they should be put in their place. They should have been kicked out of that house, slapping their teeth. It's too exaggerated.
Also, this woman is one of your grandmother's daughters. When the family is exiled, she does not call the family and ask if there is anything she needs. Then he sees that they bought a house, a shop, started trading, and they immediately knock on the grandmother's door and demand a maid. No asking how are you mom, are you okay, do you need anything? Give me a maid. I will make a concubine for my husband. Otherwise my husband will beat me. He will look down on it. There is a compulsion here. There is an unreasonable compulsion. There is infinity. If I say this makes sense. Then I would call the reaction irrational.
Why do you listen to these people? Why don't you ask where you have been until now? Hey groom, you want a maid from me, but you never knocked on my door, you didn't help me in my difficult day. You didn't support me. Now why should I give you my maid? I don't. He should have said get out of my house.
However, they were so oppressed and depressed that they acted as if they could find a solution no matter what they did. The grandmother was supposedly thinking of her daughter. But your daughter is screaming at you. It sticks to your collar. Even though you are sick, it makes you worse. What kind of logic does this make, for God's sake? He should have been fired immediately. He should not have been given a face. The male staff at the door should have been told not to bring this inside. Every time they say, "Sir, he crushed me." For some reason, the door staff probably don't stay still either. It didn't work for me.

thanks a lot.

Here's the real answer. Thank you.
Then I think the author of the book simplified the issue. Starting from a very simple reality, I found his reason for wanting a concubine and all the negativity it brought unreasonable. What he wants is a maid. If you want a servant concubine, there is one in your mansion too. It was not appropriate for them to go so far as to cause the grandmother's death and to conspire, to accuse one person of indecency, and to go so far as to steal another person's underwear. In other words, there is no cause-effect relationship. The author's reasoning is simple.

What I want to say is this: They kept the reason low. What is it, sir, the Hua family should give us one of their servants. Let her be my concubine. Reason? There's no reason. My heart wanted it that way. I don't want the woman I took from the Hua family. Let him give me a concubine so that I can ask for her. For God's sake, what kind of reason is this? His mother dies because of him. This cause and effect didn't make any sense to me. Not to mention the events. He accused another woman of unchastity, they attempted to steal the other's underwear, an attempt to commit adultery. Isn't it too much? I think it's a logical error. If he wants a concubine so badly, let him take one from his own servants. I never found any of your statements reasonable, including yours. It is for no reason and brings with it many events. It did not suit the beauty, credibility, emotionality and reality of the series.

While the series was going extremely well, the incident in the 18th and 19th episodes of the series when Hua Jing, the married daughter of the house, asked for a maid from the Hua family as a concubine for her husband, ruined the series. The reason is this: I have a bad relationship with my husband, I want to silence him by taking a concubine. I want him to get over his tension. I want the maid who is the cook of the Hua family. He says give it to me. He buys goods from the market. They already say that servants are free. But he doesn't want to. The man is waiting for a woman to be given to him in the corner of his head. This man already had several concubines. Now with what logic does he want a concubine? No reason. He insists that his family give it to him. If the maid wants a concubine, she has her own maids in her mansions. He can easily make someone his concubine. I wonder if the main thing is to disturb the family. While they were escaping from an excommunicated family. Now, when this family started to recover, did they decide to destroy the family again? I think the reaction in the Hua family is very mild. Even though she does so much, women are given too much tolerance. I couldn't solve this illogicality. This irrationality cast a negative eye on the series. In other words, turning the issue of asking for a maid into such an exaggeration, requesting a maid from someone else as a concubine while they have their own maids, and insisting on even going to a lot of unseemly problems did not suit the series.

Is this a short drama?

I can't wait for the series to air.

Thank you very much

Thank you very much

short series? Or is it a regular 45-minute series? Spoilers please

short series? Or is it a regular 45-minute series? Spoilers please

It's been a long time since I watched it. When I made my comment, I made a general comment immediately after watching it. I didn't make a comment like this happened in this episode. That's why I don't remember. However, in my opinion, there were a lot of faults, but overall it was a very good series. I focused on the whole and evaluated it that way.

He was a good actor, whom I liked very much. I used to call him My Mister. It was also my favorite series. It stuck with me. It's sad that he died at such a young age. I offer my condolences to his loved ones.

I'm not talking about that, I'm not talking about why the King didn't tell the Eunuch that they were looking for the princess because of the accusation that the Prince was rebelling, or why the Eunuch even asked a soldier; what are you looking for? what are you doing? They would say that they were looking for the princess. I don't understand why such an unlikely path was followed. In fact, the scriptwriter wrote and drew many wrong, erroneous and illogical things in this series from the very beginning, and the actors played them. The director also directed. The actors are good, the director is good, otherwise the scriptwriter is very bad. It made me angry.

O.K.

The series is over, but I just watched the 38th episode. Once again, I was left alone with a screenwriter's game. So he didn't show us a proper episode. This time the prince is looking for the kidnapped princess. The king and his followers, including the prime minister, think he is rebelling. Because the prince had all the doors closed. He took the palace soldier with him and went to search. The king calls the prince to find out what happened, but the prince does not go and does not say why. The king is stupid, his eunuch is stupider than him. If a guard there asks the soldier, what are you looking for? what are you doing? They would say, "We are looking for the princess." So we have a screenwriter who treats the audience like idiots. Mashallah, he is starting a rebellion over this incident, but neither the prince nor the eunuch will say what happened. Secret, Secret. Government secret. They wander around with pictures in their hands, but no one knows what they are looking for. My God, you are great. Grant this screenwriter some wisdom. It drove me crazy while watching it again.

In this series, there were many mistakes and mistakes made by the screenwriter, such as illogicality and "I did it". Fortunately, the cast is very good and the director is successful, otherwise the maximum rating would be 5. It was a scenario full of so many mistakes. It was endless. It was the screenwriter's first script anyway. I think it was beyond awful.