Mailyn

Thanks for your reply. I might just look at a couple of episodes just to see how it handles (if it does) the geopolitical reasons for the invasion.

Yes, I get it now. Thank you.

I am not worried - but I must admit that it is a tad unhealthy for young people to be so swayed. I am glad that you aren't. Enjoy!

Oh! I'll kook it up. Thank you.

Yes. he is a good boy, isn't he. We will see, though, if he really is, won't we? Many of the characters in this drama are far too easily manipulated!

Yes. Someone else told me the same thing - saying that the link above is fake. I shall look later.

No. I must have missed something because although the dead husband blackmailed her with it, I don't know what the significance of the bracelet is - even though I have theories.

To be watched alone? Or do you mean solely on account of...? (I don't think that I could watch anything that screams 'misnomer' or 'whitewash' in the title.

Is it very political? Any drama about Tibet which is historically framed as "Tibet’s peaceful liberation" will probably whitewash the invasion and occupation of said country.

I am not even sure that she has a motive as such (that would imply that it was planned) - other than a need to impose her own standards on her offspring. Many patriarchs / matriarchs ruin their families because of their views on filial obedience, etc. Hopefully, she will see the error of her ways. But you could be right. There could be more to it.

Thank you. I will. It is very easy to ignore things in early episodes - which one needs in later ones to figure out what is happening.

I was responding to Starryeyes0803 about her comment. This was not my theory. Sorry. This was just a random guess of hers not based on anything in the drama itself.

Sorry. It was not my theory. Somebody else was just guessing randomly, stating that they would not be surprised if Yan was there to get revenge on the ML. When I replied to you I thought that I was talking to him/her.

Thanks for that. (There are actually comments about the supposed novel but I had not read any of them.)

No, you misunderstand. (There is nothing wrong with the men leaving to pursue their own careers.) I thought that it was odd that she would say it - IF she was the sort of person who chose not to allow her sisters to help with the running of the plantations because of arrogance or a need for dominance, etc. (But she isn't. IMO, her grandmother is to blame for the current state of affairs.)

There is a novel. There is a link to it / discussion about it at the top of the page. Yes. We'll see, won't we. Now I have to find the reply that I made to someone else who thought that I was you - and delete it. Somebody asked me why I thought that Yan wanted revenge.)

Oh thanks. As there is a link at the top for the novel I assumed that there was one. It did not occur to me that that link might be present on all pages whether there is a novel or not.

It never occurred to me as he does not give off villain in disguise vibes. I was just responding to someone else's comment.

Does it matter? or do you use that as a gauge to decide whether to watch a drama or not?

'Kingdom of Women' can just be uneducated rumour-mongering - but what is the connection between the missing Jang wife and the bracelet with the symbol on the bead which the first 'husband' used to blackmail the FL?